2015-11-21 08:26:36

by Paul Davies C

Subject: [PATCH] staging: lustre: lov: Fix sparse warning

This patch fixes the following warnings:-

drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_object.c:926:22: warning: symbol 'lov_lsm_get' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_object.c:942:6: warning: symbol 'lov_lsm_put' was not declared. Should it be static?

Signed-off-by: Paul Davies C <[email protected]>
---
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_object.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_object.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_object.c
index c7ff817..a667336 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_object.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_object.c
@@ -923,7 +923,7 @@ static struct lov_stripe_md *lov_lsm_addref(struct lov_object *lov)
return lsm;
}

-struct lov_stripe_md *lov_lsm_get(struct cl_object *clobj)
+static struct lov_stripe_md *lov_lsm_get(struct cl_object *clobj)
{
struct lu_object *luobj;
struct lov_stripe_md *lsm = NULL;
@@ -939,7 +939,7 @@ struct lov_stripe_md *lov_lsm_get(struct cl_object *clobj)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(lov_lsm_get);

-void lov_lsm_put(struct cl_object *unused, struct lov_stripe_md *lsm)
+static void lov_lsm_put(struct cl_object *unused, struct lov_stripe_md *lsm)
{
if (lsm != NULL)
lov_free_memmd(&lsm);
--
1.9.1

2015-11-21 15:09:26

by Oleg Drokin

Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: lustre: lov: Fix sparse warning

Hello!

On Nov 21, 2015, at 3:26 AM, Paul Davies C wrote:

> This patch fixes the following warnings:-
>
> drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_object.c:926:22: warning: symbol 'lov_lsm_get' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_object.c:942:6: warning: symbol 'lov_lsm_put' was not declared. Should it be static?
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Davies C <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_object.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_object.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_object.c
> index c7ff817..a667336 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_object.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_object.c
> @@ -923,7 +923,7 @@ static struct lov_stripe_md *lov_lsm_addref(struct lov_object *lov)
> return lsm;
> }
>
> -struct lov_stripe_md *lov_lsm_get(struct cl_object *clobj)
> +static struct lov_stripe_md *lov_lsm_get(struct cl_object *clobj)
> {
> struct lu_object *luobj;
> struct lov_stripe_md *lsm = NULL;
> @@ -939,7 +939,7 @@ struct lov_stripe_md *lov_lsm_get(struct cl_object *clobj)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(lov_lsm_get);

You did not compile-tested this, did you?
This symbol is still used in lustre/lclient/lcommon_cl.c but also
leaving EXPORT_SYMBOL intact for a static symbol?

>
> -void lov_lsm_put(struct cl_object *unused, struct lov_stripe_md *lsm)
> +static void lov_lsm_put(struct cl_object *unused, struct lov_stripe_md *lsm)
> {
> if (lsm != NULL)
> lov_free_memmd(&lsm);
> --
> 1.9.1
>