2024-02-13 17:24:04

by Rob Clark

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] drm/msm: Wire up tlb ops

From: Rob Clark <[email protected]>

The brute force iommu_flush_iotlb_all() was good enough for unmap, but
in some cases a map operation could require removing a table pte entry
to replace with a block entry. This also requires tlb invalidation.
Missing this was resulting an obscure iova fault on what should be a
valid buffer address.

Thanks to Robin Murphy for helping me understand the cause of the fault.

Cc: Robin Murphy <[email protected]>
Fixes: b145c6e65eb0 ("drm/msm: Add support to create a local pagetable")
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <[email protected]>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_iommu.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_iommu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_iommu.c
index 5cc8d358cc97..d5512037c38b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_iommu.c
@@ -21,6 +21,8 @@ struct msm_iommu_pagetable {
struct msm_mmu base;
struct msm_mmu *parent;
struct io_pgtable_ops *pgtbl_ops;
+ const struct iommu_flush_ops *tlb;
+ struct device *iommu_dev;
unsigned long pgsize_bitmap; /* Bitmap of page sizes in use */
phys_addr_t ttbr;
u32 asid;
@@ -201,11 +203,33 @@ static const struct msm_mmu_funcs pagetable_funcs = {

static void msm_iommu_tlb_flush_all(void *cookie)
{
+ struct msm_iommu_pagetable *pagetable = cookie;
+ struct adreno_smmu_priv *adreno_smmu;
+
+ if (!pm_runtime_get_if_in_use(pagetable->iommu_dev))
+ return;
+
+ adreno_smmu = dev_get_drvdata(pagetable->parent->dev);
+
+ pagetable->tlb->tlb_flush_all((void *)adreno_smmu->cookie);
+
+ pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(pagetable->iommu_dev);
}

static void msm_iommu_tlb_flush_walk(unsigned long iova, size_t size,
size_t granule, void *cookie)
{
+ struct msm_iommu_pagetable *pagetable = cookie;
+ struct adreno_smmu_priv *adreno_smmu;
+
+ if (!pm_runtime_get_if_in_use(pagetable->iommu_dev))
+ return;
+
+ adreno_smmu = dev_get_drvdata(pagetable->parent->dev);
+
+ pagetable->tlb->tlb_flush_walk(iova, size, granule, (void *)adreno_smmu->cookie);
+
+ pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(pagetable->iommu_dev);
}

static void msm_iommu_tlb_add_page(struct iommu_iotlb_gather *gather,
@@ -213,7 +237,7 @@ static void msm_iommu_tlb_add_page(struct iommu_iotlb_gather *gather,
{
}

-static const struct iommu_flush_ops null_tlb_ops = {
+static const struct iommu_flush_ops tlb_ops = {
.tlb_flush_all = msm_iommu_tlb_flush_all,
.tlb_flush_walk = msm_iommu_tlb_flush_walk,
.tlb_add_page = msm_iommu_tlb_add_page,
@@ -254,10 +278,10 @@ struct msm_mmu *msm_iommu_pagetable_create(struct msm_mmu *parent)

/* The incoming cfg will have the TTBR1 quirk enabled */
ttbr0_cfg.quirks &= ~IO_PGTABLE_QUIRK_ARM_TTBR1;
- ttbr0_cfg.tlb = &null_tlb_ops;
+ ttbr0_cfg.tlb = &tlb_ops;

pagetable->pgtbl_ops = alloc_io_pgtable_ops(ARM_64_LPAE_S1,
- &ttbr0_cfg, iommu->domain);
+ &ttbr0_cfg, pagetable);

if (!pagetable->pgtbl_ops) {
kfree(pagetable);
@@ -279,6 +303,8 @@ struct msm_mmu *msm_iommu_pagetable_create(struct msm_mmu *parent)

/* Needed later for TLB flush */
pagetable->parent = parent;
+ pagetable->tlb = ttbr1_cfg->tlb;
+ pagetable->iommu_dev = ttbr1_cfg->iommu_dev;
pagetable->pgsize_bitmap = ttbr0_cfg.pgsize_bitmap;
pagetable->ttbr = ttbr0_cfg.arm_lpae_s1_cfg.ttbr;

--
2.43.0



2024-02-15 07:34:54

by Johan Hovold

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/msm: Wire up tlb ops

On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 09:23:40AM -0800, Rob Clark wrote:
> From: Rob Clark <[email protected]>
>
> The brute force iommu_flush_iotlb_all() was good enough for unmap, but
> in some cases a map operation could require removing a table pte entry
> to replace with a block entry. This also requires tlb invalidation.
> Missing this was resulting an obscure iova fault on what should be a
> valid buffer address.
>
> Thanks to Robin Murphy for helping me understand the cause of the fault.
>
> Cc: Robin Murphy <[email protected]>
> Fixes: b145c6e65eb0 ("drm/msm: Add support to create a local pagetable")

Sounds like you're missing a

Cc: [email protected]

here? Or is there some reason not to backport this fix (to 5.9 and later
kernels)?

> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <[email protected]>

Johan

2024-02-15 15:56:31

by Rob Clark

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/msm: Wire up tlb ops

On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 11:34 PM Johan Hovold <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 09:23:40AM -0800, Rob Clark wrote:
> > From: Rob Clark <[email protected]>
> >
> > The brute force iommu_flush_iotlb_all() was good enough for unmap, but
> > in some cases a map operation could require removing a table pte entry
> > to replace with a block entry. This also requires tlb invalidation.
> > Missing this was resulting an obscure iova fault on what should be a
> > valid buffer address.
> >
> > Thanks to Robin Murphy for helping me understand the cause of the fault.
> >
> > Cc: Robin Murphy <[email protected]>
> > Fixes: b145c6e65eb0 ("drm/msm: Add support to create a local pagetable")
>
> Sounds like you're missing a
>
> Cc: [email protected]
>
> here? Or is there some reason not to backport this fix (to 5.9 and later
> kernels)?

No reason, I just expected the Fixes tag was sufficient

BR,
-R

> > Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <[email protected]>
>
> Johan

2024-02-20 08:14:14

by Johan Hovold

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/msm: Wire up tlb ops

On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 07:28:53AM -0800, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 11:34 PM Johan Hovold <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 09:23:40AM -0800, Rob Clark wrote:
> > > From: Rob Clark <[email protected]>
> > >
> > > The brute force iommu_flush_iotlb_all() was good enough for unmap, but
> > > in some cases a map operation could require removing a table pte entry
> > > to replace with a block entry. This also requires tlb invalidation.
> > > Missing this was resulting an obscure iova fault on what should be a
> > > valid buffer address.
> > >
> > > Thanks to Robin Murphy for helping me understand the cause of the fault.
> > >
> > > Cc: Robin Murphy <[email protected]>
> > > Fixes: b145c6e65eb0 ("drm/msm: Add support to create a local pagetable")
> >
> > Sounds like you're missing a
> >
> > Cc: [email protected]
> >
> > here? Or is there some reason not to backport this fix (to 5.9 and later
> > kernels)?
>
> No reason, I just expected the Fixes tag was sufficient

No, you should still mark patches intended for stable with an explicit
CC-stable tag (as per the documentation).

The fact that Sasha and his AI tries to catch fixes which the author and
maintainer failed to tag as a fallback should not be relied upon. It
also makes it harder for the stable team and others to determine what
the intention with a fix was.

Johan