On 14/04/2022 23:00, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
> Hi Dmitry
>
> On 4/14/2022 12:43 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> Quoting Dmitry Baryshkov (2022-04-14 12:20:31)
>>> On 14/04/2022 19:40, Doug Anderson wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 5:19 AM Sankeerth Billakanti
>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> This series adds support for generic eDP panel over aux_bus.
>>>>>
>>>>> These changes are dependent on the following series:
>>>>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-msm/list/?series=613654&state=*
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You're basically depending on the last two patches of that series.
>>>> What's the plan there? In patchwork they're marked as "Not
>>>> Applicable". If they're good to go, maybe we should land them? If not,
>>>> maybe you should include them (with Dmitry as the author, of course)
>>>> at the beginning of your series?
>>>
>>> No, please do not resend patches. The patches in question are marked as
>>> 'Not applicable' as they are really not applicable to Bjorn's tree.
>>> It would be better to point to the correct patchwork:
>>>
>>> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/98585/
>>>
>>> Note those patches still lack the R-B tag. I can include them anyway,
>>> basing on Sankeerth's Tested-by tag, but the formal R-B would also be
>>> good.
>>>
>>
>> Can you resend those as not RFC?
>
> Yes, please resend these, I can ack them.
>
> Previously I held off my ack, as kuogee ran into some issues testing
> them which was later concluded to be a mismatch in QC internal trees due
> to different versions of the changes.( another reason why we should get
> these landed ).
>
> Now, that Sankeerth has tested these, if you can remove RFC and post
> them, I can ack the.
Well, you can ack those patches without them being resent. You have
already added your Reviewed-by to first three patches (which were merged
during last window).
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
On 4/14/2022 1:03 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On 14/04/2022 23:00, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
>> Hi Dmitry
>>
>> On 4/14/2022 12:43 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>> Quoting Dmitry Baryshkov (2022-04-14 12:20:31)
>>>> On 14/04/2022 19:40, Doug Anderson wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 5:19 AM Sankeerth Billakanti
>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This series adds support for generic eDP panel over aux_bus.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> These changes are dependent on the following series:
>>>>>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-msm/list/?series=613654&state=*
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> You're basically depending on the last two patches of that series.
>>>>> What's the plan there? In patchwork they're marked as "Not
>>>>> Applicable". If they're good to go, maybe we should land them? If not,
>>>>> maybe you should include them (with Dmitry as the author, of course)
>>>>> at the beginning of your series?
>>>>
>>>> No, please do not resend patches. The patches in question are marked as
>>>> 'Not applicable' as they are really not applicable to Bjorn's tree.
>>>> It would be better to point to the correct patchwork:
>>>>
>>>> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/98585/
>>>>
>>>> Note those patches still lack the R-B tag. I can include them anyway,
>>>> basing on Sankeerth's Tested-by tag, but the formal R-B would also
>>>> be good.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Can you resend those as not RFC?
>>
>> Yes, please resend these, I can ack them.
>>
>> Previously I held off my ack, as kuogee ran into some issues testing
>> them which was later concluded to be a mismatch in QC internal trees
>> due to different versions of the changes.( another reason why we
>> should get these landed ).
>>
>> Now, that Sankeerth has tested these, if you can remove RFC and post
>> them, I can ack the.
>
> Well, you can ack those patches without them being resent. You have
> already added your Reviewed-by to first three patches (which were merged
> during last window).
>
I thought you might have to rebase them :) that way you could have
resent the rebased patch with the RFC tag removed.
If you dont, you now have my R-b.
Thanks
Abhinav
>