2014-10-01 07:43:23

by Linus Walleij

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] gpio: remove remaining users of gpiochip_remove() retval

On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 4:15 PM, Pramod Gurav
<[email protected]> wrote:

> Some driver in gpio still check for return value from gpiochip_remove
> Get rid of the check for return value.
>
> Cc: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
> Cc: Alexandre Courbot <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
>
> Signed-off-by: Pramod Gurav <[email protected]>

This is already fixed in the GPIO tree, and in linux-next.

I have got more patches like this from other people, and cannot
quite understand what kind of tree you are actually looking at?

Yours,
Linus Walleij


2014-10-01 07:48:44

by Pramod Gurav

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] gpio: remove remaining users of gpiochip_remove() retval

On Wednesday 01 October 2014 01:13 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 4:15 PM, Pramod Gurav
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Some driver in gpio still check for return value from gpiochip_remove
>> Get rid of the check for return value.
>>
>> Cc: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
>> Cc: Alexandre Courbot <[email protected]>
>> Cc: [email protected]
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pramod Gurav <[email protected]>
>
> This is already fixed in the GPIO tree, and in linux-next.
>
> I have got more patches like this from other people, and cannot
> quite understand what kind of tree you are actually looking at?
>
Sorry for this Linus. I have applied these patches on linux-next's
3.17-rc6. Just checked the other patch fixing these have come after rc6.
Should have done on master or gpio tree master.

Will be more careful next time.

> Yours,
> Linus Walleij
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>