Introduce lock guard definition for local_lock_t. There are no users
yet.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <[email protected]>
---
include/linux/local_lock.h | 11 +++++++++++
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/local_lock.h b/include/linux/local_lock.h
index e55010fa73296..706c4b65d9449 100644
--- a/include/linux/local_lock.h
+++ b/include/linux/local_lock.h
@@ -51,4 +51,15 @@
#define local_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags) \
__local_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags)
+DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1(local_lock, local_lock_t,
+ local_lock(_T->lock),
+ local_unlock(_T->lock))
+DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1(local_lock_irq, local_lock_t,
+ local_lock_irq(_T->lock),
+ local_unlock_irq(_T->lock))
+DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1(local_lock_irqsave, local_lock_t,
+ local_lock_irqsave(_T->lock, _T->flags),
+ local_unlock_irqrestore(_T->lock, _T->flags),
+ unsigned long flags)
+
#endif
--
2.43.0
On Fri, 2023-12-15 at 18:07 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> Introduce lock guard definition for local_lock_t. There are no users
> yet.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <[email protected]>
> ---
> include/linux/local_lock.h | 11 +++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/local_lock.h b/include/linux/local_lock.h
> index e55010fa73296..706c4b65d9449 100644
> --- a/include/linux/local_lock.h
> +++ b/include/linux/local_lock.h
> @@ -51,4 +51,15 @@
> #define local_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags) \
> __local_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags)
>
> +DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1(local_lock, local_lock_t,
> + local_lock(_T->lock),
> + local_unlock(_T->lock))
> +DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1(local_lock_irq, local_lock_t,
> + local_lock_irq(_T->lock),
> + local_unlock_irq(_T->lock))
DEFINE_GUARD should fit for the 2 above, right?
Cheers,
Paolo
On 2023-12-18 09:16:49 [+0100], Paolo Abeni wrote:
> > --- a/include/linux/local_lock.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/local_lock.h
> > @@ -51,4 +51,15 @@
> > #define local_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags) \
> > __local_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags)
> >
> > +DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1(local_lock, local_lock_t,
> > + local_lock(_T->lock),
> > + local_unlock(_T->lock))
> > +DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1(local_lock_irq, local_lock_t,
> > + local_lock_irq(_T->lock),
> > + local_unlock_irq(_T->lock))
>
> DEFINE_GUARD should fit for the 2 above, right?
Yes, that will work. Let me update it.
> Cheers,
>
> Paolo
Sebastian