A struct member variable is set to different values without having used in between.
This was found using a static code analysis program called cppcheck
Signed-off-by: Rickard Strandqvist <[email protected]>
---
drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm80xx_hwi.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm80xx_hwi.c b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm80xx_hwi.c
index d70587f..2698227 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm80xx_hwi.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm80xx_hwi.c
@@ -249,7 +249,6 @@ moreData:
sprintf(pm8001_ha->
forensic_info.data_buf.direct_data,
"%08x ", 4);
- pm8001_ha->forensic_info.data_buf.read_len = 0xFFFFFFFF;
pm8001_ha->forensic_info.data_buf.direct_len = 0;
pm8001_ha->forensic_info.data_buf.direct_offset = 0;
pm8001_ha->forensic_info.data_buf.read_len = 0;
--
1.7.10.4
This one looks good to me,
Reviewed-by: Maurizio Lombardi <[email protected]>
On 06/25/2014 04:01 PM, Rickard Strandqvist wrote:
> A struct member variable is set to different values without having used in between.
>
> This was found using a static code analysis program called cppcheck
>
> Signed-off-by: Rickard Strandqvist <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm80xx_hwi.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm80xx_hwi.c b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm80xx_hwi.c
> index d70587f..2698227 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm80xx_hwi.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm80xx_hwi.c
> @@ -249,7 +249,6 @@ moreData:
> sprintf(pm8001_ha->
> forensic_info.data_buf.direct_data,
> "%08x ", 4);
> - pm8001_ha->forensic_info.data_buf.read_len = 0xFFFFFFFF;
> pm8001_ha->forensic_info.data_buf.direct_len = 0;
> pm8001_ha->forensic_info.data_buf.direct_offset = 0;
> pm8001_ha->forensic_info.data_buf.read_len = 0;
>
Thanks Rickard,
>From my point of view, looks good, but I'd like to get review from Anand
(cc-ed).
Anand, could you share your opinion?
Regards,
Jack
On 06/25/2014 04:01 PM, Rickard Strandqvist wrote:
> A struct member variable is set to different values without having used in between.
>
> This was found using a static code analysis program called cppcheck
>
> Signed-off-by: Rickard Strandqvist <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm80xx_hwi.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm80xx_hwi.c b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm80xx_hwi.c
> index d70587f..2698227 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm80xx_hwi.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm80xx_hwi.c
> @@ -249,7 +249,6 @@ moreData:
> sprintf(pm8001_ha->
> forensic_info.data_buf.direct_data,
> "%08x ", 4);
> - pm8001_ha->forensic_info.data_buf.read_len = 0xFFFFFFFF;
> pm8001_ha->forensic_info.data_buf.direct_len = 0;
> pm8001_ha->forensic_info.data_buf.direct_offset = 0;
> pm8001_ha->forensic_info.data_buf.read_len = 0;
>
On 06/26/2014 10:09 AM, Jack Wang wrote:
> Thanks Rickard,
>
> From my point of view, looks good, but I'd like to get review from Anand
> (cc-ed).
I would like to add that I noticed that this fields is only set and appears to be never used,
maybe it could be completely removed.
Regards,
Maurizio Lombardi
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 1:50 PM, Maurizio Lombardi <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 06/26/2014 10:09 AM, Jack Wang wrote:
>> Thanks Rickard,
>>
>> From my point of view, looks good, but I'd like to get review from Anand
>> (cc-ed).
>
> I would like to add that I noticed that this fields is only set and appears to be never used,
> maybe it could be completely removed.
You are correct. The whole forensic_info structure itself is not used or referred anywhere. I will remove it and send a patch.
Regards,
Suresh Thiagarajan
>
> Regards,
> Maurizio Lombardi
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html