the target should be unreachable when underlying device was gone.
Signed-off-by: Wenwei Tao <[email protected]>
---
drivers/lightnvm/core.c | 12 ++++++++++--
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/lightnvm/core.c b/drivers/lightnvm/core.c
index f659e60..b95c6c4 100644
--- a/drivers/lightnvm/core.c
+++ b/drivers/lightnvm/core.c
@@ -278,10 +278,18 @@ err:
return ret;
}
+static void nvm_remove_target(struct nvm_target *t);
+
static void nvm_exit(struct nvm_dev *dev)
{
+ struct nvm_target *t, *n;
+
if (dev->ppalist_pool)
dev->ops->destroy_dma_pool(dev->ppalist_pool);
+ down_write(&nvm_lock);
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(t, n, &dev->online_targets, list)
+ nvm_remove_target(t);
+ up_write(&nvm_lock);
nvm_free(dev);
pr_info("nvm: successfully unloaded\n");
@@ -496,13 +504,13 @@ static int __nvm_configure_create(struct nvm_ioctl_create *create)
static int __nvm_configure_remove(struct nvm_ioctl_remove *remove)
{
- struct nvm_target *t = NULL;
+ struct nvm_target *n, *t = NULL;
struct nvm_dev *dev;
int ret = -1;
down_write(&nvm_lock);
list_for_each_entry(dev, &nvm_devices, devices)
- list_for_each_entry(t, &dev->online_targets, list) {
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(t, n, &dev->online_targets, list) {
if (!strcmp(remove->tgtname, t->disk->disk_name)) {
nvm_remove_target(t);
ret = 0;
--
1.9.1
On 11/24/2015 05:03 PM, Wenwei Tao wrote:
> the target should be unreachable when underlying device was gone.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wenwei Tao <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/lightnvm/core.c | 12 ++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/lightnvm/core.c b/drivers/lightnvm/core.c
> index f659e60..b95c6c4 100644
> --- a/drivers/lightnvm/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/lightnvm/core.c
> @@ -278,10 +278,18 @@ err:
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static void nvm_remove_target(struct nvm_target *t);
> +
You can move the hole declaration up here.
> static void nvm_exit(struct nvm_dev *dev)
> {
> + struct nvm_target *t, *n;
> +
> if (dev->ppalist_pool)
> dev->ops->destroy_dma_pool(dev->ppalist_pool);
> + down_write(&nvm_lock);
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(t, n, &dev->online_targets, list)
> + nvm_remove_target(t);
> + up_write(&nvm_lock);
list_for_each_entry_safe should be enough here.
Actually, we should properly block any creations of new targets when
nvm_exit is called. To prevent new ones to be created while we clean up.
Let me know if you want to submit a patch for this. Else I'll just apply
this one with the suggested changes. Thanks Tao.
> nvm_free(dev);
>
> pr_info("nvm: successfully unloaded\n");
> @@ -496,13 +504,13 @@ static int __nvm_configure_create(struct nvm_ioctl_create *create)
>
> static int __nvm_configure_remove(struct nvm_ioctl_remove *remove)
> {
> - struct nvm_target *t = NULL;
> + struct nvm_target *n, *t = NULL;
> struct nvm_dev *dev;
> int ret = -1;
>
> down_write(&nvm_lock);
> list_for_each_entry(dev, &nvm_devices, devices)
> - list_for_each_entry(t, &dev->online_targets, list) {
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(t, n, &dev->online_targets, list) {
> if (!strcmp(remove->tgtname, t->disk->disk_name)) {
> nvm_remove_target(t);
> ret = 0;
>
I will send a patch for that.
2015-11-25 2:51 GMT+08:00 Matias <[email protected]>:
> On 11/24/2015 05:03 PM, Wenwei Tao wrote:
>>
>> the target should be unreachable when underlying device was gone.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wenwei Tao <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> drivers/lightnvm/core.c | 12 ++++++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/lightnvm/core.c b/drivers/lightnvm/core.c
>> index f659e60..b95c6c4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/lightnvm/core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/lightnvm/core.c
>> @@ -278,10 +278,18 @@ err:
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> +static void nvm_remove_target(struct nvm_target *t);
>> +
>
>
> You can move the hole declaration up here.
>
>> static void nvm_exit(struct nvm_dev *dev)
>> {
>> + struct nvm_target *t, *n;
>> +
>> if (dev->ppalist_pool)
>> dev->ops->destroy_dma_pool(dev->ppalist_pool);
>> + down_write(&nvm_lock);
>> + list_for_each_entry_safe(t, n, &dev->online_targets, list)
>> + nvm_remove_target(t);
>> + up_write(&nvm_lock);
>
>
> list_for_each_entry_safe should be enough here.
>
> Actually, we should properly block any creations of new targets when
> nvm_exit is called. To prevent new ones to be created while we clean up.
>
> Let me know if you want to submit a patch for this. Else I'll just apply
> this one with the suggested changes. Thanks Tao.
>
>
>> nvm_free(dev);
>>
>> pr_info("nvm: successfully unloaded\n");
>> @@ -496,13 +504,13 @@ static int __nvm_configure_create(struct
>> nvm_ioctl_create *create)
>>
>> static int __nvm_configure_remove(struct nvm_ioctl_remove *remove)
>> {
>> - struct nvm_target *t = NULL;
>> + struct nvm_target *n, *t = NULL;
>> struct nvm_dev *dev;
>> int ret = -1;
>>
>> down_write(&nvm_lock);
>> list_for_each_entry(dev, &nvm_devices, devices)
>> - list_for_each_entry(t, &dev->online_targets, list) {
>> + list_for_each_entry_safe(t, n, &dev->online_targets, list)
>> {
>> if (!strcmp(remove->tgtname, t->disk->disk_name))
>> {
>> nvm_remove_target(t);
>> ret = 0;
>>
>