2019-12-27 19:56:56

by Stephen Rothwell

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: linux-next: Fixes tags need some work in the block tree

Hi all,

In commit

1a3d78cb6e20 ("ata: ahci_brcm: BCM7425 AHCI requires AHCI_HFLAG_DELAY_ENGINE")

Fixes tags

Fixes: 9586114cf1e9 ("ata: ahci_brcmstb: add support MIPS-based platforms")
Fixes: 423be77daabe ("ata: ahci_brcmstb: add quirk for broken ncq")

have this problem:

- Target SHA1s do not exist

Perhaps you meant

Fixes: 1980eb9bd7d7 ("ata: ahci_brcmstb: add support for MIPS-based platforms")
Fixes: 7de3244530bf ("ata: ahci_brcmstb: disable NCQ for MIPS-based platforms")

or

Fixes: b46f79bc78e0 ("ata: ahci_brcmstb: add a quirk for MIPS-based platforms")

--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell


Attachments:
(No filename) (499.00 B)
OpenPGP digital signature

2019-12-27 20:28:39

by Florian Fainelli

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: linux-next: Fixes tags need some work in the block tree



On 12/27/2019 11:55 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> In commit
>
> 1a3d78cb6e20 ("ata: ahci_brcm: BCM7425 AHCI requires AHCI_HFLAG_DELAY_ENGINE")
>
> Fixes tags
>
> Fixes: 9586114cf1e9 ("ata: ahci_brcmstb: add support MIPS-based platforms")
> Fixes: 423be77daabe ("ata: ahci_brcmstb: add quirk for broken ncq")
>
> have this problem:
>
> - Target SHA1s do not exist
>
> Perhaps you meant
>
> Fixes: 1980eb9bd7d7 ("ata: ahci_brcmstb: add support for MIPS-based platforms")
> Fixes: 7de3244530bf ("ata: ahci_brcmstb: disable NCQ for MIPS-based platforms")

Yes, those are the two that should have been used, the two commits were
extracted from a downstream tree where the upstream commits ended up
looking slightly different, my script does not (yet) rewrite those, Jens
would you want me to resubmit or can you rewrite the commit message in
place?

>
> or
>
> Fixes: b46f79bc78e0 ("ata: ahci_brcmstb: add a quirk for MIPS-based platforms")
>

--
Florian

2019-12-27 20:30:40

by Jens Axboe

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: linux-next: Fixes tags need some work in the block tree

On 12/27/19 1:27 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>
>
> On 12/27/2019 11:55 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> In commit
>>
>> 1a3d78cb6e20 ("ata: ahci_brcm: BCM7425 AHCI requires AHCI_HFLAG_DELAY_ENGINE")
>>
>> Fixes tags
>>
>> Fixes: 9586114cf1e9 ("ata: ahci_brcmstb: add support MIPS-based platforms")
>> Fixes: 423be77daabe ("ata: ahci_brcmstb: add quirk for broken ncq")
>>
>> have this problem:
>>
>> - Target SHA1s do not exist
>>
>> Perhaps you meant
>>
>> Fixes: 1980eb9bd7d7 ("ata: ahci_brcmstb: add support for MIPS-based platforms")
>> Fixes: 7de3244530bf ("ata: ahci_brcmstb: disable NCQ for MIPS-based platforms")
>
> Yes, those are the two that should have been used, the two commits were
> extracted from a downstream tree where the upstream commits ended up
> looking slightly different, my script does not (yet) rewrite those, Jens
> would you want me to resubmit or can you rewrite the commit message in
> place?

It's too late unfortunately, Linus already pulled it. So we'll have to
live with it, at least the commit titles are correct so it should be
manageable.

--
Jens Axboe

2019-12-27 20:43:24

by Stephen Rothwell

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: linux-next: Fixes tags need some work in the block tree

Hi Jens,

On Fri, 27 Dec 2019 13:29:40 -0700 Jens Axboe <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 12/27/19 1:27 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> > On 12/27/2019 11:55 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >>
> >> In commit
> >>
> >> 1a3d78cb6e20 ("ata: ahci_brcm: BCM7425 AHCI requires AHCI_HFLAG_DELAY_ENGINE")
> >>
> >> Fixes tags
> >>
> >> Fixes: 9586114cf1e9 ("ata: ahci_brcmstb: add support MIPS-based platforms")
> >> Fixes: 423be77daabe ("ata: ahci_brcmstb: add quirk for broken ncq")
> >>
> >> have this problem:
> >>
> >> - Target SHA1s do not exist
> >>
> >> Perhaps you meant
> >>
> >> Fixes: 1980eb9bd7d7 ("ata: ahci_brcmstb: add support for MIPS-based platforms")
> >> Fixes: 7de3244530bf ("ata: ahci_brcmstb: disable NCQ for MIPS-based platforms")
> >
> > Yes, those are the two that should have been used, the two commits were
> > extracted from a downstream tree where the upstream commits ended up
> > looking slightly different, my script does not (yet) rewrite those, Jens
> > would you want me to resubmit or can you rewrite the commit message in
> > place?
>
> It's too late unfortunately, Linus already pulled it. So we'll have to
> live with it, at least the commit titles are correct so it should be
> manageable.

Unfortunately, even the titles are not correct, so they took me a
little time to find the correct commits :-( This means it will also
take the stable maintainers a bit of time.

--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell


Attachments:
(No filename) (499.00 B)
OpenPGP digital signature

2019-12-27 20:45:53

by Jens Axboe

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: linux-next: Fixes tags need some work in the block tree

On 12/27/19 1:39 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Jens,
>
> On Fri, 27 Dec 2019 13:29:40 -0700 Jens Axboe <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On 12/27/19 1:27 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>> On 12/27/2019 11:55 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>>>
>>>> In commit
>>>>
>>>> 1a3d78cb6e20 ("ata: ahci_brcm: BCM7425 AHCI requires AHCI_HFLAG_DELAY_ENGINE")
>>>>
>>>> Fixes tags
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: 9586114cf1e9 ("ata: ahci_brcmstb: add support MIPS-based platforms")
>>>> Fixes: 423be77daabe ("ata: ahci_brcmstb: add quirk for broken ncq")
>>>>
>>>> have this problem:
>>>>
>>>> - Target SHA1s do not exist
>>>>
>>>> Perhaps you meant
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: 1980eb9bd7d7 ("ata: ahci_brcmstb: add support for MIPS-based platforms")
>>>> Fixes: 7de3244530bf ("ata: ahci_brcmstb: disable NCQ for MIPS-based platforms")
>>>
>>> Yes, those are the two that should have been used, the two commits were
>>> extracted from a downstream tree where the upstream commits ended up
>>> looking slightly different, my script does not (yet) rewrite those, Jens
>>> would you want me to resubmit or can you rewrite the commit message in
>>> place?
>>
>> It's too late unfortunately, Linus already pulled it. So we'll have to
>> live with it, at least the commit titles are correct so it should be
>> manageable.
>
> Unfortunately, even the titles are not correct, so they took me a
> little time to find the correct commits :-( This means it will also
> take the stable maintainers a bit of time.

Yeah I see, the 2nd one is not. Gah, that really sucks. I'll let stable
know.

Florian, please ensure that future submissions have both the right titles
and shas.

--
Jens Axboe

2019-12-27 21:53:30

by Florian Fainelli

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: linux-next: Fixes tags need some work in the block tree



On 12/27/2019 12:44 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 12/27/19 1:39 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi Jens,
>>
>> On Fri, 27 Dec 2019 13:29:40 -0700 Jens Axboe <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> On 12/27/19 1:27 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>>> On 12/27/2019 11:55 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> In commit
>>>>>
>>>>> 1a3d78cb6e20 ("ata: ahci_brcm: BCM7425 AHCI requires AHCI_HFLAG_DELAY_ENGINE")
>>>>>
>>>>> Fixes tags
>>>>>
>>>>> Fixes: 9586114cf1e9 ("ata: ahci_brcmstb: add support MIPS-based platforms")
>>>>> Fixes: 423be77daabe ("ata: ahci_brcmstb: add quirk for broken ncq")
>>>>>
>>>>> have this problem:
>>>>>
>>>>> - Target SHA1s do not exist
>>>>>
>>>>> Perhaps you meant
>>>>>
>>>>> Fixes: 1980eb9bd7d7 ("ata: ahci_brcmstb: add support for MIPS-based platforms")
>>>>> Fixes: 7de3244530bf ("ata: ahci_brcmstb: disable NCQ for MIPS-based platforms")
>>>>
>>>> Yes, those are the two that should have been used, the two commits were
>>>> extracted from a downstream tree where the upstream commits ended up
>>>> looking slightly different, my script does not (yet) rewrite those, Jens
>>>> would you want me to resubmit or can you rewrite the commit message in
>>>> place?
>>>
>>> It's too late unfortunately, Linus already pulled it. So we'll have to
>>> live with it, at least the commit titles are correct so it should be
>>> manageable.
>>
>> Unfortunately, even the titles are not correct, so they took me a
>> little time to find the correct commits :-( This means it will also
>> take the stable maintainers a bit of time.
>
> Yeah I see, the 2nd one is not. Gah, that really sucks. I'll let stable
> know.
>
> Florian, please ensure that future submissions have both the right titles
> and shas.

Definitively, very sorry about that and thank you both.
--
Florian