This patch adds timing settings for samsung2GbX8 and
fixes the cmdset settings. samsung2GbX8 is large page.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <[email protected]>
---
drivers/mtd/nand/pxa3xx_nand.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/pxa3xx_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/pxa3xx_nand.c
index 4d89f37..47c0442 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/pxa3xx_nand.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/pxa3xx_nand.c
@@ -227,9 +227,21 @@ static struct pxa3xx_nand_flash samsung512MbX16 = {
.chip_id = 0x46ec,
};
+static struct pxa3xx_nand_timing samsung2GbX8_timing = {
+ .tCH = 5,
+ .tCS = 20,
+ .tWH = 10,
+ .tWP = 12,
+ .tRH = 10,
+ .tRP = 12,
+ .tR = 25000,
+ .tWHR = 60,
+ .tAR = 10,
+};
+
static struct pxa3xx_nand_flash samsung2GbX8 = {
- .timing = &samsung512MbX16_timing,
- .cmdset = &smallpage_cmdset,
+ .timing = &samsung2GbX8_timing,
+ .cmdset = &largepage_cmdset,
.page_per_block = 64,
.page_size = 2048,
.flash_width = 8,
--
1.7.2
Cc'ed Lei and Haojian.
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Axel Lin <[email protected]> wrote:
> This patch adds timing settings for samsung2GbX8 and
> fixes the cmdset settings. samsung2GbX8 is large page.
>
> Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/nand/pxa3xx_nand.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
> 1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/pxa3xx_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/pxa3xx_nand.c
> index 4d89f37..47c0442 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/pxa3xx_nand.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/pxa3xx_nand.c
> @@ -227,9 +227,21 @@ static struct pxa3xx_nand_flash samsung512MbX16 = {
> .chip_id = 0x46ec,
> };
>
> +static struct pxa3xx_nand_timing samsung2GbX8_timing = {
> + .tCH = 5,
> + .tCS = 20,
> + .tWH = 10,
> + .tWP = 12,
> + .tRH = 10,
> + .tRP = 12,
> + .tR = 25000,
> + .tWHR = 60,
> + .tAR = 10,
> +};
> +
> static struct pxa3xx_nand_flash samsung2GbX8 = {
> - .timing = &samsung512MbX16_timing,
> - .cmdset = &smallpage_cmdset,
> + .timing = &samsung2GbX8_timing,
> + .cmdset = &largepage_cmdset,
> .page_per_block = 64,
> .page_size = 2048,
> .flash_width = 8,
> --
> 1.7.2
>
>
>
>
Hi Axel,
I suggest not merge your patch into mainline code. Since I have a large series of patch which reconstruct the nand flash definition, this fix would no longer be needed.
Thanks,
Lei
-----Original Message-----
From: Eric Miao [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: 2010年8月16日 20:22
To: Axel Lin
Cc: linux-kernel; David Woodhouse; [email protected]; Lei Wen; Haojian Zhuang
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [MTD] [NAND] pxa3xx: fix timing and cmdset for samsung2GbX8
Cc'ed Lei and Haojian.
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Axel Lin <[email protected]> wrote:
> This patch adds timing settings for samsung2GbX8 and
> fixes the cmdset settings. samsung2GbX8 is large page.
>
> Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/nand/pxa3xx_nand.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
> 1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/pxa3xx_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/pxa3xx_nand.c
> index 4d89f37..47c0442 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/pxa3xx_nand.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/pxa3xx_nand.c
> @@ -227,9 +227,21 @@ static struct pxa3xx_nand_flash samsung512MbX16 = {
> .chip_id = 0x46ec,
> };
>
> +static struct pxa3xx_nand_timing samsung2GbX8_timing = {
> + .tCH = 5,
> + .tCS = 20,
> + .tWH = 10,
> + .tWP = 12,
> + .tRH = 10,
> + .tRP = 12,
> + .tR = 25000,
> + .tWHR = 60,
> + .tAR = 10,
> +};
> +
> static struct pxa3xx_nand_flash samsung2GbX8 = {
> - .timing = &samsung512MbX16_timing,
> - .cmdset = &smallpage_cmdset,
> + .timing = &samsung2GbX8_timing,
> + .cmdset = &largepage_cmdset,
> .page_per_block = 64,
> .page_size = 2048,
> .flash_width = 8,
> --
> 1.7.2
>
>
>
>
????{.n?+???????+%?????ݶ??w??{.n?+????{??G?????{ay? ʇڙ?,j??f???h?????????z_??(?階?ݢj"???m??????G????????????&???~???iO???z??v?^?m???? ????????I?
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 8:34 PM, Lei Wen <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Axel,
>
> I suggest not merge your patch into mainline code. Since I have a large series of patch which reconstruct the nand flash definition, this fix would no longer be needed.
>
Lei, would you please point the URL of the patch series (possibly by
searching linux-mtd archive or some other mailing list archive) so that
Axel can have a reference and be involved?
- eric
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2010-July/subject.html
They're re-posted in July. Please search the subjects in that page. They're totally 29 patches.
By the way, David, what's the result of review on these patches? We already posted for several times.
Thanks
Haojian
-----Original Message-----
From: Eric Miao [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: 2010年8月16日 8:44 PM
To: Lei Wen
Cc: Axel Lin; linux-kernel; David Woodhouse; [email protected]; Haojian Zhuang
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [MTD] [NAND] pxa3xx: fix timing and cmdset for samsung2GbX8
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 8:34 PM, Lei Wen <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Axel,
>
> I suggest not merge your patch into mainline code. Since I have a large series of patch which reconstruct the nand flash definition, this fix would no longer be needed.
>
Lei, would you please point the URL of the patch series (possibly by
searching linux-mtd archive or some other mailing list archive) so that
Axel can have a reference and be involved?
- eric
????{.n?+???????+%?????ݶ??w??{.n?+????{??G?????{ay? ʇڙ?,j??f???h?????????z_??(?階?ݢj"???m??????G????????????&???~???iO???z??v?^?m???? ????????I?
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 8:49 PM, Haojian Zhuang <[email protected]> wrote:
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2010-July/subject.html
>
> They're re-posted in July. Please search the subjects in that page. They're totally 29 patches.
>
> By the way, David, what's the result of review on these patches? We already posted for several times.
>
I've actually reviewed some of the patches and gave my Ack. For those
patches, I think they can be merged early.
And overall, they look good. Yet 29 patch in a whole is still a bit too
much, would be good to see them logically be separated into several
patch series.
> Thanks
> Haojian
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric Miao [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: 2010年8月16日 8:44 PM
> To: Lei Wen
> Cc: Axel Lin; linux-kernel; David Woodhouse; [email protected]; Haojian Zhuang
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] [MTD] [NAND] pxa3xx: fix timing and cmdset for samsung2GbX8
>
> On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 8:34 PM, Lei Wen <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hi Axel,
>>
>> I suggest not merge your patch into mainline code. Since I have a large series of patch which reconstruct the nand flash definition, this fix would no longer be needed.
>>
>
> Lei, would you please point the URL of the patch series (possibly by
> searching linux-mtd archive or some other mailing list archive) so that
> Axel can have a reference and be involved?
>
> - eric
>
On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 20:55 +0800, Eric Miao wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 8:49 PM, Haojian Zhuang <[email protected]> wrote:
> > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2010-July/subject.html
> >
> > They're re-posted in July. Please search the subjects in that page. They're totally 29 patches.
> >
> > By the way, David, what's the result of review on these patches? We already posted for several times.
> >
>
> I've actually reviewed some of the patches and gave my Ack. For those
> patches, I think they can be merged early.
>
> And overall, they look good. Yet 29 patch in a whole is still a bit too
> much, would be good to see them logically be separated into several
> patch series.
You had some criticism of patch #1 in the sequence, and some questions.
I didn't look much harder than that, iirc... although looking back now
it seems that the rest of your responses to the sequence were largely
positive.
Are you happy with the first patch, and if so shall I go ahead and
import the whole sequence with your Acked-By:?
--
David Woodhouse Open Source Technology Centre
[email protected] Intel Corporation
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 9:05 PM, David Woodhouse <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 20:55 +0800, Eric Miao wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 8:49 PM, Haojian Zhuang <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2010-July/subject.html
>> >
>> > They're re-posted in July. Please search the subjects in that page. They're totally 29 patches.
>> >
>> > By the way, David, what's the result of review on these patches? We already posted for several times.
>> >
>>
>> I've actually reviewed some of the patches and gave my Ack. For those
>> patches, I think they can be merged early.
>>
>> And overall, they look good. Yet 29 patch in a whole is still a bit too
>> much, would be good to see them logically be separated into several
>> patch series.
>
> You had some criticism of patch #1 in the sequence, and some questions.
>
So they need to be addressed. Lei, could you please come up with
an updated patch?
> I didn't look much harder than that, iirc... although looking back now
> it seems that the rest of your responses to the sequence were largely
> positive.
>
> Are you happy with the first patch, and if so shall I go ahead and
> import the whole sequence with your Acked-By:?
>
I'm generally OK, but still think it would be good to have another around
of review before they can be merged.
Eric,
The first patch is a bit of fundamental. I'm afraid that modify it would bring changes to all latter patches in this series...
So I think I would repost another round of updating patch series and hope that would be merged. How do you think about this?
Thanks,
Lei
-----Original Message-----
From: Eric Miao [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: 2010??8??16?? 21:55
To: David Woodhouse
Cc: Haojian Zhuang; Lei Wen; Axel Lin; linux-kernel; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [MTD] [NAND] pxa3xx: fix timing and cmdset for samsung2GbX8
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 9:05 PM, David Woodhouse <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 20:55 +0800, Eric Miao wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 8:49 PM, Haojian Zhuang <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2010-July/subject.html
>> >
>> > They're re-posted in July. Please search the subjects in that page. They're totally 29 patches.
>> >
>> > By the way, David, what's the result of review on these patches? We already posted for several times.
>> >
>>
>> I've actually reviewed some of the patches and gave my Ack. For those
>> patches, I think they can be merged early.
>>
>> And overall, they look good. Yet 29 patch in a whole is still a bit too
>> much, would be good to see them logically be separated into several
>> patch series.
>
> You had some criticism of patch #1 in the sequence, and some questions.
>
So they need to be addressed. Lei, could you please come up with
an updated patch?
> I didn't look much harder than that, iirc... although looking back now
> it seems that the rest of your responses to the sequence were largely
> positive.
>
> Are you happy with the first patch, and if so shall I go ahead and
> import the whole sequence with your Acked-By:?
>
I'm generally OK, but still think it would be good to have another around
of review before they can be merged.
????{.n?+???????+%?????ݶ??w??{.n?+????{??G?????{ay? ʇڙ?,j??f???h?????????z_??(?階?ݢj"???m??????G????????????&???~???iO???z??v?^?m???? ????????I?
2010/8/16 Lei Wen <[email protected]>:
> Eric,
> The first patch is a bit of fundamental. I'm afraid that modify it would bring changes to all latter patches in this series...
>
> So I think I would repost another round of updating patch series and hope that would be merged. How do you think about this?
>
Please separate the patches into several patch series.
(PS: I'll possibly talk with you on this tomorrow F2F)
I may not have time from 10am to 11am. Except that, any time is ok for me. :-)
Best regards,
Lei
-----Original Message-----
From: Eric Miao [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: 2010??8??16?? 22:17
To: Lei Wen
Cc: David Woodhouse; Haojian Zhuang; Axel Lin; linux-kernel; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [MTD] [NAND] pxa3xx: fix timing and cmdset for samsung2GbX8
2010/8/16 Lei Wen <[email protected]>:
> Eric,
> The first patch is a bit of fundamental. I'm afraid that modify it would bring changes to all latter patches in this series...
>
> So I think I would repost another round of updating patch series and hope that would be merged. How do you think about this?
>
Please separate the patches into several patch series.
(PS: I'll possibly talk with you on this tomorrow F2F)
????{.n?+???????+%?????ݶ??w??{.n?+????{??G?????{ay? ʇڙ?,j??f???h?????????z_??(?階?ݢj"???m??????G????????????&???~???iO???z??v?^?m???? ????????I?