2020-02-07 20:47:04

by Pavel Begunkov

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] io_uring: add cleanup for openat()

openat() have allocated ->open.filename, which need to be put.
Add cleanup handlers for it.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
---
fs/io_uring.c | 8 +++++++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index b0e6b3bc1aec..42b7861b534c 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -2547,6 +2547,7 @@ static int io_openat_prep(struct io_kiocb *req, const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe)
return ret;
}

+ req->flags |= REQ_F_NEED_CLEANUP;
return 0;
}

@@ -2585,6 +2586,7 @@ static int io_openat2_prep(struct io_kiocb *req, const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe)
return ret;
}

+ req->flags |= REQ_F_NEED_CLEANUP;
return 0;
}

@@ -2616,6 +2618,7 @@ static int io_openat2(struct io_kiocb *req, struct io_kiocb **nxt,
}
err:
putname(req->open.filename);
+ req->flags &= ~REQ_F_NEED_CLEANUP;
if (ret < 0)
req_set_fail_links(req);
io_cqring_add_event(req, ret);
@@ -2857,7 +2860,6 @@ static void io_close_finish(struct io_wq_work **workptr)
}

fput(req->close.put_file);
-
io_put_req_find_next(req, &nxt);
if (nxt)
io_wq_assign_next(workptr, nxt);
@@ -4233,6 +4235,10 @@ static void io_cleanup_req(struct io_kiocb *req)
if (io->msg.iov != io->msg.fast_iov)
kfree(io->msg.iov);
break;
+ case IORING_OP_OPENAT:
+ case IORING_OP_OPENAT2:
+ putname(req->open.filename);
+ break;
}

req->flags &= ~REQ_F_NEED_CLEANUP;
--
2.24.0


2020-02-07 20:54:21

by Jens Axboe

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] io_uring: add cleanup for openat()

On 2/7/20 1:45 PM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> openat() have allocated ->open.filename, which need to be put.
> Add cleanup handlers for it.

Should this include statx too?

--
Jens Axboe

2020-02-07 20:58:14

by Pavel Begunkov

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] io_uring: add cleanup for openat()

On 07/02/2020 23:53, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 2/7/20 1:45 PM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>> openat() have allocated ->open.filename, which need to be put.
>> Add cleanup handlers for it.
>
> Should this include statx too?

It should. Missed, that statx uses the same struct.
I'll resend.

--
Pavel Begunkov


Attachments:
signature.asc (849.00 B)
OpenPGP digital signature