2023-04-26 23:27:49

by Eric Biggers

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] Implement GCM ghash using Zbc and Zbkb extensions

On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 01:20:31AM +0200, Heiko St?bner wrote:
> But for me, this small bit of scalar crypto is also sort of a stepping
> stone :-). Previous versions [0] already included patches using the
> vector crypto extensions too, I just split that into a separate thing,
> as _this_ series actually uses ratified extensions :-)
>
>
> Heiko
>
>
>
> [0] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/

That patchset wasn't sent to linux-crypto. Can you make sure to include
[email protected] on any subsequent patchsets? Thanks!

- Eric


2023-04-26 23:29:32

by Heiko Stübner

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] Implement GCM ghash using Zbc and Zbkb extensions

Hi,

Am Donnerstag, 27. April 2023, 01:23:31 CEST schrieb Eric Biggers:
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 01:20:31AM +0200, Heiko St?bner wrote:
> > But for me, this small bit of scalar crypto is also sort of a stepping
> > stone :-). Previous versions [0] already included patches using the
> > vector crypto extensions too, I just split that into a separate thing,
> > as _this_ series actually uses ratified extensions :-)
> >
> >
> > Heiko
> >
> >
> >
> > [0] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/
>
> That patchset wasn't sent to linux-crypto. Can you make sure to include
> [email protected] on any subsequent patchsets? Thanks!

yeah, that was a fault on my part, which I managed to rectify with v4 here
[haven't had time to send the vector part as separate v4 yet]

Will include linux-crypto in further submissions.


Heiko