Hi,
static analysis with cppcheck detected a potential null pointer
deference with the following commit:
commit 3c09e2647b5e1f1f9fd383971468823c2505e1b0
Author: Ursula Braun <[email protected]>
Date: Thu Aug 12 01:58:28 2010 +0000
ctcm: rename READ/WRITE defines to avoid redefinitions
The analysis is as follows:
drivers/s390/net/ctcm_sysfs.c:43:8: note: Assuming that condition 'priv'
is not redundant
if (!(priv && priv->channel[CTCM_READ] && ndev)) {
^
drivers/s390/net/ctcm_sysfs.c:42:9: note: Null pointer dereference
ndev = priv->channel[CTCM_READ]->netdev;
The code in question is as follows:
ndev = priv->channel[CTCM_READ]->netdev;
^^ priv may be null, as per check below but it is being
dereferenced when assigning ndev
if (!(priv && priv->channel[CTCM_READ] && ndev)) {
CTCM_DBF_TEXT(SETUP, CTC_DBF_ERROR, "bfnondev");
return -ENODEV;
}
Colin
On 24.04.22 20:58, Colin King (gmail) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> static analysis with cppcheck detected a potential null pointer deference with the following commit:
>
> commit 3c09e2647b5e1f1f9fd383971468823c2505e1b0
> Author: Ursula Braun <[email protected]>
> Date: Thu Aug 12 01:58:28 2010 +0000
>
> ctcm: rename READ/WRITE defines to avoid redefinitions
>
>
> The analysis is as follows:
>
> drivers/s390/net/ctcm_sysfs.c:43:8: note: Assuming that condition 'priv' is not redundant
> if (!(priv && priv->channel[CTCM_READ] && ndev)) {
> ^
> drivers/s390/net/ctcm_sysfs.c:42:9: note: Null pointer dereference
> ndev = priv->channel[CTCM_READ]->netdev;
>
> The code in question is as follows:
>
> ndev = priv->channel[CTCM_READ]->netdev;
>
> ^^ priv may be null, as per check below but it is being dereferenced when assigning ndev
>
> if (!(priv && priv->channel[CTCM_READ] && ndev)) {
> CTCM_DBF_TEXT(SETUP, CTC_DBF_ERROR, "bfnondev");
> return -ENODEV;
> }
>
> Colin
Thank you very much for reporting this, we will provide a patch.
Do you have any special requests for the Reported-by flag? Or is
Reported-by: Colin King (gmail) <[email protected]>
fine with you?
Kind regards
Alexandra
On 25/04/2022 09:38, Alexandra Winter wrote:
>
>
> On 24.04.22 20:58, Colin King (gmail) wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> static analysis with cppcheck detected a potential null pointer deference with the following commit:
>>
>> commit 3c09e2647b5e1f1f9fd383971468823c2505e1b0
>> Author: Ursula Braun <[email protected]>
>> Date: Thu Aug 12 01:58:28 2010 +0000
>>
>> ctcm: rename READ/WRITE defines to avoid redefinitions
>>
>>
>> The analysis is as follows:
>>
>> drivers/s390/net/ctcm_sysfs.c:43:8: note: Assuming that condition 'priv' is not redundant
>> if (!(priv && priv->channel[CTCM_READ] && ndev)) {
>> ^
>> drivers/s390/net/ctcm_sysfs.c:42:9: note: Null pointer dereference
>> ndev = priv->channel[CTCM_READ]->netdev;
>>
>> The code in question is as follows:
>>
>> ndev = priv->channel[CTCM_READ]->netdev;
>>
>> ^^ priv may be null, as per check below but it is being dereferenced when assigning ndev
>>
>> if (!(priv && priv->channel[CTCM_READ] && ndev)) {
>> CTCM_DBF_TEXT(SETUP, CTC_DBF_ERROR, "bfnondev");
>> return -ENODEV;
>> }
>>
>> Colin
>
> Thank you very much for reporting this, we will provide a patch.
Thanks for working on a fix. Much appreciated.
>
> Do you have any special requests for the Reported-by flag? Or is
> Reported-by: Colin King (gmail) <[email protected]>
> fine with you?
>
Can I have:
Reported by: Colin Ian King <[email protected]>
Thank you!
Colin
> Kind regards
> Alexandra