2007-05-02 12:35:13

by Cornelia Huck

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET] sysfs: sysfs rework, take #2

On Sat, 28 Apr 2007 22:39:35 +0900,
Tejun Heo <[email protected]> wrote:

> All the known regrssions are fixed. I think I've got all the
> attr->owner but haven't verified with cross compiling yet, just
> allyesconfig on x86-64 and i386. I'll try to setup some cross compile
> environments tomorrow and follow up if I can find more fallouts.

s390 attr->owner seems to be fine afaics.

I've run some stress tests (attach/detach) on s390 and haven't run into
any problems yet.


2007-05-02 13:05:19

by Tejun Heo

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET] sysfs: sysfs rework, take #2

Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Apr 2007 22:39:35 +0900,
> Tejun Heo <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> All the known regrssions are fixed. I think I've got all the
>> attr->owner but haven't verified with cross compiling yet, just
>> allyesconfig on x86-64 and i386. I'll try to setup some cross compile
>> environments tomorrow and follow up if I can find more fallouts.
>
> s390 attr->owner seems to be fine afaics.
>
> I've run some stress tests (attach/detach) on s390 and haven't run into
> any problems yet.

Great, thanks a lot for testing. I've long stress tests but the only
oops I've seen (which I'm trying to reproduce without success) is caused
by deallocated platform device when udev for it is generated. So, I
think the sysfs changes are pretty stable.

--
tejun