On Mon, 20 Feb 2017, Dou Liyang wrote:
Please make your subject line short and a precise summary phrase, not an
overlong sentence.
> After we revert the the mapping of "cpuid <-> nodeid" fixed at the
> booting time. and do it at the hot-plug time. we should also do the
> verification of duplicate proc_id at the time.
The revert is completely irrelevant to this change, really. The reference
is just confusing.
> The patch rename the verfication function and move it to
> drivers/acpi::acpi_processor_get_info.
See previous mails ....
Let me give you another changelog example:
Subject: acpi/processor: Check for duplicate processor ids at hotplug time
The check for duplicate processor ids happens at boot time based on the
ACPI table contents, but the final sanity checks for a processor happen
at hotplug time.
At hotplug time, where the physical information is available, which might
differ from the ACPI table information, a check for duplicate processor
ids is missing.
Add it to the hotplug checks and rename the function so it better
reflects its purpose.
Hmm?
>
> -bool __init acpi_processor_validate_proc_id(int proc_id)
> +bool duplicate_processor_id(int proc_id)
Please keep the acpi_ prefix. acpi_duplicate_processor_id().
Thanks,
tglx
Hi tglx,
At 03/01/2017 07:26 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Feb 2017, Dou Liyang wrote:
>
> Please make your subject line short and a precise summary phrase, not an
> overlong sentence.
>
>> After we revert the the mapping of "cpuid <-> nodeid" fixed at the
>> booting time. and do it at the hot-plug time. we should also do the
>> verification of duplicate proc_id at the time.
>
> The revert is completely irrelevant to this change, really. The reference
> is just confusing.
>
Yes, Maybe I should split them like before.
>> The patch rename the verfication function and move it to
>> drivers/acpi::acpi_processor_get_info.
>
> See previous mails ....
>
> Let me give you another changelog example:
>
Thanks again.
> Subject: acpi/processor: Check for duplicate processor ids at hotplug time
>
> The check for duplicate processor ids happens at boot time based on the
> ACPI table contents, but the final sanity checks for a processor happen
> at hotplug time.
>
> At hotplug time, where the physical information is available, which might
> differ from the ACPI table information, a check for duplicate processor
> ids is missing.
>
> Add it to the hotplug checks and rename the function so it better
> reflects its purpose.
>
> Hmm?
Yes, thanks again. I learned a lot in that patchset.
>
>>
>> -bool __init acpi_processor_validate_proc_id(int proc_id)
>> +bool duplicate_processor_id(int proc_id)
>
> Please keep the acpi_ prefix. acpi_duplicate_processor_id().
OK, I will.
Thanks,
Liyang.
>
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
>
>
>