2018-05-23 14:54:50

by Ivan Bornyakov

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] nvme: host: core: fix precedence of ternary operator

Ternary operator have lower precedence then bitwise or, so 'cdw10' was
calculated wrong.

Signed-off-by: Ivan Bornyakov <[email protected]>
---
drivers/nvme/host/core.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
index b070c659391f..1eba9b0cb9dc 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
@@ -1577,7 +1577,7 @@ static int nvme_pr_reserve(struct block_device *bdev, u64 key,
static int nvme_pr_preempt(struct block_device *bdev, u64 old, u64 new,
enum pr_type type, bool abort)
{
- u32 cdw10 = nvme_pr_type(type) << 8 | abort ? 2 : 1;
+ u32 cdw10 = nvme_pr_type(type) << 8 | (abort ? 2 : 1);
return nvme_pr_command(bdev, cdw10, old, new, nvme_cmd_resv_acquire);
}

@@ -1589,7 +1589,7 @@ static int nvme_pr_clear(struct block_device *bdev, u64 key)

static int nvme_pr_release(struct block_device *bdev, u64 key, enum pr_type type)
{
- u32 cdw10 = nvme_pr_type(type) << 8 | key ? 1 << 3 : 0;
+ u32 cdw10 = nvme_pr_type(type) << 8 | (key ? 1 << 3 : 0);
return nvme_pr_command(bdev, cdw10, key, 0, nvme_cmd_resv_release);
}

--
2.16.1



2018-05-23 15:08:03

by Max Gurtovoy

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme: host: core: fix precedence of ternary operator



On 5/23/2018 5:56 PM, Ivan Bornyakov wrote:
> Ternary operator have lower precedence then bitwise or, so 'cdw10' was
> calculated wrong.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ivan Bornyakov <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/nvme/host/core.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> index b070c659391f..1eba9b0cb9dc 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> @@ -1577,7 +1577,7 @@ static int nvme_pr_reserve(struct block_device *bdev, u64 key,
> static int nvme_pr_preempt(struct block_device *bdev, u64 old, u64 new,
> enum pr_type type, bool abort)
> {
> - u32 cdw10 = nvme_pr_type(type) << 8 | abort ? 2 : 1;
> + u32 cdw10 = nvme_pr_type(type) << 8 | (abort ? 2 : 1);
> return nvme_pr_command(bdev, cdw10, old, new, nvme_cmd_resv_acquire);
> }
>
> @@ -1589,7 +1589,7 @@ static int nvme_pr_clear(struct block_device *bdev, u64 key)
>
> static int nvme_pr_release(struct block_device *bdev, u64 key, enum pr_type type)
> {
> - u32 cdw10 = nvme_pr_type(type) << 8 | key ? 1 << 3 : 0;
> + u32 cdw10 = nvme_pr_type(type) << 8 | (key ? 1 << 3 : 0);
> return nvme_pr_command(bdev, cdw10, key, 0, nvme_cmd_resv_release);
> }
>
>

Looks good,

Reviewed-by: Max Gurtovoy <[email protected]>