2023-02-20 21:23:13

by Guilherme G. Piccoli

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v4] alpha: Clean-up the panic notifier code

The alpha panic notifier has some code issues, not following
the conventions of other notifiers. Also, it might halt the
machine but still it is set to run as early as possible, which
doesn't seem to be a good idea.

So, let's clean the code and set the notifier to run as the
latest, following the same approach other architectures are
doing - also, remove the unnecessary include of a header already
included indirectly.

Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky <[email protected]>
Cc: Matt Turner <[email protected]>
Cc: Richard Henderson <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Guilherme G. Piccoli <[email protected]>

---


V4:
- Rebased (and build-tested) against v6.2.

V3:
- No changes.

V2:
- Fixed rth email address;
- Added Petr's review tag - thanks!


arch/alpha/kernel/setup.c | 36 +++++++++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/alpha/kernel/setup.c b/arch/alpha/kernel/setup.c
index 33bf3a627002..1eb67a67823f 100644
--- a/arch/alpha/kernel/setup.c
+++ b/arch/alpha/kernel/setup.c
@@ -41,19 +41,11 @@
#include <linux/sysrq.h>
#include <linux/reboot.h>
#endif
-#include <linux/notifier.h>
#include <asm/setup.h>
#include <asm/io.h>
#include <linux/log2.h>
#include <linux/export.h>

-static int alpha_panic_event(struct notifier_block *, unsigned long, void *);
-static struct notifier_block alpha_panic_block = {
- alpha_panic_event,
- NULL,
- INT_MAX /* try to do it first */
-};
-
#include <linux/uaccess.h>
#include <asm/hwrpb.h>
#include <asm/dma.h>
@@ -435,6 +427,21 @@ static const struct sysrq_key_op srm_sysrq_reboot_op = {
};
#endif

+static int alpha_panic_event(struct notifier_block *this,
+ unsigned long event, void *ptr)
+{
+ /* If we are using SRM and serial console, just hard halt here. */
+ if (alpha_using_srm && srmcons_output)
+ __halt();
+
+ return NOTIFY_DONE;
+}
+
+static struct notifier_block alpha_panic_block = {
+ .notifier_call = alpha_panic_event,
+ .priority = INT_MIN, /* may not return, do it last */
+};
+
void __init
setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
{
@@ -1427,19 +1434,6 @@ const struct seq_operations cpuinfo_op = {
.show = show_cpuinfo,
};

-
-static int
-alpha_panic_event(struct notifier_block *this, unsigned long event, void *ptr)
-{
-#if 1
- /* FIXME FIXME FIXME */
- /* If we are using SRM and serial console, just hard halt here. */
- if (alpha_using_srm && srmcons_output)
- __halt();
-#endif
- return NOTIFY_DONE;
-}
-
static __init int add_pcspkr(void)
{
struct platform_device *pd;
--
2.39.1



2023-03-13 20:41:05

by Matt Turner

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] alpha: Clean-up the panic notifier code

On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 4:18 PM Guilherme G. Piccoli
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 20/02/2023 18:22, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote:
> > The alpha panic notifier has some code issues, not following
> > the conventions of other notifiers. Also, it might halt the
> > machine but still it is set to run as early as possible, which
> > doesn't seem to be a good idea.
> >
> > So, let's clean the code and set the notifier to run as the
> > latest, following the same approach other architectures are
> > doing - also, remove the unnecessary include of a header already
> > included indirectly.
> >
> > Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Matt Turner <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Richard Henderson <[email protected]>
> > Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <[email protected]>
> > Signed-off-by: Guilherme G. Piccoli <[email protected]>
> >
> > ---
> >
> >
> > V4:
> > - Rebased (and build-tested) against v6.2.
> >
> > V3:
> > - No changes.
> >
> > V2:
> > - Fixed rth email address;
> > - Added Petr's review tag - thanks!
> >
>
> Hi folks, just a gentle ping.
> Lemme know if there's anything I could do in order to get this move forward.
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
>
> Guilherme

My apologies. I meant to include this in my last pull request.

I'll take it through my tree.

Thanks,
Matt

2023-03-13 20:57:32

by Guilherme G. Piccoli

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] alpha: Clean-up the panic notifier code

On 13/03/2023 17:39, Matt Turner wrote:
> [...]
> My apologies. I meant to include this in my last pull request.
>
> I'll take it through my tree.
>
> Thanks,
> Matt

Hi Matt, no need for apologies - thanks for including!
Cheers,


Guilherme

2023-03-13 21:03:05

by Guilherme G. Piccoli

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] alpha: Clean-up the panic notifier code

On 20/02/2023 18:22, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote:
> The alpha panic notifier has some code issues, not following
> the conventions of other notifiers. Also, it might halt the
> machine but still it is set to run as early as possible, which
> doesn't seem to be a good idea.
>
> So, let's clean the code and set the notifier to run as the
> latest, following the same approach other architectures are
> doing - also, remove the unnecessary include of a header already
> included indirectly.
>
> Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky <[email protected]>
> Cc: Matt Turner <[email protected]>
> Cc: Richard Henderson <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Guilherme G. Piccoli <[email protected]>
>
> ---
>
>
> V4:
> - Rebased (and build-tested) against v6.2.
>
> V3:
> - No changes.
>
> V2:
> - Fixed rth email address;
> - Added Petr's review tag - thanks!
>

Hi folks, just a gentle ping.
Lemme know if there's anything I could do in order to get this move forward.

Thanks in advance,


Guilherme