2017-08-06 22:38:08

by Christophe JAILLET

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] power: supply: charger-manager: 1 fix and 2 minor clean-ups

This patch series improves 'charger_manager_probe()'. The first patch is
about a missing memory allocation failure test.
The 2 others are just things spotted in this function:
- a comment that is no more up to date
- a style issue (which saves 1 line)

Christophe JAILLET (3):
power: supply: charger-manager: Fix a NULL pointer dereference in
'charger_manager_probe()'
power: supply: charger-manager: Fix a comment
power: supply: charger-manager: Slighly simplify code

drivers/power/supply/charger-manager.c | 9 +++++----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--
2.11.0


2017-08-06 22:38:37

by Christophe JAILLET

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] power: supply: charger-manager: Fix a NULL pointer dereference in 'charger_manager_probe()'

'devm_kzalloc()' can return NULL. Return -ENOMEM in this case in order to
avoid a NULL pointer dereference later on.

Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <[email protected]>
---
drivers/power/supply/charger-manager.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/power/supply/charger-manager.c b/drivers/power/supply/charger-manager.c
index adc3761831e1..52a49857e20f 100644
--- a/drivers/power/supply/charger-manager.c
+++ b/drivers/power/supply/charger-manager.c
@@ -1645,6 +1645,8 @@ static int charger_manager_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
/* Initialize alarm timer */
if (alarmtimer_get_rtcdev()) {
cm_timer = devm_kzalloc(cm->dev, sizeof(*cm_timer), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!cm_timer)
+ return -ENOMEM;
alarm_init(cm_timer, ALARM_BOOTTIME, cm_timer_func);
}

--
2.11.0

2017-08-06 22:38:42

by Christophe JAILLET

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] power: supply: charger-manager: Fix a comment

Update a comment which is no more up to date since commit
2ed9e9b653095.

Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <[email protected]>
---
drivers/power/supply/charger-manager.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/power/supply/charger-manager.c b/drivers/power/supply/charger-manager.c
index 52a49857e20f..83c08c8e2c32 100644
--- a/drivers/power/supply/charger-manager.c
+++ b/drivers/power/supply/charger-manager.c
@@ -1651,8 +1651,8 @@ static int charger_manager_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
}

/*
- * The following two do not need to be errors.
- * Users may intentionally ignore those two features.
+ * Some of the following do not need to be errors.
+ * Users may intentionally ignore those features.
*/
if (desc->fullbatt_uV == 0) {
dev_info(&pdev->dev, "Ignoring full-battery voltage threshold as it is not supplied\n");
--
2.11.0

2017-08-06 22:38:58

by Christophe JAILLET

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] power: supply: charger-manager: Slighly simplify code

Use 'sizeof(*var)' instead of the equivalent 'sizeof(data structure type)'
because it is less verbose.

Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <[email protected]>
---
drivers/power/supply/charger-manager.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/power/supply/charger-manager.c b/drivers/power/supply/charger-manager.c
index 83c08c8e2c32..6502fa7c2106 100644
--- a/drivers/power/supply/charger-manager.c
+++ b/drivers/power/supply/charger-manager.c
@@ -1632,8 +1632,7 @@ static int charger_manager_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return -ENODEV;
}

- cm = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
- sizeof(struct charger_manager), GFP_KERNEL);
+ cm = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*cm), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!cm)
return -ENOMEM;

--
2.11.0

2017-08-06 22:52:18

by Christophe JAILLET

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] scsi: mpt3sas: Fix memory allocation failure test in 'mpt3sas_base_attach()'

In the lines above this test, 8 'kzalloc' are performed, but only 7 results
are tested.

Add the missing one (i.e. '!ioc->port_enable_cmds.reply').

Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <[email protected]>
---
drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_base.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_base.c b/drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_base.c
index 1a5b6e40fb5c..8a44636ab0b5 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_base.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_base.c
@@ -5494,10 +5494,10 @@ mpt3sas_base_attach(struct MPT3SAS_ADAPTER *ioc)
ioc->ctl_cmds.status = MPT3_CMD_NOT_USED;
mutex_init(&ioc->ctl_cmds.mutex);

- if (!ioc->base_cmds.reply || !ioc->transport_cmds.reply ||
- !ioc->scsih_cmds.reply || !ioc->tm_cmds.reply ||
- !ioc->config_cmds.reply || !ioc->ctl_cmds.reply ||
- !ioc->ctl_cmds.sense) {
+ if (!ioc->base_cmds.reply || !ioc->port_enable_cmds.reply ||
+ !ioc->transport_cmds.reply || !ioc->scsih_cmds.reply ||
+ !ioc->tm_cmds.reply || !ioc->config_cmds.reply ||
+ !ioc->ctl_cmds.reply || !ioc->ctl_cmds.sense) {
r = -ENOMEM;
goto out_free_resources;
}
--
2.11.0

2017-08-07 08:25:55

by walter harms

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: mpt3sas: Fix memory allocation failure test in 'mpt3sas_base_attach()'



Am 07.08.2017 00:51, schrieb Christophe JAILLET:
> In the lines above this test, 8 'kzalloc' are performed, but only 7 results
> are tested.
>
> Add the missing one (i.e. '!ioc->port_enable_cmds.reply').
>
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_base.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_base.c b/drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_base.c
> index 1a5b6e40fb5c..8a44636ab0b5 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_base.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_base.c
> @@ -5494,10 +5494,10 @@ mpt3sas_base_attach(struct MPT3SAS_ADAPTER *ioc)
> ioc->ctl_cmds.status = MPT3_CMD_NOT_USED;
> mutex_init(&ioc->ctl_cmds.mutex);
>
> - if (!ioc->base_cmds.reply || !ioc->transport_cmds.reply ||
> - !ioc->scsih_cmds.reply || !ioc->tm_cmds.reply ||
> - !ioc->config_cmds.reply || !ioc->ctl_cmds.reply ||
> - !ioc->ctl_cmds.sense) {
> + if (!ioc->base_cmds.reply || !ioc->port_enable_cmds.reply ||
> + !ioc->transport_cmds.reply || !ioc->scsih_cmds.reply ||
> + !ioc->tm_cmds.reply || !ioc->config_cmds.reply ||
> + !ioc->ctl_cmds.reply || !ioc->ctl_cmds.sense) {
> r = -ENOMEM;
> goto out_free_resources;
> }


obviously it is better to follow the pattern "malloc() , check".
Even the programmer lost track.

Bonus points if you malloc the buffers in one step.

just my 2 cents,

re,
wh


2017-08-07 08:45:41

by Christophe JAILLET

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: mpt3sas: Fix memory allocation failure test in 'mpt3sas_base_attach()'

Le 07/08/2017 à 10:25, walter harms a écrit :
>
> Am 07.08.2017 00:51, schrieb Christophe JAILLET:
>> In the lines above this test, 8 'kzalloc' are performed, but only 7 results
>> are tested.
>>
>> Add the missing one (i.e. '!ioc->port_enable_cmds.reply').
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_base.c | 8 ++++----
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_base.c b/drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_base.c
>> index 1a5b6e40fb5c..8a44636ab0b5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_base.c
>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_base.c
>> @@ -5494,10 +5494,10 @@ mpt3sas_base_attach(struct MPT3SAS_ADAPTER *ioc)
>> ioc->ctl_cmds.status = MPT3_CMD_NOT_USED;
>> mutex_init(&ioc->ctl_cmds.mutex);
>>
>> - if (!ioc->base_cmds.reply || !ioc->transport_cmds.reply ||
>> - !ioc->scsih_cmds.reply || !ioc->tm_cmds.reply ||
>> - !ioc->config_cmds.reply || !ioc->ctl_cmds.reply ||
>> - !ioc->ctl_cmds.sense) {
>> + if (!ioc->base_cmds.reply || !ioc->port_enable_cmds.reply ||
>> + !ioc->transport_cmds.reply || !ioc->scsih_cmds.reply ||
>> + !ioc->tm_cmds.reply || !ioc->config_cmds.reply ||
>> + !ioc->ctl_cmds.reply || !ioc->ctl_cmds.sense) {
>> r = -ENOMEM;
>> goto out_free_resources;
>> }
>
> obviously it is better to follow the pattern "malloc() , check".
Agreed, but it is also more verbose. Leavig it as-is, is IMHO, good enough.

> Even the programmer lost track.
>
> Bonus points if you malloc the buffers in one step.
Most of the allocation are 'kzalloc(ioc->reply_sz, GFP_KERNEL);', so a
kcalloc could be used instead.
However, the 'kzalloc(SCSI_SENSE_BUFFERSIZE, GFP_KERNEL);' breaks this
logic and allocating all at once would lead to spaghetti code for no reason.

Moreover, I don't have any idea how big can be 'ioc->reply_sz', even if
I guess it should be small.
So allocating all at once, could fail where several steps would work.

So I won't play for the bonus points :).

Best regards.
CJ

> just my 2 cents,
>
> re,
> wh
>
>
>

2017-08-12 18:03:45

by Sebastian Reichel

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] power: supply: charger-manager: 1 fix and 2 minor clean-ups

Hi,

On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 12:37:54AM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> This patch series improves 'charger_manager_probe()'. The first patch is
> about a missing memory allocation failure test.
> The 2 others are just things spotted in this function:
> - a comment that is no more up to date
> - a style issue (which saves 1 line)
>
> Christophe JAILLET (3):
> power: supply: charger-manager: Fix a NULL pointer dereference in
> 'charger_manager_probe()'
> power: supply: charger-manager: Fix a comment
> power: supply: charger-manager: Slighly simplify code
>
> drivers/power/supply/charger-manager.c | 9 +++++----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Thanks, queued.

-- Sebastian


Attachments:
(No filename) (721.00 B)
signature.asc (833.00 B)
Download all attachments