hi,
On Thursday 16 November 2017 07:27 PM, Ian Abbott wrote:
> On 16/11/17 04:32, Arvind Yadav wrote:
>> pnp_irq() and pnp_port_start() can fail here and we must check
>> its return value.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/ni_atmio.c | 3 +++
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/ni_atmio.c
>> b/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/ni_atmio.c
>> index 2d62a8c..dead159 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/ni_atmio.c
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/ni_atmio.c
>> @@ -308,6 +308,9 @@ static int ni_atmio_attach(struct comedi_device
>> *dev,
>> iobase = pnp_port_start(isapnp_dev, 0);
>> irq = pnp_irq(isapnp_dev, 0);
>> + if (irq == -1 || !iobase)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> comedi_set_hw_dev(dev, &isapnp_dev->dev);
>> }
>>
>
> Can they fail here? ni_isapnp_find_board() has already checked they
> are valid.
Yes, you are right. It will not fail.
~arvind
From 1584239579366473354@xxx Thu Nov 16 16:09:57 +0000 2017
X-GM-THRID: 1584195855030414163
X-Gmail-Labels: Inbox,Category Forums,HistoricalUnread