2022-11-03 02:11:09

by Hugh Dickins

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] mm,hugetlb: use folio fields in second tail page

We want to declare one more int in the first tail of a compound page:
that first tail page being valuable property, since every compound page
has a first tail, but perhaps no more than that.

No problem on 64-bit: there is already space for it. No problem with
32-bit THPs: 5.18 commit 5232c63f46fd ("mm: Make compound_pincount always
available") kindly cleared the space for it, apparently not realizing
that only 64-bit architectures enable CONFIG_THP_SWAP (whose use of tail
page->private might conflict) - but make sure of that in its Kconfig.

But hugetlb pages use tail page->private of the first tail page for a
subpool pointer, which will conflict; and they also use page->private
of the 2nd, 3rd and 4th tails.

Undo "mm: add private field of first tail to struct page and struct
folio"'s recent addition of private_1 to the folio tail: instead add
hugetlb_subpool, hugetlb_cgroup, hugetlb_cgroup_rsvd, hugetlb_hwpoison
to a second tail page of the folio: THP has long been using several
fields of that tail, so make better use of it for hugetlb too.
This is not how a generic folio should be declared in future,
but it is an effective transitional way to make use of it.

Delete the SUBPAGE_INDEX stuff, but keep __NR_USED_SUBPAGE: now 3.

Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>
---
include/linux/hugetlb.h | 23 +++--------
include/linux/hugetlb_cgroup.h | 31 +++++----------
include/linux/mm_types.h | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------
mm/Kconfig | 2 +-
mm/memory-failure.c | 5 +--
5 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 68 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/hugetlb.h b/include/linux/hugetlb.h
index 65ea34022aa2..03ecf1c5e46f 100644
--- a/include/linux/hugetlb.h
+++ b/include/linux/hugetlb.h
@@ -33,22 +33,9 @@ typedef struct { unsigned long pd; } hugepd_t;
/*
* For HugeTLB page, there are more metadata to save in the struct page. But
* the head struct page cannot meet our needs, so we have to abuse other tail
- * struct page to store the metadata. In order to avoid conflicts caused by
- * subsequent use of more tail struct pages, we gather these discrete indexes
- * of tail struct page here.
+ * struct page to store the metadata.
*/
-enum {
- SUBPAGE_INDEX_SUBPOOL = 1, /* reuse page->private */
-#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_HUGETLB
- SUBPAGE_INDEX_CGROUP, /* reuse page->private */
- SUBPAGE_INDEX_CGROUP_RSVD, /* reuse page->private */
- __MAX_CGROUP_SUBPAGE_INDEX = SUBPAGE_INDEX_CGROUP_RSVD,
-#endif
-#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_FAILURE
- SUBPAGE_INDEX_HWPOISON,
-#endif
- __NR_USED_SUBPAGE,
-};
+#define __NR_USED_SUBPAGE 3

struct hugepage_subpool {
spinlock_t lock;
@@ -722,11 +709,11 @@ extern unsigned int default_hstate_idx;

static inline struct hugepage_subpool *hugetlb_folio_subpool(struct folio *folio)
{
- return (void *)folio_get_private_1(folio);
+ return folio->_hugetlb_subpool;
}

/*
- * hugetlb page subpool pointer located in hpage[1].private
+ * hugetlb page subpool pointer located in hpage[2].hugetlb_subpool
*/
static inline struct hugepage_subpool *hugetlb_page_subpool(struct page *hpage)
{
@@ -736,7 +723,7 @@ static inline struct hugepage_subpool *hugetlb_page_subpool(struct page *hpage)
static inline void hugetlb_set_folio_subpool(struct folio *folio,
struct hugepage_subpool *subpool)
{
- folio_set_private_1(folio, (unsigned long)subpool);
+ folio->_hugetlb_subpool = subpool;
}

static inline void hugetlb_set_page_subpool(struct page *hpage,
diff --git a/include/linux/hugetlb_cgroup.h b/include/linux/hugetlb_cgroup.h
index c70f92fe493e..f706626a8063 100644
--- a/include/linux/hugetlb_cgroup.h
+++ b/include/linux/hugetlb_cgroup.h
@@ -24,12 +24,10 @@ struct file_region;
#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_HUGETLB
/*
* Minimum page order trackable by hugetlb cgroup.
- * At least 4 pages are necessary for all the tracking information.
- * The second tail page (hpage[SUBPAGE_INDEX_CGROUP]) is the fault
- * usage cgroup. The third tail page (hpage[SUBPAGE_INDEX_CGROUP_RSVD])
- * is the reservation usage cgroup.
+ * At least 3 pages are necessary for all the tracking information.
+ * The second tail page contains all of the hugetlb-specific fields.
*/
-#define HUGETLB_CGROUP_MIN_ORDER order_base_2(__MAX_CGROUP_SUBPAGE_INDEX + 1)
+#define HUGETLB_CGROUP_MIN_ORDER order_base_2(__NR_USED_SUBPAGE)

enum hugetlb_memory_event {
HUGETLB_MAX,
@@ -69,21 +67,13 @@ struct hugetlb_cgroup {
static inline struct hugetlb_cgroup *
__hugetlb_cgroup_from_folio(struct folio *folio, bool rsvd)
{
- struct page *tail;
-
VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(!folio_test_hugetlb(folio), folio);
if (folio_order(folio) < HUGETLB_CGROUP_MIN_ORDER)
return NULL;
-
- if (rsvd) {
- tail = folio_page(folio, SUBPAGE_INDEX_CGROUP_RSVD);
- return (void *)page_private(tail);
- }
-
- else {
- tail = folio_page(folio, SUBPAGE_INDEX_CGROUP);
- return (void *)page_private(tail);
- }
+ if (rsvd)
+ return folio->_hugetlb_cgroup_rsvd;
+ else
+ return folio->_hugetlb_cgroup;
}

static inline struct hugetlb_cgroup *hugetlb_cgroup_from_folio(struct folio *folio)
@@ -101,15 +91,12 @@ static inline void __set_hugetlb_cgroup(struct folio *folio,
struct hugetlb_cgroup *h_cg, bool rsvd)
{
VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(!folio_test_hugetlb(folio), folio);
-
if (folio_order(folio) < HUGETLB_CGROUP_MIN_ORDER)
return;
if (rsvd)
- set_page_private(folio_page(folio, SUBPAGE_INDEX_CGROUP_RSVD),
- (unsigned long)h_cg);
+ folio->_hugetlb_cgroup_rsvd = h_cg;
else
- set_page_private(folio_page(folio, SUBPAGE_INDEX_CGROUP),
- (unsigned long)h_cg);
+ folio->_hugetlb_cgroup = h_cg;
}

static inline void set_hugetlb_cgroup(struct folio *folio,
diff --git a/include/linux/mm_types.h b/include/linux/mm_types.h
index 834022721bc6..728eb6089bba 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm_types.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm_types.h
@@ -145,15 +145,22 @@ struct page {
atomic_t compound_pincount;
#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
unsigned int compound_nr; /* 1 << compound_order */
- unsigned long _private_1;
#endif
};
- struct { /* Second tail page of compound page */
+ struct { /* Second tail page of transparent huge page */
unsigned long _compound_pad_1; /* compound_head */
unsigned long _compound_pad_2;
/* For both global and memcg */
struct list_head deferred_list;
};
+ struct { /* Second tail page of hugetlb page */
+ unsigned long _hugetlb_pad_1; /* compound_head */
+ void *hugetlb_subpool;
+ void *hugetlb_cgroup;
+ void *hugetlb_cgroup_rsvd;
+ void *hugetlb_hwpoison;
+ /* No more space on 32-bit: use third tail if more */
+ };
struct { /* Page table pages */
unsigned long _pt_pad_1; /* compound_head */
pgtable_t pmd_huge_pte; /* protected by page->ptl */
@@ -260,13 +267,16 @@ struct page {
* to find how many references there are to this folio.
* @memcg_data: Memory Control Group data.
* @_flags_1: For large folios, additional page flags.
- * @__head: Points to the folio. Do not use.
+ * @_head_1: Points to the folio. Do not use.
* @_folio_dtor: Which destructor to use for this folio.
* @_folio_order: Do not use directly, call folio_order().
* @_total_mapcount: Do not use directly, call folio_entire_mapcount().
* @_pincount: Do not use directly, call folio_maybe_dma_pinned().
* @_folio_nr_pages: Do not use directly, call folio_nr_pages().
- * @_private_1: Do not use directly, call folio_get_private_1().
+ * @_hugetlb_subpool: Do not use directly, use accessor in hugetlb.h.
+ * @_hugetlb_cgroup: Do not use directly, use accessor in hugetlb_cgroup.h.
+ * @_hugetlb_cgroup_rsvd: Do not use directly, use accessor in hugetlb_cgroup.h.
+ * @_hugetlb_hwpoison: Do not use directly, call raw_hwp_list_head().
*
* A folio is a physically, virtually and logically contiguous set
* of bytes. It is a power-of-two in size, and it is aligned to that
@@ -305,16 +315,31 @@ struct folio {
};
struct page page;
};
- unsigned long _flags_1;
- unsigned long __head;
- unsigned char _folio_dtor;
- unsigned char _folio_order;
- atomic_t _total_mapcount;
- atomic_t _pincount;
+ union {
+ struct {
+ unsigned long _flags_1;
+ unsigned long _head_1;
+ unsigned char _folio_dtor;
+ unsigned char _folio_order;
+ atomic_t _total_mapcount;
+ atomic_t _pincount;
#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
- unsigned int _folio_nr_pages;
+ unsigned int _folio_nr_pages;
#endif
- unsigned long _private_1;
+ };
+ struct page page_1;
+ };
+ union {
+ struct {
+ unsigned long _flags_2;
+ unsigned long _head_2;
+ void *_hugetlb_subpool;
+ void *_hugetlb_cgroup;
+ void *_hugetlb_cgroup_rsvd;
+ void *_hugetlb_hwpoison;
+ };
+ struct page page_2;
+ };
};

#define FOLIO_MATCH(pg, fl) \
@@ -335,16 +360,25 @@ FOLIO_MATCH(memcg_data, memcg_data);
static_assert(offsetof(struct folio, fl) == \
offsetof(struct page, pg) + sizeof(struct page))
FOLIO_MATCH(flags, _flags_1);
-FOLIO_MATCH(compound_head, __head);
+FOLIO_MATCH(compound_head, _head_1);
FOLIO_MATCH(compound_dtor, _folio_dtor);
FOLIO_MATCH(compound_order, _folio_order);
FOLIO_MATCH(compound_mapcount, _total_mapcount);
FOLIO_MATCH(compound_pincount, _pincount);
#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
FOLIO_MATCH(compound_nr, _folio_nr_pages);
-FOLIO_MATCH(_private_1, _private_1);
#endif
#undef FOLIO_MATCH
+#define FOLIO_MATCH(pg, fl) \
+ static_assert(offsetof(struct folio, fl) == \
+ offsetof(struct page, pg) + 2 * sizeof(struct page))
+FOLIO_MATCH(flags, _flags_2);
+FOLIO_MATCH(compound_head, _head_2);
+FOLIO_MATCH(hugetlb_subpool, _hugetlb_subpool);
+FOLIO_MATCH(hugetlb_cgroup, _hugetlb_cgroup);
+FOLIO_MATCH(hugetlb_cgroup_rsvd, _hugetlb_cgroup_rsvd);
+FOLIO_MATCH(hugetlb_hwpoison, _hugetlb_hwpoison);
+#undef FOLIO_MATCH

static inline atomic_t *folio_mapcount_ptr(struct folio *folio)
{
@@ -388,16 +422,6 @@ static inline void *folio_get_private(struct folio *folio)
return folio->private;
}

-static inline void folio_set_private_1(struct folio *folio, unsigned long private)
-{
- folio->_private_1 = private;
-}
-
-static inline unsigned long folio_get_private_1(struct folio *folio)
-{
- return folio->_private_1;
-}
-
struct page_frag_cache {
void * va;
#if (PAGE_SIZE < PAGE_FRAG_CACHE_MAX_SIZE)
diff --git a/mm/Kconfig b/mm/Kconfig
index 57e1d8c5b505..bc7e7dacfcd5 100644
--- a/mm/Kconfig
+++ b/mm/Kconfig
@@ -775,7 +775,7 @@ endchoice

config THP_SWAP
def_bool y
- depends on TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE && ARCH_WANTS_THP_SWAP && SWAP
+ depends on TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE && ARCH_WANTS_THP_SWAP && SWAP && 64BIT
help
Swap transparent huge pages in one piece, without splitting.
XXX: For now, swap cluster backing transparent huge page
diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
index 779a426d2cab..63d8501001c6 100644
--- a/mm/memory-failure.c
+++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
@@ -1687,8 +1687,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mf_dax_kill_procs);
#ifdef CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE
/*
* Struct raw_hwp_page represents information about "raw error page",
- * constructing singly linked list originated from ->private field of
- * SUBPAGE_INDEX_HWPOISON-th tail page.
+ * constructing singly linked list from ->_hugetlb_hwpoison field of folio.
*/
struct raw_hwp_page {
struct llist_node node;
@@ -1697,7 +1696,7 @@ struct raw_hwp_page {

static inline struct llist_head *raw_hwp_list_head(struct page *hpage)
{
- return (struct llist_head *)&page_private(hpage + SUBPAGE_INDEX_HWPOISON);
+ return (struct llist_head *)&page_folio(hpage)->_hugetlb_hwpoison;
}

static unsigned long __free_raw_hwp_pages(struct page *hpage, bool move_flag)
--
2.35.3



2022-11-03 21:32:07

by Sidhartha Kumar

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] mm,hugetlb: use folio fields in second tail page


On 11/2/22 6:48 PM, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> We want to declare one more int in the first tail of a compound page:
> that first tail page being valuable property, since every compound page
> has a first tail, but perhaps no more than that.
>
> No problem on 64-bit: there is already space for it. No problem with
> 32-bit THPs: 5.18 commit 5232c63f46fd ("mm: Make compound_pincount always
> available") kindly cleared the space for it, apparently not realizing
> that only 64-bit architectures enable CONFIG_THP_SWAP (whose use of tail
> page->private might conflict) - but make sure of that in its Kconfig.
>
> But hugetlb pages use tail page->private of the first tail page for a
> subpool pointer, which will conflict; and they also use page->private
> of the 2nd, 3rd and 4th tails.
>
> Undo "mm: add private field of first tail to struct page and struct
> folio"'s recent addition of private_1 to the folio tail: instead add
> hugetlb_subpool, hugetlb_cgroup, hugetlb_cgroup_rsvd, hugetlb_hwpoison
> to a second tail page of the folio: THP has long been using several
> fields of that tail, so make better use of it for hugetlb too.
> This is not how a generic folio should be declared in future,
> but it is an effective transitional way to make use of it.
>
> Delete the SUBPAGE_INDEX stuff, but keep __NR_USED_SUBPAGE: now 3.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>
> ---
> include/linux/hugetlb.h | 23 +++--------
> include/linux/hugetlb_cgroup.h | 31 +++++----------
> include/linux/mm_types.h | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> mm/Kconfig | 2 +-
> mm/memory-failure.c | 5 +--
> 5 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 68 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/hugetlb.h b/include/linux/hugetlb.h
> index 65ea34022aa2..03ecf1c5e46f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/hugetlb.h
> +++ b/include/linux/hugetlb.h
> @@ -33,22 +33,9 @@ typedef struct { unsigned long pd; } hugepd_t;
> /*
> * For HugeTLB page, there are more metadata to save in the struct page. But
> * the head struct page cannot meet our needs, so we have to abuse other tail
> - * struct page to store the metadata. In order to avoid conflicts caused by
> - * subsequent use of more tail struct pages, we gather these discrete indexes
> - * of tail struct page here.
> + * struct page to store the metadata.
> */
> -enum {
> - SUBPAGE_INDEX_SUBPOOL = 1, /* reuse page->private */
> -#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_HUGETLB
> - SUBPAGE_INDEX_CGROUP, /* reuse page->private */
> - SUBPAGE_INDEX_CGROUP_RSVD, /* reuse page->private */
> - __MAX_CGROUP_SUBPAGE_INDEX = SUBPAGE_INDEX_CGROUP_RSVD,
> -#endif
> -#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_FAILURE
> - SUBPAGE_INDEX_HWPOISON,
> -#endif
> - __NR_USED_SUBPAGE,
> -};
> +#define __NR_USED_SUBPAGE 3
>
> struct hugepage_subpool {
> spinlock_t lock;
> @@ -722,11 +709,11 @@ extern unsigned int default_hstate_idx;
>
> static inline struct hugepage_subpool *hugetlb_folio_subpool(struct folio *folio)
> {
> - return (void *)folio_get_private_1(folio);
> + return folio->_hugetlb_subpool;
> }
>
> /*
> - * hugetlb page subpool pointer located in hpage[1].private
> + * hugetlb page subpool pointer located in hpage[2].hugetlb_subpool
> */
> static inline struct hugepage_subpool *hugetlb_page_subpool(struct page *hpage)
> {
> @@ -736,7 +723,7 @@ static inline struct hugepage_subpool *hugetlb_page_subpool(struct page *hpage)
> static inline void hugetlb_set_folio_subpool(struct folio *folio,
> struct hugepage_subpool *subpool)
> {
> - folio_set_private_1(folio, (unsigned long)subpool);
> + folio->_hugetlb_subpool = subpool;
> }
>
> static inline void hugetlb_set_page_subpool(struct page *hpage,
> diff --git a/include/linux/hugetlb_cgroup.h b/include/linux/hugetlb_cgroup.h
> index c70f92fe493e..f706626a8063 100644
> --- a/include/linux/hugetlb_cgroup.h
> +++ b/include/linux/hugetlb_cgroup.h
> @@ -24,12 +24,10 @@ struct file_region;
> #ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_HUGETLB
> /*
> * Minimum page order trackable by hugetlb cgroup.
> - * At least 4 pages are necessary for all the tracking information.
> - * The second tail page (hpage[SUBPAGE_INDEX_CGROUP]) is the fault
> - * usage cgroup. The third tail page (hpage[SUBPAGE_INDEX_CGROUP_RSVD])
> - * is the reservation usage cgroup.
> + * At least 3 pages are necessary for all the tracking information.
> + * The second tail page contains all of the hugetlb-specific fields.
> */
> -#define HUGETLB_CGROUP_MIN_ORDER order_base_2(__MAX_CGROUP_SUBPAGE_INDEX + 1)
> +#define HUGETLB_CGROUP_MIN_ORDER order_base_2(__NR_USED_SUBPAGE)
>
> enum hugetlb_memory_event {
> HUGETLB_MAX,
> @@ -69,21 +67,13 @@ struct hugetlb_cgroup {
> static inline struct hugetlb_cgroup *
> __hugetlb_cgroup_from_folio(struct folio *folio, bool rsvd)
> {
> - struct page *tail;
> -
> VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(!folio_test_hugetlb(folio), folio);
> if (folio_order(folio) < HUGETLB_CGROUP_MIN_ORDER)
> return NULL;
> -
> - if (rsvd) {
> - tail = folio_page(folio, SUBPAGE_INDEX_CGROUP_RSVD);
> - return (void *)page_private(tail);
> - }
> -
> - else {
> - tail = folio_page(folio, SUBPAGE_INDEX_CGROUP);
> - return (void *)page_private(tail);
> - }
> + if (rsvd)
> + return folio->_hugetlb_cgroup_rsvd;
> + else
> + return folio->_hugetlb_cgroup;
> }
>
> static inline struct hugetlb_cgroup *hugetlb_cgroup_from_folio(struct folio *folio)
> @@ -101,15 +91,12 @@ static inline void __set_hugetlb_cgroup(struct folio *folio,
> struct hugetlb_cgroup *h_cg, bool rsvd)
> {
> VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(!folio_test_hugetlb(folio), folio);
> -
> if (folio_order(folio) < HUGETLB_CGROUP_MIN_ORDER)
> return;
> if (rsvd)
> - set_page_private(folio_page(folio, SUBPAGE_INDEX_CGROUP_RSVD),
> - (unsigned long)h_cg);
> + folio->_hugetlb_cgroup_rsvd = h_cg;
> else
> - set_page_private(folio_page(folio, SUBPAGE_INDEX_CGROUP),
> - (unsigned long)h_cg);
> + folio->_hugetlb_cgroup = h_cg;
> }
>
> static inline void set_hugetlb_cgroup(struct folio *folio,
> diff --git a/include/linux/mm_types.h b/include/linux/mm_types.h
> index 834022721bc6..728eb6089bba 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mm_types.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm_types.h
> @@ -145,15 +145,22 @@ struct page {
> atomic_t compound_pincount;
> #ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
> unsigned int compound_nr; /* 1 << compound_order */
> - unsigned long _private_1;
> #endif
> };
> - struct { /* Second tail page of compound page */
> + struct { /* Second tail page of transparent huge page */
> unsigned long _compound_pad_1; /* compound_head */
> unsigned long _compound_pad_2;
> /* For both global and memcg */
> struct list_head deferred_list;
> };
> + struct { /* Second tail page of hugetlb page */
> + unsigned long _hugetlb_pad_1; /* compound_head */
> + void *hugetlb_subpool;
> + void *hugetlb_cgroup;
> + void *hugetlb_cgroup_rsvd;
> + void *hugetlb_hwpoison;
> + /* No more space on 32-bit: use third tail if more */
> + };
> struct { /* Page table pages */
> unsigned long _pt_pad_1; /* compound_head */
> pgtable_t pmd_huge_pte; /* protected by page->ptl */
> @@ -260,13 +267,16 @@ struct page {
> * to find how many references there are to this folio.
> * @memcg_data: Memory Control Group data.
> * @_flags_1: For large folios, additional page flags.
> - * @__head: Points to the folio. Do not use.
> + * @_head_1: Points to the folio. Do not use.

Changes to my original patch set look good, this seems to be a cleaner
implementation.

Should the usage of page_1 and page_2 also be documented here?

Thanks,

Sidhartha Kumar

> * @_folio_dtor: Which destructor to use for this folio.
> * @_folio_order: Do not use directly, call folio_order().
> * @_total_mapcount: Do not use directly, call folio_entire_mapcount().
> * @_pincount: Do not use directly, call folio_maybe_dma_pinned().
> * @_folio_nr_pages: Do not use directly, call folio_nr_pages().
> - * @_private_1: Do not use directly, call folio_get_private_1().
> + * @_hugetlb_subpool: Do not use directly, use accessor in hugetlb.h.
> + * @_hugetlb_cgroup: Do not use directly, use accessor in hugetlb_cgroup.h.
> + * @_hugetlb_cgroup_rsvd: Do not use directly, use accessor in hugetlb_cgroup.h.
> + * @_hugetlb_hwpoison: Do not use directly, call raw_hwp_list_head().
> *
> * A folio is a physically, virtually and logically contiguous set
> * of bytes. It is a power-of-two in size, and it is aligned to that
> @@ -305,16 +315,31 @@ struct folio {
> };
> struct page page;
> };
> - unsigned long _flags_1;
> - unsigned long __head;
> - unsigned char _folio_dtor;
> - unsigned char _folio_order;
> - atomic_t _total_mapcount;
> - atomic_t _pincount;
> + union {
> + struct {
> + unsigned long _flags_1;
> + unsigned long _head_1;
> + unsigned char _folio_dtor;
> + unsigned char _folio_order;
> + atomic_t _total_mapcount;
> + atomic_t _pincount;
> #ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
> - unsigned int _folio_nr_pages;
> + unsigned int _folio_nr_pages;
> #endif
> - unsigned long _private_1;
> + };
> + struct page page_1;
> + };
> + union {
> + struct {
> + unsigned long _flags_2;
> + unsigned long _head_2;
> + void *_hugetlb_subpool;
> + void *_hugetlb_cgroup;
> + void *_hugetlb_cgroup_rsvd;
> + void *_hugetlb_hwpoison;
> + };
> + struct page page_2;
> + };
> };
>
> #define FOLIO_MATCH(pg, fl) \
> @@ -335,16 +360,25 @@ FOLIO_MATCH(memcg_data, memcg_data);
> static_assert(offsetof(struct folio, fl) == \
> offsetof(struct page, pg) + sizeof(struct page))
> FOLIO_MATCH(flags, _flags_1);
> -FOLIO_MATCH(compound_head, __head);
> +FOLIO_MATCH(compound_head, _head_1);
> FOLIO_MATCH(compound_dtor, _folio_dtor);
> FOLIO_MATCH(compound_order, _folio_order);
> FOLIO_MATCH(compound_mapcount, _total_mapcount);
> FOLIO_MATCH(compound_pincount, _pincount);
> #ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
> FOLIO_MATCH(compound_nr, _folio_nr_pages);
> -FOLIO_MATCH(_private_1, _private_1);
> #endif
> #undef FOLIO_MATCH
> +#define FOLIO_MATCH(pg, fl) \
> + static_assert(offsetof(struct folio, fl) == \
> + offsetof(struct page, pg) + 2 * sizeof(struct page))
> +FOLIO_MATCH(flags, _flags_2);
> +FOLIO_MATCH(compound_head, _head_2);
> +FOLIO_MATCH(hugetlb_subpool, _hugetlb_subpool);
> +FOLIO_MATCH(hugetlb_cgroup, _hugetlb_cgroup);
> +FOLIO_MATCH(hugetlb_cgroup_rsvd, _hugetlb_cgroup_rsvd);
> +FOLIO_MATCH(hugetlb_hwpoison, _hugetlb_hwpoison);
> +#undef FOLIO_MATCH
>
> static inline atomic_t *folio_mapcount_ptr(struct folio *folio)
> {
> @@ -388,16 +422,6 @@ static inline void *folio_get_private(struct folio *folio)
> return folio->private;
> }
>
> -static inline void folio_set_private_1(struct folio *folio, unsigned long private)
> -{
> - folio->_private_1 = private;
> -}
> -
> -static inline unsigned long folio_get_private_1(struct folio *folio)
> -{
> - return folio->_private_1;
> -}
> -
> struct page_frag_cache {
> void * va;
> #if (PAGE_SIZE < PAGE_FRAG_CACHE_MAX_SIZE)
> diff --git a/mm/Kconfig b/mm/Kconfig
> index 57e1d8c5b505..bc7e7dacfcd5 100644
> --- a/mm/Kconfig
> +++ b/mm/Kconfig
> @@ -775,7 +775,7 @@ endchoice
>
> config THP_SWAP
> def_bool y
> - depends on TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE && ARCH_WANTS_THP_SWAP && SWAP
> + depends on TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE && ARCH_WANTS_THP_SWAP && SWAP && 64BIT
> help
> Swap transparent huge pages in one piece, without splitting.
> XXX: For now, swap cluster backing transparent huge page
> diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
> index 779a426d2cab..63d8501001c6 100644
> --- a/mm/memory-failure.c
> +++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
> @@ -1687,8 +1687,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mf_dax_kill_procs);
> #ifdef CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE
> /*
> * Struct raw_hwp_page represents information about "raw error page",
> - * constructing singly linked list originated from ->private field of
> - * SUBPAGE_INDEX_HWPOISON-th tail page.
> + * constructing singly linked list from ->_hugetlb_hwpoison field of folio.
> */
> struct raw_hwp_page {
> struct llist_node node;
> @@ -1697,7 +1696,7 @@ struct raw_hwp_page {
>
> static inline struct llist_head *raw_hwp_list_head(struct page *hpage)
> {
> - return (struct llist_head *)&page_private(hpage + SUBPAGE_INDEX_HWPOISON);
> + return (struct llist_head *)&page_folio(hpage)->_hugetlb_hwpoison;
> }
>
> static unsigned long __free_raw_hwp_pages(struct page *hpage, bool move_flag)

2022-11-04 04:53:03

by Hugh Dickins

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] mm,hugetlb: use folio fields in second tail page

On Thu, 3 Nov 2022, Sidhartha Kumar wrote:
> On 11/2/22 6:48 PM, Hugh Dickins wrote:
...
> > Undo "mm: add private field of first tail to struct page and struct
> > folio"'s recent addition of private_1 to the folio tail: instead add
> > hugetlb_subpool, hugetlb_cgroup, hugetlb_cgroup_rsvd, hugetlb_hwpoison
> > to a second tail page of the folio: THP has long been using several
> > fields of that tail, so make better use of it for hugetlb too.
> > This is not how a generic folio should be declared in future,
> > but it is an effective transitional way to make use of it.
...
> > @@ -260,13 +267,16 @@ struct page {
> > * to find how many references there are to this folio.
> > * @memcg_data: Memory Control Group data.
> > * @_flags_1: For large folios, additional page flags.
> > - * @__head: Points to the folio. Do not use.
> > + * @_head_1: Points to the folio. Do not use.
>
> Changes to my original patch set look good, this seems to be a cleaner
> implementation.

Thanks a lot, Sidhartha, I'm glad to hear that it works for you too.

I expect that it will be done differently in the future: maybe generalizing
the additional fields to further "private"s as you did, letting different
subsystems accessorize them differently; or removing them completely from
struct folio, letting subsystems declare their own struct folio containers.
I don't know how that will end up, but this for now seems good and clear.

>
> Should the usage of page_1 and page_2 also be documented here?

You must have something interesting in mind to document about them,
but I cannot guess what! They are for field alignment, not for use.
(page_2 to help when/if someone needs to add another pageful.)

Do you mean that I should copy the
/* private: the union with struct page is transitional */
comment from above the original "struct page page;" line I copied?
Or give all three of them a few underscores to imply not for use?

Thanks,
Hugh

2022-11-05 19:32:58

by Kirill A. Shutemov

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] mm,hugetlb: use folio fields in second tail page

On Wed, Nov 02, 2022 at 06:48:45PM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> @@ -260,13 +267,16 @@ struct page {
> * to find how many references there are to this folio.
> * @memcg_data: Memory Control Group data.
> * @_flags_1: For large folios, additional page flags.
> - * @__head: Points to the folio. Do not use.
> + * @_head_1: Points to the folio. Do not use.
> * @_folio_dtor: Which destructor to use for this folio.
> * @_folio_order: Do not use directly, call folio_order().
> * @_total_mapcount: Do not use directly, call folio_entire_mapcount().
> * @_pincount: Do not use directly, call folio_maybe_dma_pinned().
> * @_folio_nr_pages: Do not use directly, call folio_nr_pages().
> - * @_private_1: Do not use directly, call folio_get_private_1().

Looks like it misses

+ * @_flags_2: For large folios, additional page flags.
+ * @_head_2: Points to the folio. Do not use.

to match the first tail page documentation.

Otherwise the patch looks good to me:

Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <[email protected]>


--
Kiryl Shutsemau / Kirill A. Shutemov

2022-11-10 00:33:48

by Sidhartha Kumar

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] mm,hugetlb: use folio fields in second tail page


On 11/3/22 9:29 PM, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Nov 2022, Sidhartha Kumar wrote:
>> On 11/2/22 6:48 PM, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> ...
>>> Undo "mm: add private field of first tail to struct page and struct
>>> folio"'s recent addition of private_1 to the folio tail: instead add
>>> hugetlb_subpool, hugetlb_cgroup, hugetlb_cgroup_rsvd, hugetlb_hwpoison
>>> to a second tail page of the folio: THP has long been using several
>>> fields of that tail, so make better use of it for hugetlb too.
>>> This is not how a generic folio should be declared in future,
>>> but it is an effective transitional way to make use of it.
> ...
>>> @@ -260,13 +267,16 @@ struct page {
>>> * to find how many references there are to this folio.
>>> * @memcg_data: Memory Control Group data.
>>> * @_flags_1: For large folios, additional page flags.
>>> - * @__head: Points to the folio. Do not use.
>>> + * @_head_1: Points to the folio. Do not use.
>> Changes to my original patch set look good, this seems to be a cleaner
>> implementation.
> Thanks a lot, Sidhartha, I'm glad to hear that it works for you too.
>
> I expect that it will be done differently in the future: maybe generalizing
> the additional fields to further "private"s as you did, letting different
> subsystems accessorize them differently; or removing them completely from
> struct folio, letting subsystems declare their own struct folio containers.
> I don't know how that will end up, but this for now seems good and clear.
>
>> Should the usage of page_1 and page_2 also be documented here?
> You must have something interesting in mind to document about them,
> but I cannot guess what! They are for field alignment, not for use.
> (page_2 to help when/if someone needs to add another pageful.)
>
> Do you mean that I should copy the
> /* private: the union with struct page is transitional */
> comment from above the original "struct page page;" line I copied?
> Or give all three of them a few underscores to imply not for use?

I think the underscores with a comment about not for use could be helpful.

Thanks,

Sidhartha Kumar

> Thanks,
> Hugh

2022-11-10 03:15:30

by Hugh Dickins

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] mm,hugetlb: use folio fields in second tail page

On Wed, 9 Nov 2022, Sidhartha Kumar wrote:
> On 11/3/22 9:29 PM, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> >
> >> Should the usage of page_1 and page_2 also be documented here?
> > You must have something interesting in mind to document about them,
> > but I cannot guess what! They are for field alignment, not for use.
> > (page_2 to help when/if someone needs to add another pageful.)
> >
> > Do you mean that I should copy the
> > /* private: the union with struct page is transitional */
> > comment from above the original "struct page page;" line I copied?
> > Or give all three of them a few underscores to imply not for use?
>
> I think the underscores with a comment about not for use could be helpful.

I've given them two underscores (but not to the original "struct page page",
since a build showed that used as "page" elsewhere, not just for alignment).

I'm sorry, but I've not given them any comment: I don't think they
belong in the commented fields section (_flags_1 etc), "page" is not
there; and I'm, let's be honest, terrified of dabbling in this kerneldoc
area - feel very fortunate to have escaped attack by a robot for my
additions so far. I'll leave adding comment to you or other cognoscenti.

Hugh

2022-11-10 03:15:42

by Hugh Dickins

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] mm,hugetlb: use folio fields in second tail page

On Sat, 5 Nov 2022, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 02, 2022 at 06:48:45PM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > @@ -260,13 +267,16 @@ struct page {
> > * to find how many references there are to this folio.
> > * @memcg_data: Memory Control Group data.
> > * @_flags_1: For large folios, additional page flags.
> > - * @__head: Points to the folio. Do not use.
> > + * @_head_1: Points to the folio. Do not use.
> > * @_folio_dtor: Which destructor to use for this folio.
> > * @_folio_order: Do not use directly, call folio_order().
> > * @_total_mapcount: Do not use directly, call folio_entire_mapcount().
> > * @_pincount: Do not use directly, call folio_maybe_dma_pinned().
> > * @_folio_nr_pages: Do not use directly, call folio_nr_pages().
> > - * @_private_1: Do not use directly, call folio_get_private_1().
>
> Looks like it misses
>
> + * @_flags_2: For large folios, additional page flags.
> + * @_head_2: Points to the folio. Do not use.
>
> to match the first tail page documentation.
>
> Otherwise the patch looks good to me:
>
> Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <[email protected]>

Many thanks for all your encouragement and reviews, Kirill.

Okay, I've added a couple of lines on those fields; but did not
want to recommend the _flags_2 field for use (by the time we run
out in _flags_1, I hope all this will be gone or look different).

I'm sending an incremental fix, once I've responded to Sidhartha.

Hugh