2021-04-19 06:47:51

by Liu Shixin

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH -next v3 1/2] mm/debug_vm_pgtable: Move {pmd/pud}_huge_tests out of CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE

From: Shixin Liu <[email protected]>

The functions {pmd/pud}_set_huge and {pmd/pud}_clear_huge are not dependent
on THP. Hence move {pmd/pud}_huge_tests out of CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE.

Signed-off-by: Shixin Liu <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Anshuman Khandual <[email protected]>
---
v2->v3:
Modified the commit message and fix a checkpatch warning.
v1->v2:
Modified the commit message.

mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c | 91 +++++++++++++++++++------------------------
1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c b/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c
index 05efe98a9ac2..d3cf178621d9 100644
--- a/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c
+++ b/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c
@@ -242,29 +242,6 @@ static void __init pmd_leaf_tests(unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot)
WARN_ON(!pmd_leaf(pmd));
}

-#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMAP
-static void __init pmd_huge_tests(pmd_t *pmdp, unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot)
-{
- pmd_t pmd;
-
- if (!arch_vmap_pmd_supported(prot))
- return;
-
- pr_debug("Validating PMD huge\n");
- /*
- * X86 defined pmd_set_huge() verifies that the given
- * PMD is not a populated non-leaf entry.
- */
- WRITE_ONCE(*pmdp, __pmd(0));
- WARN_ON(!pmd_set_huge(pmdp, __pfn_to_phys(pfn), prot));
- WARN_ON(!pmd_clear_huge(pmdp));
- pmd = READ_ONCE(*pmdp);
- WARN_ON(!pmd_none(pmd));
-}
-#else /* CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMAP */
-static void __init pmd_huge_tests(pmd_t *pmdp, unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot) { }
-#endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMAP */
-
static void __init pmd_savedwrite_tests(unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot)
{
pmd_t pmd = pfn_pmd(pfn, prot);
@@ -379,30 +356,6 @@ static void __init pud_leaf_tests(unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot)
pud = pud_mkhuge(pud);
WARN_ON(!pud_leaf(pud));
}
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMAP
-static void __init pud_huge_tests(pud_t *pudp, unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot)
-{
- pud_t pud;
-
- if (!arch_vmap_pud_supported(prot))
- return;
-
- pr_debug("Validating PUD huge\n");
- /*
- * X86 defined pud_set_huge() verifies that the given
- * PUD is not a populated non-leaf entry.
- */
- WRITE_ONCE(*pudp, __pud(0));
- WARN_ON(!pud_set_huge(pudp, __pfn_to_phys(pfn), prot));
- WARN_ON(!pud_clear_huge(pudp));
- pud = READ_ONCE(*pudp);
- WARN_ON(!pud_none(pud));
-}
-#else /* !CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMAP */
-static void __init pud_huge_tests(pud_t *pudp, unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot) { }
-#endif /* !CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMAP */
-
#else /* !CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE_PUD */
static void __init pud_basic_tests(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long pfn, int idx) { }
static void __init pud_advanced_tests(struct mm_struct *mm,
@@ -412,9 +365,6 @@ static void __init pud_advanced_tests(struct mm_struct *mm,
{
}
static void __init pud_leaf_tests(unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot) { }
-static void __init pud_huge_tests(pud_t *pudp, unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot)
-{
-}
#endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE_PUD */
#else /* !CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE */
static void __init pmd_basic_tests(unsigned long pfn, int idx) { }
@@ -433,14 +383,51 @@ static void __init pud_advanced_tests(struct mm_struct *mm,
}
static void __init pmd_leaf_tests(unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot) { }
static void __init pud_leaf_tests(unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot) { }
+static void __init pmd_savedwrite_tests(unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot) { }
+#endif /* CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE */
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMAP
static void __init pmd_huge_tests(pmd_t *pmdp, unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot)
{
+ pmd_t pmd;
+
+ if (!arch_vmap_pmd_supported(prot))
+ return;
+
+ pr_debug("Validating PMD huge\n");
+ /*
+ * X86 defined pmd_set_huge() verifies that the given
+ * PMD is not a populated non-leaf entry.
+ */
+ WRITE_ONCE(*pmdp, __pmd(0));
+ WARN_ON(!pmd_set_huge(pmdp, __pfn_to_phys(pfn), prot));
+ WARN_ON(!pmd_clear_huge(pmdp));
+ pmd = READ_ONCE(*pmdp);
+ WARN_ON(!pmd_none(pmd));
}
+
static void __init pud_huge_tests(pud_t *pudp, unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot)
{
+ pud_t pud;
+
+ if (!arch_vmap_pud_supported(prot))
+ return;
+
+ pr_debug("Validating PUD huge\n");
+ /*
+ * X86 defined pud_set_huge() verifies that the given
+ * PUD is not a populated non-leaf entry.
+ */
+ WRITE_ONCE(*pudp, __pud(0));
+ WARN_ON(!pud_set_huge(pudp, __pfn_to_phys(pfn), prot));
+ WARN_ON(!pud_clear_huge(pudp));
+ pud = READ_ONCE(*pudp);
+ WARN_ON(!pud_none(pud));
}
-static void __init pmd_savedwrite_tests(unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot) { }
-#endif /* CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE */
+#else /* !CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMAP */
+static void __init pmd_huge_tests(pmd_t *pmdp, unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot) { }
+static void __init pud_huge_tests(pud_t *pudp, unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot) { }
+#endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMAP */

static void __init p4d_basic_tests(unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot)
{
--
2.25.1


2021-05-10 04:36:25

by Andrew Morton

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v3 1/2] mm/debug_vm_pgtable: Move {pmd/pud}_huge_tests out of CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE

On Mon, 19 Apr 2021 15:18:19 +0800 Liu Shixin <[email protected]> wrote:

> The functions {pmd/pud}_set_huge and {pmd/pud}_clear_huge are not dependent
> on THP. Hence move {pmd/pud}_huge_tests out of CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE.

What is the actual effect of this? Better test coverage? Smaller
kernel? Larger kernel?

(I'm too lazy to figure this out and it should have been in the
changelog anyway ;))

2021-05-10 07:29:03

by Liu Shixin

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v3 1/2] mm/debug_vm_pgtable: Move {pmd/pud}_huge_tests out of CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE

On 2021/5/10 12:26, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Apr 2021 15:18:19 +0800 Liu Shixin <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> The functions {pmd/pud}_set_huge and {pmd/pud}_clear_huge are not dependent
>> on THP. Hence move {pmd/pud}_huge_tests out of CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE.
> What is the actual effect of this? Better test coverage? Smaller
> kernel? Larger kernel?
>
> (I'm too lazy to figure this out and it should have been in the
> changelog anyway ;))
> .
>
Better test coverage I think.

And I want to add HUGE_VMAP support for riscv, which doesn't have THP support right now.