Since the CONFIG_CTL register is only 32 bits wide in the Stromer
and Stromer Plus PLLs , the 'config_ctl_hi_val' values from the
IPQ5018 and IPQ5332 configurations are not used so remove those.
No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Gabor Juhos <[email protected]>
---
Based on 'qcom-clk-for-6.10'
---
drivers/clk/qcom/apss-ipq-pll.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/apss-ipq-pll.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/apss-ipq-pll.c
index 5f7f537e4ecb..e8632db2c542 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/qcom/apss-ipq-pll.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/apss-ipq-pll.c
@@ -70,7 +70,6 @@ static struct clk_alpha_pll ipq_pll_stromer_plus = {
static const struct alpha_pll_config ipq5018_pll_config = {
.l = 0x2a,
.config_ctl_val = 0x4001075b,
- .config_ctl_hi_val = 0x304,
.main_output_mask = BIT(0),
.aux_output_mask = BIT(1),
.early_output_mask = BIT(3),
@@ -84,7 +83,6 @@ static const struct alpha_pll_config ipq5018_pll_config = {
static const struct alpha_pll_config ipq5332_pll_config = {
.l = 0x2d,
.config_ctl_val = 0x4001075b,
- .config_ctl_hi_val = 0x304,
.main_output_mask = BIT(0),
.aux_output_mask = BIT(1),
.early_output_mask = BIT(3),
---
base-commit: 3c5b3e17b8fd1f1add5a9477306c355fab126977
change-id: 20240509-stromer-config-ctl-8cee8e857e13
Best regards,
--
Gabor Juhos <[email protected]>
On 9.05.2024 10:08 AM, Gabor Juhos wrote:
> Since the CONFIG_CTL register is only 32 bits wide in the Stromer
> and Stromer Plus PLLs , the 'config_ctl_hi_val' values from the
> IPQ5018 and IPQ5332 configurations are not used so remove those.
>
> No functional changes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gabor Juhos <[email protected]>
> ---
Hm, it sounds suspicious that we'd have these settings then.. Could somebody from
QC please confirm that everything's alright here?
Konrad
On 5/10/2024 12:23 AM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 9.05.2024 10:08 AM, Gabor Juhos wrote:
>> Since the CONFIG_CTL register is only 32 bits wide in the Stromer
>> and Stromer Plus PLLs , the 'config_ctl_hi_val' values from the
>> IPQ5018 and IPQ5332 configurations are not used so remove those.
>>
>> No functional changes.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gabor Juhos <[email protected]>
>> ---
>
> Hm, it sounds suspicious that we'd have these settings then.. Could somebody from
> QC please confirm that everything's alright here?
I checked the HW doc and yes in both IPQ5018 and IPQ5332 CONFIG_CTL_U
register is not implemented. I see offset of CONFIG_CTL_U register is
removed in the change[1] by Gabor.
Given that, should we also drop the pll_has_64bit_config() if block from
clk_stromer_pll_configure function?
Nevertheless, for this patch
Reviewed-by: Kathiravan Thirumoorthy <[email protected]>
[1]
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=4f2bc4acbb19
>
> Konrad
On 10.05.2024 6:25 PM, Kathiravan Thirumoorthy wrote:
>
>
> On 5/10/2024 12:23 AM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> On 9.05.2024 10:08 AM, Gabor Juhos wrote:
>>> Since the CONFIG_CTL register is only 32 bits wide in the Stromer
>>> and Stromer Plus PLLs , the 'config_ctl_hi_val' values from the
>>> IPQ5018 and IPQ5332 configurations are not used so remove those.
>>>
>>> No functional changes.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Gabor Juhos <[email protected]>
>>> ---
>>
>> Hm, it sounds suspicious that we'd have these settings then.. Could somebody from
>> QC please confirm that everything's alright here?
>
>
> I checked the HW doc and yes in both IPQ5018 and IPQ5332 CONFIG_CTL_U register is not implemented. I see offset of CONFIG_CTL_U register is removed in the change[1] by Gabor.
Thanks
Acked-by: Konrad Dybcio <[email protected]>
Konrad
2024. 05. 10. 18:25 keltezéssel, Kathiravan Thirumoorthy írta:
>
>
> On 5/10/2024 12:23 AM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> On 9.05.2024 10:08 AM, Gabor Juhos wrote:
>>> Since the CONFIG_CTL register is only 32 bits wide in the Stromer
>>> and Stromer Plus PLLs , the 'config_ctl_hi_val' values from the
>>> IPQ5018 and IPQ5332 configurations are not used so remove those.
>>>
>>> No functional changes.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Gabor Juhos <[email protected]>
>>> ---
>>
>> Hm, it sounds suspicious that we'd have these settings then.. Could somebody from
>> QC please confirm that everything's alright here?
>
>
> I checked the HW doc and yes in both IPQ5018 and IPQ5332 CONFIG_CTL_U register
> is not implemented. I see offset of CONFIG_CTL_U register is removed in the
> change[1] by Gabor.
Thanks for confirming!
>
> Given that, should we also drop the pll_has_64bit_config() if block from
> clk_stromer_pll_configure function?
If we can be sure, that there will be no Stromer PLLs which implements that
register we can drop the check. Also, since the SUPPORTS_FSM_MODE flag is not
set for any of the Stromer (Plus) Plls supported currently, the related check
can be dropped as well.
However I would keep that as is for now. I'm planning to remove the
clk_stromer_pll_configure() function entirely but that needs a bunch of
preparatory patches which I'm working on at the moment.
>
> Nevertheless, for this patch
>
> Reviewed-by: Kathiravan Thirumoorthy <[email protected]>
Thank you!
Regards,
Gabor
On 5/14/2024 12:14 AM, Gabor Juhos wrote:
> 2024. 05. 10. 18:25 keltezéssel, Kathiravan Thirumoorthy írta:
>>
>>
>> On 5/10/2024 12:23 AM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>> On 9.05.2024 10:08 AM, Gabor Juhos wrote:
>>>> Since the CONFIG_CTL register is only 32 bits wide in the Stromer
>>>> and Stromer Plus PLLs , the 'config_ctl_hi_val' values from the
>>>> IPQ5018 and IPQ5332 configurations are not used so remove those.
>>>>
>>>> No functional changes.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Gabor Juhos <[email protected]>
>>>> ---
>>>
>>> Hm, it sounds suspicious that we'd have these settings then.. Could somebody from
>>> QC please confirm that everything's alright here?
>>
>>
>> I checked the HW doc and yes in both IPQ5018 and IPQ5332 CONFIG_CTL_U register
>> is not implemented. I see offset of CONFIG_CTL_U register is removed in the
>> change[1] by Gabor.
>
> Thanks for confirming!
>
>>
>> Given that, should we also drop the pll_has_64bit_config() if block from
>> clk_stromer_pll_configure function?
>
> If we can be sure, that there will be no Stromer PLLs which implements that
> register we can drop the check. Also, since the SUPPORTS_FSM_MODE flag is not
> set for any of the Stromer (Plus) Plls supported currently, the related check
> can be dropped as well.
>
> However I would keep that as is for now. I'm planning to remove the
> clk_stromer_pll_configure() function entirely but that needs a bunch of
> preparatory patches which I'm working on at the moment.
>
It was Stephen's suggestion[1] to introduce the
clk_stromer_pll_configure() to avoid touching the
clk_alpha_pll_configure() which has been used by many PLLs. However if
we have a valid points to remove this API, then yes.
[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/[email protected]/
>>
>> Nevertheless, for this patch
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Kathiravan Thirumoorthy <[email protected]>
>
> Thank you!
>
> Regards,
> Gabor
On Thu, 09 May 2024 10:08:04 +0200, Gabor Juhos wrote:
> Since the CONFIG_CTL register is only 32 bits wide in the Stromer
> and Stromer Plus PLLs , the 'config_ctl_hi_val' values from the
> IPQ5018 and IPQ5332 configurations are not used so remove those.
>
> No functional changes.
>
>
> [...]
Applied, thanks!
[1/1] clk: qcom: apss-ipq-pll: remove 'config_ctl_hi_val' from Stromer pll configs
commit: 2ba8425678af422da37b6c9b50e9ce66f0f55cae
Best regards,
--
Bjorn Andersson <[email protected]>