2021-02-23 15:59:24

by Alan Stern

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: usb: generic-ehci: document ignore-oc flag

On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 04:50:04PM +0100, ?lvaro Fern?ndez Rojas wrote:
> Over-current reporting isn't supported on some platforms such as bcm63xx.
> These devices will incorrectly report over-current if this flag isn't properly
> activated.
>
> Signed-off-by: ?lvaro Fern?ndez Rojas <[email protected]>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/generic-ehci.yaml | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/generic-ehci.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/generic-ehci.yaml
> index cf83f2d9afac..294bbf02399e 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/generic-ehci.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/generic-ehci.yaml
> @@ -117,6 +117,11 @@ properties:
> Set this flag if EHCI has a Transaction Translator built into
> the root hub.
>
> + ignore-oc:
> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/flag
> + description:
> + Set this flag for HCDs without over-current reporting support.

This is not a good description of a device property. DT entries are
supposed to described the hardware, not talk about how to use it.

When you say that the bcm63xx doesn't support over-current reporting,
what exactly do you mean? Do you mean that sometimes the hardware turns
on the over-current bit when an over-current isn't actually present? Or
do you mean something else?

Alan Stern

> +
> needs-reset-on-resume:
> $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/flag
> description:
> --
> 2.20.1
>


2021-02-23 20:19:43

by Álvaro Fernández Rojas

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: usb: generic-ehci: document ignore-oc flag

Hi Alan,

> El 23 feb 2021, a las 16:54, Alan Stern <[email protected]> escribió:
>
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 04:50:04PM +0100, Álvaro Fernández Rojas wrote:
>> Over-current reporting isn't supported on some platforms such as bcm63xx.
>> These devices will incorrectly report over-current if this flag isn't properly
>> activated.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Álvaro Fernández Rojas <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/generic-ehci.yaml | 5 +++++
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/generic-ehci.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/generic-ehci.yaml
>> index cf83f2d9afac..294bbf02399e 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/generic-ehci.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/generic-ehci.yaml
>> @@ -117,6 +117,11 @@ properties:
>> Set this flag if EHCI has a Transaction Translator built into
>> the root hub.
>>
>> + ignore-oc:
>> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/flag
>> + description:
>> + Set this flag for HCDs without over-current reporting support.
>
> This is not a good description of a device property. DT entries are
> supposed to described the hardware, not talk about how to use it.

Any suggestions on a proper description?

>
> When you say that the bcm63xx doesn't support over-current reporting,
> what exactly do you mean? Do you mean that sometimes the hardware turns
> on the over-current bit when an over-current isn't actually present? Or
> do you mean something else?

Yes, the hardware turns on the over-current bit with no over-current present.

>
> Alan Stern
>
>> +
>> needs-reset-on-resume:
>> $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/flag
>> description:
>> --
>> 2.20.1

Best regards,
Álvaro.