The patch set proposes code cleanup and simplification changes for struct
iqk_matrix_regs_setting member variables. Resultant code is simpler and easier
to maintain.
Deepak R Varma (2):
staging: rtl8723bs: Simplify underutilized 2D array to 1D array
staging: rtl8723bs: Remove unused member variable
drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/HalPhyRf_8723B.c | 18 +++++++++---------
drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/odm.h | 3 +--
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
--
2.34.1
Member variable "Value" of structure iqk_matrix_regs_setting is
declared to be a 2D array of [3][IQK_Matrix_REG_NUM] grid. However
the primary index of this array is only used for index 0, the other
two elements are never used. Simplify this array to a one dimension
degree. The resultant code is simpler and is easy to maintain.
Suggested-by: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Deepak R Varma <[email protected]>
---
drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/HalPhyRf_8723B.c | 18 +++++++++---------
drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/odm.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/HalPhyRf_8723B.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/HalPhyRf_8723B.c
index a52748f7b56e..9317a4462c02 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/HalPhyRf_8723B.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/HalPhyRf_8723B.c
@@ -244,8 +244,8 @@ void ODM_TxPwrTrackSetPwr_8723B(
Final_CCK_Swing_Index = 0;
setIqkMatrix_8723B(pDM_Odm, Final_OFDM_Swing_Index, RFPath,
- pDM_Odm->RFCalibrateInfo.IQKMatrixRegSetting[ChannelMappedIndex].Value[0][0],
- pDM_Odm->RFCalibrateInfo.IQKMatrixRegSetting[ChannelMappedIndex].Value[0][1]);
+ pDM_Odm->RFCalibrateInfo.IQKMatrixRegSetting[ChannelMappedIndex].Value[0],
+ pDM_Odm->RFCalibrateInfo.IQKMatrixRegSetting[ChannelMappedIndex].Value[1]);
setCCKFilterCoefficient(pDM_Odm, Final_CCK_Swing_Index);
@@ -257,8 +257,8 @@ void ODM_TxPwrTrackSetPwr_8723B(
pDM_Odm->Remnant_OFDMSwingIdx[RFPath] = Final_OFDM_Swing_Index - PwrTrackingLimit_OFDM;
setIqkMatrix_8723B(pDM_Odm, PwrTrackingLimit_OFDM, RFPath,
- pDM_Odm->RFCalibrateInfo.IQKMatrixRegSetting[ChannelMappedIndex].Value[0][0],
- pDM_Odm->RFCalibrateInfo.IQKMatrixRegSetting[ChannelMappedIndex].Value[0][1]);
+ pDM_Odm->RFCalibrateInfo.IQKMatrixRegSetting[ChannelMappedIndex].Value[0],
+ pDM_Odm->RFCalibrateInfo.IQKMatrixRegSetting[ChannelMappedIndex].Value[1]);
pDM_Odm->Modify_TxAGC_Flag_PathA = true;
PHY_SetTxPowerIndexByRateSection(Adapter, RFPath, pHalData->CurrentChannel, OFDM);
@@ -267,16 +267,16 @@ void ODM_TxPwrTrackSetPwr_8723B(
pDM_Odm->Remnant_OFDMSwingIdx[RFPath] = Final_OFDM_Swing_Index;
setIqkMatrix_8723B(pDM_Odm, 0, RFPath,
- pDM_Odm->RFCalibrateInfo.IQKMatrixRegSetting[ChannelMappedIndex].Value[0][0],
- pDM_Odm->RFCalibrateInfo.IQKMatrixRegSetting[ChannelMappedIndex].Value[0][1]);
+ pDM_Odm->RFCalibrateInfo.IQKMatrixRegSetting[ChannelMappedIndex].Value[0],
+ pDM_Odm->RFCalibrateInfo.IQKMatrixRegSetting[ChannelMappedIndex].Value[1]);
pDM_Odm->Modify_TxAGC_Flag_PathA = true;
PHY_SetTxPowerIndexByRateSection(Adapter, RFPath, pHalData->CurrentChannel, OFDM);
PHY_SetTxPowerIndexByRateSection(Adapter, RFPath, pHalData->CurrentChannel, HT_MCS0_MCS7);
} else {
setIqkMatrix_8723B(pDM_Odm, Final_OFDM_Swing_Index, RFPath,
- pDM_Odm->RFCalibrateInfo.IQKMatrixRegSetting[ChannelMappedIndex].Value[0][0],
- pDM_Odm->RFCalibrateInfo.IQKMatrixRegSetting[ChannelMappedIndex].Value[0][1]);
+ pDM_Odm->RFCalibrateInfo.IQKMatrixRegSetting[ChannelMappedIndex].Value[0],
+ pDM_Odm->RFCalibrateInfo.IQKMatrixRegSetting[ChannelMappedIndex].Value[1]);
if (pDM_Odm->Modify_TxAGC_Flag_PathA) { /* If TxAGC has changed, reset TxAGC again */
pDM_Odm->Remnant_OFDMSwingIdx[RFPath] = 0;
@@ -1760,7 +1760,7 @@ void PHY_IQCalibrate_8723B(
/* by sherry 20120321 */
if (final_candidate < 4) {
for (i = 0; i < IQK_Matrix_REG_NUM; i++)
- pDM_Odm->RFCalibrateInfo.IQKMatrixRegSetting[0].Value[0][i] = result[final_candidate][i];
+ pDM_Odm->RFCalibrateInfo.IQKMatrixRegSetting[0].Value[i] = result[final_candidate][i];
pDM_Odm->RFCalibrateInfo.IQKMatrixRegSetting[0].bIQKDone = true;
}
diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/odm.h b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/odm.h
index fe9782d2d4fd..e16a769850c5 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/odm.h
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/odm.h
@@ -481,7 +481,7 @@ enum odm_type_alna_e { /* tag_ODM_TYPE_ALNA_Definition */
struct iqk_matrix_regs_setting { /* _IQK_MATRIX_REGS_SETTING */
bool bIQKDone;
- s32 Value[3][IQK_Matrix_REG_NUM];
+ s32 Value[IQK_Matrix_REG_NUM];
bool bBWIqkResultSaved[3];
};
--
2.34.1
On Sat, Nov 05, 2022 at 12:04:56AM +0530, Deepak R Varma wrote:
> Member variable "Value" of structure iqk_matrix_regs_setting is
> declared to be a 2D array of [3][IQK_Matrix_REG_NUM] grid. However
> the primary index of this array is only used for index 0, the other
> two elements are never used. Simplify this array to a one dimension
> degree. The resultant code is simpler and is easy to maintain.
>
> Suggested-by: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Deepak R Varma <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/HalPhyRf_8723B.c | 18 +++++++++---------
> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/odm.h | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/HalPhyRf_8723B.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/HalPhyRf_8723B.c
> index a52748f7b56e..9317a4462c02 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/HalPhyRf_8723B.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/HalPhyRf_8723B.c
> @@ -244,8 +244,8 @@ void ODM_TxPwrTrackSetPwr_8723B(
> Final_CCK_Swing_Index = 0;
>
> setIqkMatrix_8723B(pDM_Odm, Final_OFDM_Swing_Index, RFPath,
> - pDM_Odm->RFCalibrateInfo.IQKMatrixRegSetting[ChannelMappedIndex].Value[0][0],
> - pDM_Odm->RFCalibrateInfo.IQKMatrixRegSetting[ChannelMappedIndex].Value[0][1]);
> + pDM_Odm->RFCalibrateInfo.IQKMatrixRegSetting[ChannelMappedIndex].Value[0],
> + pDM_Odm->RFCalibrateInfo.IQKMatrixRegSetting[ChannelMappedIndex].Value[1]);
>
> setCCKFilterCoefficient(pDM_Odm, Final_CCK_Swing_Index);
>
> @@ -257,8 +257,8 @@ void ODM_TxPwrTrackSetPwr_8723B(
> pDM_Odm->Remnant_OFDMSwingIdx[RFPath] = Final_OFDM_Swing_Index - PwrTrackingLimit_OFDM;
>
> setIqkMatrix_8723B(pDM_Odm, PwrTrackingLimit_OFDM, RFPath,
> - pDM_Odm->RFCalibrateInfo.IQKMatrixRegSetting[ChannelMappedIndex].Value[0][0],
> - pDM_Odm->RFCalibrateInfo.IQKMatrixRegSetting[ChannelMappedIndex].Value[0][1]);
> + pDM_Odm->RFCalibrateInfo.IQKMatrixRegSetting[ChannelMappedIndex].Value[0],
> + pDM_Odm->RFCalibrateInfo.IQKMatrixRegSetting[ChannelMappedIndex].Value[1]);
>
> pDM_Odm->Modify_TxAGC_Flag_PathA = true;
> PHY_SetTxPowerIndexByRateSection(Adapter, RFPath, pHalData->CurrentChannel, OFDM);
> @@ -267,16 +267,16 @@ void ODM_TxPwrTrackSetPwr_8723B(
> pDM_Odm->Remnant_OFDMSwingIdx[RFPath] = Final_OFDM_Swing_Index;
>
> setIqkMatrix_8723B(pDM_Odm, 0, RFPath,
> - pDM_Odm->RFCalibrateInfo.IQKMatrixRegSetting[ChannelMappedIndex].Value[0][0],
> - pDM_Odm->RFCalibrateInfo.IQKMatrixRegSetting[ChannelMappedIndex].Value[0][1]);
> + pDM_Odm->RFCalibrateInfo.IQKMatrixRegSetting[ChannelMappedIndex].Value[0],
> + pDM_Odm->RFCalibrateInfo.IQKMatrixRegSetting[ChannelMappedIndex].Value[1]);
>
> pDM_Odm->Modify_TxAGC_Flag_PathA = true;
> PHY_SetTxPowerIndexByRateSection(Adapter, RFPath, pHalData->CurrentChannel, OFDM);
> PHY_SetTxPowerIndexByRateSection(Adapter, RFPath, pHalData->CurrentChannel, HT_MCS0_MCS7);
> } else {
> setIqkMatrix_8723B(pDM_Odm, Final_OFDM_Swing_Index, RFPath,
> - pDM_Odm->RFCalibrateInfo.IQKMatrixRegSetting[ChannelMappedIndex].Value[0][0],
> - pDM_Odm->RFCalibrateInfo.IQKMatrixRegSetting[ChannelMappedIndex].Value[0][1]);
> + pDM_Odm->RFCalibrateInfo.IQKMatrixRegSetting[ChannelMappedIndex].Value[0],
> + pDM_Odm->RFCalibrateInfo.IQKMatrixRegSetting[ChannelMappedIndex].Value[1]);
>
> if (pDM_Odm->Modify_TxAGC_Flag_PathA) { /* If TxAGC has changed, reset TxAGC again */
> pDM_Odm->Remnant_OFDMSwingIdx[RFPath] = 0;
> @@ -1760,7 +1760,7 @@ void PHY_IQCalibrate_8723B(
> /* by sherry 20120321 */
> if (final_candidate < 4) {
> for (i = 0; i < IQK_Matrix_REG_NUM; i++)
> - pDM_Odm->RFCalibrateInfo.IQKMatrixRegSetting[0].Value[0][i] = result[final_candidate][i];
> + pDM_Odm->RFCalibrateInfo.IQKMatrixRegSetting[0].Value[i] = result[final_candidate][i];
> pDM_Odm->RFCalibrateInfo.IQKMatrixRegSetting[0].bIQKDone = true;
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/odm.h b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/odm.h
> index fe9782d2d4fd..e16a769850c5 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/odm.h
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/odm.h
> @@ -481,7 +481,7 @@ enum odm_type_alna_e { /* tag_ODM_TYPE_ALNA_Definition */
>
> struct iqk_matrix_regs_setting { /* _IQK_MATRIX_REGS_SETTING */
> bool bIQKDone;
> - s32 Value[3][IQK_Matrix_REG_NUM];
> + s32 Value[IQK_Matrix_REG_NUM];
This field is used to store values (as your above patch shows), but
where is it actually used? Are you sure it is needed at all?
thanks,
greg k-h
On Sat, Nov 05, 2022 at 09:36:21AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 05, 2022 at 12:04:56AM +0530, Deepak R Varma wrote:
> > Member variable "Value" of structure iqk_matrix_regs_setting is
> > declared to be a 2D array of [3][IQK_Matrix_REG_NUM] grid. However
> > the primary index of this array is only used for index 0, the other
> > two elements are never used. Simplify this array to a one dimension
> > degree. The resultant code is simpler and is easy to maintain.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]>
> > Signed-off-by: Deepak R Varma <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/HalPhyRf_8723B.c | 18 +++++++++---------
> > drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/odm.h | 2 +-
> > 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/HalPhyRf_8723B.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/HalPhyRf_8723B.c
> > index a52748f7b56e..9317a4462c02 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/HalPhyRf_8723B.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/HalPhyRf_8723B.c
> > @@ -244,8 +244,8 @@ void ODM_TxPwrTrackSetPwr_8723B(
> > Final_CCK_Swing_Index = 0;
> >
> > setIqkMatrix_8723B(pDM_Odm, Final_OFDM_Swing_Index, RFPath,
> > - pDM_Odm->RFCalibrateInfo.IQKMatrixRegSetting[ChannelMappedIndex].Value[0][0],
> > - pDM_Odm->RFCalibrateInfo.IQKMatrixRegSetting[ChannelMappedIndex].Value[0][1]);
> > + pDM_Odm->RFCalibrateInfo.IQKMatrixRegSetting[ChannelMappedIndex].Value[0],
> > + pDM_Odm->RFCalibrateInfo.IQKMatrixRegSetting[ChannelMappedIndex].Value[1]);
> >
> > setCCKFilterCoefficient(pDM_Odm, Final_CCK_Swing_Index);
> >
> > @@ -257,8 +257,8 @@ void ODM_TxPwrTrackSetPwr_8723B(
> > pDM_Odm->Remnant_OFDMSwingIdx[RFPath] = Final_OFDM_Swing_Index - PwrTrackingLimit_OFDM;
> >
> > setIqkMatrix_8723B(pDM_Odm, PwrTrackingLimit_OFDM, RFPath,
> > - pDM_Odm->RFCalibrateInfo.IQKMatrixRegSetting[ChannelMappedIndex].Value[0][0],
> > - pDM_Odm->RFCalibrateInfo.IQKMatrixRegSetting[ChannelMappedIndex].Value[0][1]);
> > + pDM_Odm->RFCalibrateInfo.IQKMatrixRegSetting[ChannelMappedIndex].Value[0],
> > + pDM_Odm->RFCalibrateInfo.IQKMatrixRegSetting[ChannelMappedIndex].Value[1]);
> >
> > pDM_Odm->Modify_TxAGC_Flag_PathA = true;
> > PHY_SetTxPowerIndexByRateSection(Adapter, RFPath, pHalData->CurrentChannel, OFDM);
> > @@ -267,16 +267,16 @@ void ODM_TxPwrTrackSetPwr_8723B(
> > pDM_Odm->Remnant_OFDMSwingIdx[RFPath] = Final_OFDM_Swing_Index;
> >
> > setIqkMatrix_8723B(pDM_Odm, 0, RFPath,
> > - pDM_Odm->RFCalibrateInfo.IQKMatrixRegSetting[ChannelMappedIndex].Value[0][0],
> > - pDM_Odm->RFCalibrateInfo.IQKMatrixRegSetting[ChannelMappedIndex].Value[0][1]);
> > + pDM_Odm->RFCalibrateInfo.IQKMatrixRegSetting[ChannelMappedIndex].Value[0],
> > + pDM_Odm->RFCalibrateInfo.IQKMatrixRegSetting[ChannelMappedIndex].Value[1]);
> >
> > pDM_Odm->Modify_TxAGC_Flag_PathA = true;
> > PHY_SetTxPowerIndexByRateSection(Adapter, RFPath, pHalData->CurrentChannel, OFDM);
> > PHY_SetTxPowerIndexByRateSection(Adapter, RFPath, pHalData->CurrentChannel, HT_MCS0_MCS7);
> > } else {
> > setIqkMatrix_8723B(pDM_Odm, Final_OFDM_Swing_Index, RFPath,
> > - pDM_Odm->RFCalibrateInfo.IQKMatrixRegSetting[ChannelMappedIndex].Value[0][0],
> > - pDM_Odm->RFCalibrateInfo.IQKMatrixRegSetting[ChannelMappedIndex].Value[0][1]);
> > + pDM_Odm->RFCalibrateInfo.IQKMatrixRegSetting[ChannelMappedIndex].Value[0],
> > + pDM_Odm->RFCalibrateInfo.IQKMatrixRegSetting[ChannelMappedIndex].Value[1]);
> >
> > if (pDM_Odm->Modify_TxAGC_Flag_PathA) { /* If TxAGC has changed, reset TxAGC again */
> > pDM_Odm->Remnant_OFDMSwingIdx[RFPath] = 0;
> > @@ -1760,7 +1760,7 @@ void PHY_IQCalibrate_8723B(
> > /* by sherry 20120321 */
> > if (final_candidate < 4) {
> > for (i = 0; i < IQK_Matrix_REG_NUM; i++)
> > - pDM_Odm->RFCalibrateInfo.IQKMatrixRegSetting[0].Value[0][i] = result[final_candidate][i];
> > + pDM_Odm->RFCalibrateInfo.IQKMatrixRegSetting[0].Value[i] = result[final_candidate][i];
> > pDM_Odm->RFCalibrateInfo.IQKMatrixRegSetting[0].bIQKDone = true;
> > }
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/odm.h b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/odm.h
> > index fe9782d2d4fd..e16a769850c5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/odm.h
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/odm.h
> > @@ -481,7 +481,7 @@ enum odm_type_alna_e { /* tag_ODM_TYPE_ALNA_Definition */
> >
> > struct iqk_matrix_regs_setting { /* _IQK_MATRIX_REGS_SETTING */
> > bool bIQKDone;
> > - s32 Value[3][IQK_Matrix_REG_NUM];
> > + s32 Value[IQK_Matrix_REG_NUM];
>
> This field is used to store values (as your above patch shows), but
> where is it actually used? Are you sure it is needed at all?
Hi Greg,
For this driver, the values are passed onto setIqkMatrix_8723B() as arguments
and used inside this function. They are needed to be retained in the structure.
Thank you,
./drv
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
On Sat, Nov 05, 2022 at 02:14:12PM +0530, Deepak R Varma wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 05, 2022 at 09:36:21AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/odm.h b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/odm.h
> > > index fe9782d2d4fd..e16a769850c5 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/odm.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/odm.h
> > > @@ -481,7 +481,7 @@ enum odm_type_alna_e { /* tag_ODM_TYPE_ALNA_Definition */
> > >
> > > struct iqk_matrix_regs_setting { /* _IQK_MATRIX_REGS_SETTING */
> > > bool bIQKDone;
> > > - s32 Value[3][IQK_Matrix_REG_NUM];
> > > + s32 Value[IQK_Matrix_REG_NUM];
> >
> > This field is used to store values (as your above patch shows), but
> > where is it actually used? Are you sure it is needed at all?
>
> Hi Greg,
> For this driver, the values are passed onto setIqkMatrix_8723B() as arguments
> and used inside this function. They are needed to be retained in the structure.
Hello Greg,
Upon further review of the structure, I observed that the member "bIQKDone" is
also not used anywhere in the code and it can be removed as well. That cleanup
will lead to replacing this entire structure by a simple one dimensional 'Value"
array.
Please suggest if I should make that change and send in a revision?
Thank you,
./drv
>
> Thank you,
> ./drv
>
>
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
> >
>
>
>
On Sat, Nov 05, 2022 at 02:47:49PM +0530, Deepak R Varma wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 05, 2022 at 02:14:12PM +0530, Deepak R Varma wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 05, 2022 at 09:36:21AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/odm.h b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/odm.h
> > > > index fe9782d2d4fd..e16a769850c5 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/odm.h
> > > > +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/odm.h
> > > > @@ -481,7 +481,7 @@ enum odm_type_alna_e { /* tag_ODM_TYPE_ALNA_Definition */
> > > >
> > > > struct iqk_matrix_regs_setting { /* _IQK_MATRIX_REGS_SETTING */
> > > > bool bIQKDone;
> > > > - s32 Value[3][IQK_Matrix_REG_NUM];
> > > > + s32 Value[IQK_Matrix_REG_NUM];
> > >
> > > This field is used to store values (as your above patch shows), but
> > > where is it actually used? Are you sure it is needed at all?
> >
> > Hi Greg,
> > For this driver, the values are passed onto setIqkMatrix_8723B() as arguments
> > and used inside this function. They are needed to be retained in the structure.
>
> Hello Greg,
> Upon further review of the structure, I observed that the member "bIQKDone" is
> also not used anywhere in the code and it can be removed as well. That cleanup
> will lead to replacing this entire structure by a simple one dimensional 'Value"
> array.
>
> Please suggest if I should make that change and send in a revision?
Yes, that would be a better overall change.
thanks,
greg k-h
On Tue, Nov 08, 2022 at 04:19:41PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 05, 2022 at 02:47:49PM +0530, Deepak R Varma wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 05, 2022 at 02:14:12PM +0530, Deepak R Varma wrote:
> > Hello Greg,
> > Upon further review of the structure, I observed that the member "bIQKDone" is
> > also not used anywhere in the code and it can be removed as well. That cleanup
> > will lead to replacing this entire structure by a simple one dimensional 'Value"
> > array.
> >
> > Please suggest if I should make that change and send in a revision?
>
> Yes, that would be a better overall change.
Hello Greg,
The patch is resubmitted earlier with following subject:
[PATCH v2] staging: rtl8723bs: replace underutilized struct by array variable
Thank you,
./drv
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>