Mind that the patch below was not yet tested
---
! has a higher priority than &
Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <[email protected]>
---
diff --git a/drivers/media/video/em28xx/em28xx-core.c b/drivers/media/video/em28xx/em28xx-core.c
index 7d1537c..da8189a 100644
--- a/drivers/media/video/em28xx/em28xx-core.c
+++ b/drivers/media/video/em28xx/em28xx-core.c
@@ -267,7 +267,7 @@ static int em28xx_write_ac97(struct em28xx *dev, u8 reg, u8 *val)
for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
if ((ret = em28xx_read_reg(dev, AC97BUSY_REG)) < 0)
return ret;
- if (!((u8) ret) & 0x01)
+ if (!(((u8) ret) & 0x01))
return 0;
msleep(5);
}
On Wed, 2008-03-05 at 18:55 +0100, Roel Kluin wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/media/video/em28xx/em28xx-core.c b/drivers/media/video/em28xx/em28xx-core.c
> index 7d1537c..da8189a 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/video/em28xx/em28xx-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/video/em28xx/em28xx-core.c
> @@ -267,7 +267,7 @@ static int em28xx_write_ac97(struct em28xx *dev, u8 reg, u8 *val)
> for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
> if ((ret = em28xx_read_reg(dev, AC97BUSY_REG)) < 0)
> return ret;
> - if (!((u8) ret) & 0x01)
> + if (!(((u8) ret) & 0x01))
I think it'd be clearer without the cast to (u8)
which is then implicit cast back to int anyway
if (!(ret & 1))
Joe Perches wrote:
>> - if (!((u8) ret) & 0x01)
>> + if (!(((u8) ret) & 0x01))
>
> I think it'd be clearer without the cast to (u8)
> which is then implicit cast back to int anyway
>
> if (!(ret & 1))
ok.
---
Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <[email protected]>
---
diff --git a/drivers/media/video/em28xx/em28xx-core.c b/drivers/media/video/em28xx/em28xx-core.c
index 7d1537c..c797472 100644
--- a/drivers/media/video/em28xx/em28xx-core.c
+++ b/drivers/media/video/em28xx/em28xx-core.c
@@ -267,7 +267,7 @@ static int em28xx_write_ac97(struct em28xx *dev, u8 reg, u8 *val)
for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
if ((ret = em28xx_read_reg(dev, AC97BUSY_REG)) < 0)
return ret;
- if (!((u8) ret) & 0x01)
+ if (!(ret & 1))
return 0;
msleep(5);
}
Roel and Joe,
Thanks for your patches.
I've already received and committed two patches with your proposed changes:
http://linuxtv.org/hg/v4l-dvb/rev/127f67dea087
http://linuxtv.org/hg/v4l-dvb/rev/f83ed13f5bf5
Cheers,
Mauro
On Wed, 05 Mar 2008 19:43:46 +0100
Roel Kluin <[email protected]> wrote:
> Joe Perches wrote:
>
> >> - if (!((u8) ret) & 0x01)
> >> + if (!(((u8) ret) & 0x01))
> >
> > I think it'd be clearer without the cast to (u8)
> > which is then implicit cast back to int anyway
> >
> > if (!(ret & 1))
>
> ok.
> ---
>
> Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <[email protected]>
> ---
> diff --git a/drivers/media/video/em28xx/em28xx-core.c b/drivers/media/video/em28xx/em28xx-core.c
> index 7d1537c..c797472 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/video/em28xx/em28xx-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/video/em28xx/em28xx-core.c
> @@ -267,7 +267,7 @@ static int em28xx_write_ac97(struct em28xx *dev, u8 reg, u8 *val)
> for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
> if ((ret = em28xx_read_reg(dev, AC97BUSY_REG)) < 0)
> return ret;
> - if (!((u8) ret) & 0x01)
> + if (!(ret & 1))
> return 0;
> msleep(5);
> }
Cheers,
Mauro