2023-12-12 11:12:07

by Siddharth Vadapalli

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/4] dmaengine: ti: k3-udma-glue: Add function to request TX channel by ID

The existing function k3_udma_glue_request_tx_chn() supports requesting
a TX DMA channel by its name. Add support to request TX channel by ID in
the form of a new function k3_udma_glue_request_tx_chn_by_id() and export
it for use by drivers which are probed by alternate methods (non
device-tree) but still wish to make use of the existing DMA APIs. Such
drivers could be informed about the TX channel to use by RPMsg for example.

Since the implementation of k3_udma_glue_request_tx_chn_by_id() reuses
most of the code in k3_udma_glue_request_tx_chn(), create a new function
for the common code named as k3_udma_glue_request_tx_chn_common().

Signed-off-by: Siddharth Vadapalli <[email protected]>
---
Changes since v1:
- Updated commit message indicating the use-case for which the patch is
being added.

drivers/dma/ti/k3-udma-glue.c | 101 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------
include/linux/dma/k3-udma-glue.h | 4 ++
2 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/dma/ti/k3-udma-glue.c b/drivers/dma/ti/k3-udma-glue.c
index eff1ae3d3efe..ea5119a5e8eb 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/ti/k3-udma-glue.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/ti/k3-udma-glue.c
@@ -274,29 +274,13 @@ static int k3_udma_glue_cfg_tx_chn(struct k3_udma_glue_tx_channel *tx_chn)
return tisci_rm->tisci_udmap_ops->tx_ch_cfg(tisci_rm->tisci, &req);
}

-struct k3_udma_glue_tx_channel *k3_udma_glue_request_tx_chn(struct device *dev,
- const char *name, struct k3_udma_glue_tx_channel_cfg *cfg)
+static int
+k3_udma_glue_request_tx_chn_common(struct device *dev,
+ struct k3_udma_glue_tx_channel *tx_chn,
+ struct k3_udma_glue_tx_channel_cfg *cfg)
{
- struct k3_udma_glue_tx_channel *tx_chn;
int ret;

- tx_chn = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*tx_chn), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!tx_chn)
- return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
-
- tx_chn->common.dev = dev;
- tx_chn->common.swdata_size = cfg->swdata_size;
- tx_chn->tx_pause_on_err = cfg->tx_pause_on_err;
- tx_chn->tx_filt_einfo = cfg->tx_filt_einfo;
- tx_chn->tx_filt_pswords = cfg->tx_filt_pswords;
- tx_chn->tx_supr_tdpkt = cfg->tx_supr_tdpkt;
-
- /* parse of udmap channel */
- ret = of_k3_udma_glue_parse_chn(dev->of_node, name,
- &tx_chn->common, true);
- if (ret)
- goto err;
-
tx_chn->common.hdesc_size = cppi5_hdesc_calc_size(tx_chn->common.epib,
tx_chn->common.psdata_size,
tx_chn->common.swdata_size);
@@ -312,7 +296,7 @@ struct k3_udma_glue_tx_channel *k3_udma_glue_request_tx_chn(struct device *dev,
if (IS_ERR(tx_chn->udma_tchanx)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(tx_chn->udma_tchanx);
dev_err(dev, "UDMAX tchanx get err %d\n", ret);
- goto err;
+ return ret;
}
tx_chn->udma_tchan_id = xudma_tchan_get_id(tx_chn->udma_tchanx);

@@ -325,7 +309,7 @@ struct k3_udma_glue_tx_channel *k3_udma_glue_request_tx_chn(struct device *dev,
dev_err(dev, "Channel Device registration failed %d\n", ret);
put_device(&tx_chn->common.chan_dev);
tx_chn->common.chan_dev.parent = NULL;
- goto err;
+ return ret;
}

if (xudma_is_pktdma(tx_chn->common.udmax)) {
@@ -349,7 +333,7 @@ struct k3_udma_glue_tx_channel *k3_udma_glue_request_tx_chn(struct device *dev,
&tx_chn->ringtxcq);
if (ret) {
dev_err(dev, "Failed to get TX/TXCQ rings %d\n", ret);
- goto err;
+ return ret;
}

/* Set the dma_dev for the rings to be configured */
@@ -365,13 +349,13 @@ struct k3_udma_glue_tx_channel *k3_udma_glue_request_tx_chn(struct device *dev,
ret = k3_ringacc_ring_cfg(tx_chn->ringtx, &cfg->tx_cfg);
if (ret) {
dev_err(dev, "Failed to cfg ringtx %d\n", ret);
- goto err;
+ return ret;
}

ret = k3_ringacc_ring_cfg(tx_chn->ringtxcq, &cfg->txcq_cfg);
if (ret) {
dev_err(dev, "Failed to cfg ringtx %d\n", ret);
- goto err;
+ return ret;
}

/* request and cfg psi-l */
@@ -382,11 +366,42 @@ struct k3_udma_glue_tx_channel *k3_udma_glue_request_tx_chn(struct device *dev,
ret = k3_udma_glue_cfg_tx_chn(tx_chn);
if (ret) {
dev_err(dev, "Failed to cfg tchan %d\n", ret);
- goto err;
+ return ret;
}

k3_udma_glue_dump_tx_chn(tx_chn);

+ return 0;
+}
+
+struct k3_udma_glue_tx_channel *
+k3_udma_glue_request_tx_chn(struct device *dev, const char *name,
+ struct k3_udma_glue_tx_channel_cfg *cfg)
+{
+ struct k3_udma_glue_tx_channel *tx_chn;
+ int ret;
+
+ tx_chn = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*tx_chn), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!tx_chn)
+ return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+
+ tx_chn->common.dev = dev;
+ tx_chn->common.swdata_size = cfg->swdata_size;
+ tx_chn->tx_pause_on_err = cfg->tx_pause_on_err;
+ tx_chn->tx_filt_einfo = cfg->tx_filt_einfo;
+ tx_chn->tx_filt_pswords = cfg->tx_filt_pswords;
+ tx_chn->tx_supr_tdpkt = cfg->tx_supr_tdpkt;
+
+ /* parse of udmap channel */
+ ret = of_k3_udma_glue_parse_chn(dev->of_node, name,
+ &tx_chn->common, true);
+ if (ret)
+ goto err;
+
+ ret = k3_udma_glue_request_tx_chn_common(dev, tx_chn, cfg);
+ if (ret)
+ goto err;
+
return tx_chn;

err:
@@ -395,6 +410,40 @@ struct k3_udma_glue_tx_channel *k3_udma_glue_request_tx_chn(struct device *dev,
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(k3_udma_glue_request_tx_chn);

+struct k3_udma_glue_tx_channel *
+k3_udma_glue_request_tx_chn_by_id(struct device *dev, struct k3_udma_glue_tx_channel_cfg *cfg,
+ struct device_node *udmax_np, u32 thread_id)
+{
+ struct k3_udma_glue_tx_channel *tx_chn;
+ int ret;
+
+ tx_chn = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*tx_chn), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!tx_chn)
+ return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+
+ tx_chn->common.dev = dev;
+ tx_chn->common.swdata_size = cfg->swdata_size;
+ tx_chn->tx_pause_on_err = cfg->tx_pause_on_err;
+ tx_chn->tx_filt_einfo = cfg->tx_filt_einfo;
+ tx_chn->tx_filt_pswords = cfg->tx_filt_pswords;
+ tx_chn->tx_supr_tdpkt = cfg->tx_supr_tdpkt;
+
+ ret = of_k3_udma_glue_parse_chn_by_id(udmax_np, &tx_chn->common, true, thread_id);
+ if (ret)
+ goto err;
+
+ ret = k3_udma_glue_request_tx_chn_common(dev, tx_chn, cfg);
+ if (ret)
+ goto err;
+
+ return tx_chn;
+
+err:
+ k3_udma_glue_release_tx_chn(tx_chn);
+ return ERR_PTR(ret);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(k3_udma_glue_request_tx_chn_by_id);
+
void k3_udma_glue_release_tx_chn(struct k3_udma_glue_tx_channel *tx_chn)
{
if (tx_chn->psil_paired) {
diff --git a/include/linux/dma/k3-udma-glue.h b/include/linux/dma/k3-udma-glue.h
index e443be4d3b4b..6205d84430ca 100644
--- a/include/linux/dma/k3-udma-glue.h
+++ b/include/linux/dma/k3-udma-glue.h
@@ -26,6 +26,10 @@ struct k3_udma_glue_tx_channel;
struct k3_udma_glue_tx_channel *k3_udma_glue_request_tx_chn(struct device *dev,
const char *name, struct k3_udma_glue_tx_channel_cfg *cfg);

+struct k3_udma_glue_tx_channel *
+k3_udma_glue_request_tx_chn_by_id(struct device *dev, struct k3_udma_glue_tx_channel_cfg *cfg,
+ struct device_node *udmax_np, u32 thread_id);
+
void k3_udma_glue_release_tx_chn(struct k3_udma_glue_tx_channel *tx_chn);
int k3_udma_glue_push_tx_chn(struct k3_udma_glue_tx_channel *tx_chn,
struct cppi5_host_desc_t *desc_tx,
--
2.34.1


2023-12-14 15:41:34

by Péter Ujfalusi

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] dmaengine: ti: k3-udma-glue: Add function to request TX channel by ID



On 12/12/2023 13:10, Siddharth Vadapalli wrote:
> The existing function k3_udma_glue_request_tx_chn() supports requesting
> a TX DMA channel by its name. Add support to request TX channel by ID in
> the form of a new function k3_udma_glue_request_tx_chn_by_id() and export
> it for use by drivers which are probed by alternate methods (non
> device-tree) but still wish to make use of the existing DMA APIs. Such
> drivers could be informed about the TX channel to use by RPMsg for example.
>
> Since the implementation of k3_udma_glue_request_tx_chn_by_id() reuses
> most of the code in k3_udma_glue_request_tx_chn(), create a new function
> for the common code named as k3_udma_glue_request_tx_chn_common().
>
> Signed-off-by: Siddharth Vadapalli <[email protected]>
> ---
> Changes since v1:
> - Updated commit message indicating the use-case for which the patch is
> being added.
>
> drivers/dma/ti/k3-udma-glue.c | 101 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> include/linux/dma/k3-udma-glue.h | 4 ++
> 2 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/ti/k3-udma-glue.c b/drivers/dma/ti/k3-udma-glue.c
> index eff1ae3d3efe..ea5119a5e8eb 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/ti/k3-udma-glue.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/ti/k3-udma-glue.c
> @@ -274,29 +274,13 @@ static int k3_udma_glue_cfg_tx_chn(struct k3_udma_glue_tx_channel *tx_chn)
> return tisci_rm->tisci_udmap_ops->tx_ch_cfg(tisci_rm->tisci, &req);
> }
>
> -struct k3_udma_glue_tx_channel *k3_udma_glue_request_tx_chn(struct device *dev,
> - const char *name, struct k3_udma_glue_tx_channel_cfg *cfg)
> +static int
> +k3_udma_glue_request_tx_chn_common(struct device *dev,
> + struct k3_udma_glue_tx_channel *tx_chn,
> + struct k3_udma_glue_tx_channel_cfg *cfg)
> {
> - struct k3_udma_glue_tx_channel *tx_chn;
> int ret;
>
> - tx_chn = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*tx_chn), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!tx_chn)
> - return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> -
> - tx_chn->common.dev = dev;
> - tx_chn->common.swdata_size = cfg->swdata_size;
> - tx_chn->tx_pause_on_err = cfg->tx_pause_on_err;
> - tx_chn->tx_filt_einfo = cfg->tx_filt_einfo;
> - tx_chn->tx_filt_pswords = cfg->tx_filt_pswords;
> - tx_chn->tx_supr_tdpkt = cfg->tx_supr_tdpkt;
> -
> - /* parse of udmap channel */
> - ret = of_k3_udma_glue_parse_chn(dev->of_node, name,
> - &tx_chn->common, true);
> - if (ret)
> - goto err;
> -
> tx_chn->common.hdesc_size = cppi5_hdesc_calc_size(tx_chn->common.epib,
> tx_chn->common.psdata_size,
> tx_chn->common.swdata_size);
> @@ -312,7 +296,7 @@ struct k3_udma_glue_tx_channel *k3_udma_glue_request_tx_chn(struct device *dev,
> if (IS_ERR(tx_chn->udma_tchanx)) {
> ret = PTR_ERR(tx_chn->udma_tchanx);
> dev_err(dev, "UDMAX tchanx get err %d\n", ret);
> - goto err;
> + return ret;
> }
> tx_chn->udma_tchan_id = xudma_tchan_get_id(tx_chn->udma_tchanx);
>
> @@ -325,7 +309,7 @@ struct k3_udma_glue_tx_channel *k3_udma_glue_request_tx_chn(struct device *dev,
> dev_err(dev, "Channel Device registration failed %d\n", ret);
> put_device(&tx_chn->common.chan_dev);
> tx_chn->common.chan_dev.parent = NULL;
> - goto err;
> + return ret;
> }
>
> if (xudma_is_pktdma(tx_chn->common.udmax)) {
> @@ -349,7 +333,7 @@ struct k3_udma_glue_tx_channel *k3_udma_glue_request_tx_chn(struct device *dev,
> &tx_chn->ringtxcq);
> if (ret) {
> dev_err(dev, "Failed to get TX/TXCQ rings %d\n", ret);
> - goto err;
> + return ret;
> }
>
> /* Set the dma_dev for the rings to be configured */
> @@ -365,13 +349,13 @@ struct k3_udma_glue_tx_channel *k3_udma_glue_request_tx_chn(struct device *dev,
> ret = k3_ringacc_ring_cfg(tx_chn->ringtx, &cfg->tx_cfg);
> if (ret) {
> dev_err(dev, "Failed to cfg ringtx %d\n", ret);
> - goto err;
> + return ret;
> }
>
> ret = k3_ringacc_ring_cfg(tx_chn->ringtxcq, &cfg->txcq_cfg);
> if (ret) {
> dev_err(dev, "Failed to cfg ringtx %d\n", ret);
> - goto err;
> + return ret;
> }
>
> /* request and cfg psi-l */
> @@ -382,11 +366,42 @@ struct k3_udma_glue_tx_channel *k3_udma_glue_request_tx_chn(struct device *dev,
> ret = k3_udma_glue_cfg_tx_chn(tx_chn);
> if (ret) {
> dev_err(dev, "Failed to cfg tchan %d\n", ret);
> - goto err;
> + return ret;
> }
>
> k3_udma_glue_dump_tx_chn(tx_chn);
>
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +struct k3_udma_glue_tx_channel *
> +k3_udma_glue_request_tx_chn(struct device *dev, const char *name,
> + struct k3_udma_glue_tx_channel_cfg *cfg)
> +{
> + struct k3_udma_glue_tx_channel *tx_chn;
> + int ret;
> +
> + tx_chn = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*tx_chn), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!tx_chn)
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> +
> + tx_chn->common.dev = dev;
> + tx_chn->common.swdata_size = cfg->swdata_size;
> + tx_chn->tx_pause_on_err = cfg->tx_pause_on_err;
> + tx_chn->tx_filt_einfo = cfg->tx_filt_einfo;
> + tx_chn->tx_filt_pswords = cfg->tx_filt_pswords;
> + tx_chn->tx_supr_tdpkt = cfg->tx_supr_tdpkt;
> +
> + /* parse of udmap channel */
> + ret = of_k3_udma_glue_parse_chn(dev->of_node, name,
> + &tx_chn->common, true);
> + if (ret)
> + goto err;
> +
> + ret = k3_udma_glue_request_tx_chn_common(dev, tx_chn, cfg);
> + if (ret)
> + goto err;
> +
> return tx_chn;
>
> err:
> @@ -395,6 +410,40 @@ struct k3_udma_glue_tx_channel *k3_udma_glue_request_tx_chn(struct device *dev,
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(k3_udma_glue_request_tx_chn);
>
> +struct k3_udma_glue_tx_channel *
> +k3_udma_glue_request_tx_chn_by_id(struct device *dev, struct k3_udma_glue_tx_channel_cfg *cfg,
> + struct device_node *udmax_np, u32 thread_id)

udmax_np is not dev->of_node ?

> +{
> + struct k3_udma_glue_tx_channel *tx_chn;
> + int ret;
> +
> + tx_chn = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*tx_chn), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!tx_chn)
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> +
> + tx_chn->common.dev = dev;
> + tx_chn->common.swdata_size = cfg->swdata_size;
> + tx_chn->tx_pause_on_err = cfg->tx_pause_on_err;
> + tx_chn->tx_filt_einfo = cfg->tx_filt_einfo;
> + tx_chn->tx_filt_pswords = cfg->tx_filt_pswords;
> + tx_chn->tx_supr_tdpkt = cfg->tx_supr_tdpkt;
> +
> + ret = of_k3_udma_glue_parse_chn_by_id(udmax_np, &tx_chn->common, true, thread_id);
> + if (ret)
> + goto err;
> +
> + ret = k3_udma_glue_request_tx_chn_common(dev, tx_chn, cfg);
> + if (ret)
> + goto err;
> +
> + return tx_chn;
> +
> +err:
> + k3_udma_glue_release_tx_chn(tx_chn);
> + return ERR_PTR(ret);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(k3_udma_glue_request_tx_chn_by_id);
> +
> void k3_udma_glue_release_tx_chn(struct k3_udma_glue_tx_channel *tx_chn)
> {
> if (tx_chn->psil_paired) {
> diff --git a/include/linux/dma/k3-udma-glue.h b/include/linux/dma/k3-udma-glue.h
> index e443be4d3b4b..6205d84430ca 100644
> --- a/include/linux/dma/k3-udma-glue.h
> +++ b/include/linux/dma/k3-udma-glue.h
> @@ -26,6 +26,10 @@ struct k3_udma_glue_tx_channel;
> struct k3_udma_glue_tx_channel *k3_udma_glue_request_tx_chn(struct device *dev,
> const char *name, struct k3_udma_glue_tx_channel_cfg *cfg);
>
> +struct k3_udma_glue_tx_channel *
> +k3_udma_glue_request_tx_chn_by_id(struct device *dev, struct k3_udma_glue_tx_channel_cfg *cfg,

I know it is going to be longer, but can the function be named more
precisely?
k3_udma_glue_request_tx_chn_by_thread_id

For TX/RX: a channel is always for one thread, right?
Probably:
k3_udma_glue_request_tx_chn_for_thread_id()

?

Other then this the series looks OK.


> + struct device_node *udmax_np, u32 thread_id);
> +
> void k3_udma_glue_release_tx_chn(struct k3_udma_glue_tx_channel *tx_chn);
> int k3_udma_glue_push_tx_chn(struct k3_udma_glue_tx_channel *tx_chn,
> struct cppi5_host_desc_t *desc_tx,

--
Péter

2023-12-15 06:35:02

by Siddharth Vadapalli

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] dmaengine: ti: k3-udma-glue: Add function to request TX channel by ID

Hello Péter,

On 14/12/23 21:11, Péter Ujfalusi wrote:
>
>
> On 12/12/2023 13:10, Siddharth Vadapalli wrote:
>> The existing function k3_udma_glue_request_tx_chn() supports requesting
>> a TX DMA channel by its name. Add support to request TX channel by ID in
>> the form of a new function k3_udma_glue_request_tx_chn_by_id() and export
>> it for use by drivers which are probed by alternate methods (non
>> device-tree) but still wish to make use of the existing DMA APIs. Such
>> drivers could be informed about the TX channel to use by RPMsg for example.
>>
>> Since the implementation of k3_udma_glue_request_tx_chn_by_id() reuses
>> most of the code in k3_udma_glue_request_tx_chn(), create a new function
>> for the common code named as k3_udma_glue_request_tx_chn_common().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Siddharth Vadapalli <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> Changes since v1:
>> - Updated commit message indicating the use-case for which the patch is
>> being added.
>>
>> drivers/dma/ti/k3-udma-glue.c | 101 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>> include/linux/dma/k3-udma-glue.h | 4 ++
>> 2 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/dma/ti/k3-udma-glue.c b/drivers/dma/ti/k3-udma-glue.c
>> index eff1ae3d3efe..ea5119a5e8eb 100644
>> --- a/drivers/dma/ti/k3-udma-glue.c
>> +++ b/drivers/dma/ti/k3-udma-glue.c
>> @@ -274,29 +274,13 @@ static int k3_udma_glue_cfg_tx_chn(struct k3_udma_glue_tx_channel *tx_chn)
>> return tisci_rm->tisci_udmap_ops->tx_ch_cfg(tisci_rm->tisci, &req);
>> }
>>

...

>>
>> err:
>> @@ -395,6 +410,40 @@ struct k3_udma_glue_tx_channel *k3_udma_glue_request_tx_chn(struct device *dev,
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(k3_udma_glue_request_tx_chn);
>>
>> +struct k3_udma_glue_tx_channel *
>> +k3_udma_glue_request_tx_chn_by_id(struct device *dev, struct k3_udma_glue_tx_channel_cfg *cfg,
>> + struct device_node *udmax_np, u32 thread_id)
>
> udmax_np is not dev->of_node ?

I am not sure I fully understand the question. If you meant to ask if the driver
which uses this API will not have its device's of_node set to udmax_np, then yes
that's correct.

The driver shall be probed over RPMsg-bus, due to which its device's of_node
will not be udmax_np. Additionally, the udmax_np is the device-tree node of one
of the DMA Controllers described in the device-tree. The driver shall obtain the
reference to the udmax_np node using the API:
of_find_compatible_node()
with the compatible to be passed to the above API being a part of the driver's
data. Thus, it is possible to specify which DMA Controller to use by specifying
the compatible in the driver's data. I hope that I have answered your question.
Please let me know otherwise.

>
>> +{
>> + struct k3_udma_glue_tx_channel *tx_chn;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + tx_chn = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*tx_chn), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!tx_chn)
>> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>> +
>> + tx_chn->common.dev = dev;
>> + tx_chn->common.swdata_size = cfg->swdata_size;
>> + tx_chn->tx_pause_on_err = cfg->tx_pause_on_err;
>> + tx_chn->tx_filt_einfo = cfg->tx_filt_einfo;
>> + tx_chn->tx_filt_pswords = cfg->tx_filt_pswords;
>> + tx_chn->tx_supr_tdpkt = cfg->tx_supr_tdpkt;
>> +
>> + ret = of_k3_udma_glue_parse_chn_by_id(udmax_np, &tx_chn->common, true, thread_id);
>> + if (ret)
>> + goto err;
>> +
>> + ret = k3_udma_glue_request_tx_chn_common(dev, tx_chn, cfg);
>> + if (ret)
>> + goto err;
>> +
>> + return tx_chn;
>> +
>> +err:
>> + k3_udma_glue_release_tx_chn(tx_chn);
>> + return ERR_PTR(ret);
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(k3_udma_glue_request_tx_chn_by_id);
>> +
>> void k3_udma_glue_release_tx_chn(struct k3_udma_glue_tx_channel *tx_chn)
>> {
>> if (tx_chn->psil_paired) {
>> diff --git a/include/linux/dma/k3-udma-glue.h b/include/linux/dma/k3-udma-glue.h
>> index e443be4d3b4b..6205d84430ca 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/dma/k3-udma-glue.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/dma/k3-udma-glue.h
>> @@ -26,6 +26,10 @@ struct k3_udma_glue_tx_channel;
>> struct k3_udma_glue_tx_channel *k3_udma_glue_request_tx_chn(struct device *dev,
>> const char *name, struct k3_udma_glue_tx_channel_cfg *cfg);
>>
>> +struct k3_udma_glue_tx_channel *
>> +k3_udma_glue_request_tx_chn_by_id(struct device *dev, struct k3_udma_glue_tx_channel_cfg *cfg,
>
> I know it is going to be longer, but can the function be named more
> precisely?
> k3_udma_glue_request_tx_chn_by_thread_id
>
> For TX/RX: a channel is always for one thread, right?
> Probably:
> k3_udma_glue_request_tx_chn_for_thread_id()
>
> ?

Sure, I will rename it to:
k3_udma_glue_request_tx_chn_for_thread_id()
as suggested by you.

>
> Other then this the series looks OK.

Thank you for reviewing the series. I will rename the API as mentioned above and
if the question you had above regarding the of_node has been addressed, I will
post the v3 series. Kindly let me know.

--
Regards,
Siddharth.

2023-12-17 11:19:03

by Péter Ujfalusi

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] dmaengine: ti: k3-udma-glue: Add function to request TX channel by ID



On 15/12/2023 08:08, Siddharth Vadapalli wrote:
>>> err:
>>> @@ -395,6 +410,40 @@ struct k3_udma_glue_tx_channel *k3_udma_glue_request_tx_chn(struct device *dev,
>>> }
>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(k3_udma_glue_request_tx_chn);
>>>
>>> +struct k3_udma_glue_tx_channel *
>>> +k3_udma_glue_request_tx_chn_by_id(struct device *dev, struct k3_udma_glue_tx_channel_cfg *cfg,
>>> + struct device_node *udmax_np, u32 thread_id)
>>
>> udmax_np is not dev->of_node ?
>
> I am not sure I fully understand the question. If you meant to ask if the driver
> which uses this API will not have its device's of_node set to udmax_np, then yes
> that's correct.
>
> The driver shall be probed over RPMsg-bus, due to which its device's of_node
> will not be udmax_np. Additionally, the udmax_np is the device-tree node of one
> of the DMA Controllers described in the device-tree. The driver shall obtain the
> reference to the udmax_np node using the API:
> of_find_compatible_node()
> with the compatible to be passed to the above API being a part of the driver's
> data. Thus, it is possible to specify which DMA Controller to use by specifying
> the compatible in the driver's data. I hope that I have answered your question.
> Please let me know otherwise.

I see, thank you for the detailed explanation!

> Thank you for reviewing the series. I will rename the API as mentioned above and
> if the question you had above regarding the of_node has been addressed, I will
> post the v3 series. Kindly let me know.

I don't have other open issues, thanks for the updates

--
Péter

2023-12-18 04:31:14

by Siddharth Vadapalli

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] dmaengine: ti: k3-udma-glue: Add function to request TX channel by ID



On 17/12/23 16:48, Péter Ujfalusi wrote:
>
>
> On 15/12/2023 08:08, Siddharth Vadapalli wrote:
>>>> err:
>>>> @@ -395,6 +410,40 @@ struct k3_udma_glue_tx_channel *k3_udma_glue_request_tx_chn(struct device *dev,
>>>> }
>>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(k3_udma_glue_request_tx_chn);
>>>>
>>>> +struct k3_udma_glue_tx_channel *
>>>> +k3_udma_glue_request_tx_chn_by_id(struct device *dev, struct k3_udma_glue_tx_channel_cfg *cfg,
>>>> + struct device_node *udmax_np, u32 thread_id)
>>>
>>> udmax_np is not dev->of_node ?
>>
>> I am not sure I fully understand the question. If you meant to ask if the driver
>> which uses this API will not have its device's of_node set to udmax_np, then yes
>> that's correct.
>>
>> The driver shall be probed over RPMsg-bus, due to which its device's of_node
>> will not be udmax_np. Additionally, the udmax_np is the device-tree node of one
>> of the DMA Controllers described in the device-tree. The driver shall obtain the
>> reference to the udmax_np node using the API:
>> of_find_compatible_node()
>> with the compatible to be passed to the above API being a part of the driver's
>> data. Thus, it is possible to specify which DMA Controller to use by specifying
>> the compatible in the driver's data. I hope that I have answered your question.
>> Please let me know otherwise.
>
> I see, thank you for the detailed explanation!
>
>> Thank you for reviewing the series. I will rename the API as mentioned above and
>> if the question you had above regarding the of_node has been addressed, I will
>> post the v3 series. Kindly let me know.
>
> I don't have other open issues, thanks for the updates
>

Thank you for the confirmation. I will implement your suggestions and post the
v3 series.

--
Regards,
Siddharth.