Hi Ben,
Thanks for the patch.
On 18/12/19 11:07, Ben Dooks (Codethink) wrote:
> The init_lock is not declared or used outside of cros_ec_ishtp.c
> so make it static to avoid the following warning:
>
> drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_ishtp.c:79:1: warning: symbol 'init_lock' was not declared. Should it be static?
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks (Codethink) <[email protected]>
Applied for 5.6
> ---
> Cc: Benson Leung <[email protected]>
> Cc: Enric Balletbo i Serra <[email protected]>
> Cc: Guenter Roeck <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> ---
> drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_ishtp.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_ishtp.c b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_ishtp.c
> index e5996821d08b..5f8e76f3022a 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_ishtp.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_ishtp.c
> @@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ struct cros_ish_in_msg {
> *
> * The writers are .reset() and .probe() function.
> */
> -DECLARE_RWSEM(init_lock);
> +static DECLARE_RWSEM(init_lock);
>
> /**
> * struct response_info - Encapsulate firmware response related
>