wdm_in_callback() is a completion handler function for the USB driver.
So it should not sleep. But it calls service_outstanding_interrupt(),
which calls usb_submit_urb() with GFP_KERNEL.
To fix this bug, GFP_KERNEL is replaced with GFP_ATOMIC.
This bug is found by my static analysis tool DSAC.
Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <[email protected]>
---
v2:
* Add more description.
---
drivers/usb/class/cdc-wdm.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/class/cdc-wdm.c b/drivers/usb/class/cdc-wdm.c
index a0d284ef3f40..632a2bfabc08 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/class/cdc-wdm.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/class/cdc-wdm.c
@@ -458,7 +458,7 @@ static int service_outstanding_interrupt(struct wdm_device *desc)
set_bit(WDM_RESPONDING, &desc->flags);
spin_unlock_irq(&desc->iuspin);
- rv = usb_submit_urb(desc->response, GFP_KERNEL);
+ rv = usb_submit_urb(desc->response, GFP_ATOMIC);
spin_lock_irq(&desc->iuspin);
if (rv) {
dev_err(&desc->intf->dev,
--
2.17.0
On 2018-09-01 16:12:10 [+0800], Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
> wdm_in_callback() is a completion handler function for the USB driver.
> So it should not sleep. But it calls service_outstanding_interrupt(),
> which calls usb_submit_urb() with GFP_KERNEL.
At which point does wdm_in_callback() invoke
service_outstanding_interrupt()? I don't see it. I see one invocation
from wdm_read() and another from service_interrupt_work().
Also, if that would be the case, then spin_unlock_irq() in an USB
completion handler (which might run in IRQ context with interrupts
disabled) would be wrong.
> To fix this bug, GFP_KERNEL is replaced with GFP_ATOMIC.
>
> This bug is found by my static analysis tool DSAC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <[email protected]>
> ---
> v2:
> * Add more description.
> ---
> drivers/usb/class/cdc-wdm.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/class/cdc-wdm.c b/drivers/usb/class/cdc-wdm.c
> index a0d284ef3f40..632a2bfabc08 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/class/cdc-wdm.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/class/cdc-wdm.c
> @@ -458,7 +458,7 @@ static int service_outstanding_interrupt(struct wdm_device *desc)
>
> set_bit(WDM_RESPONDING, &desc->flags);
> spin_unlock_irq(&desc->iuspin);
> - rv = usb_submit_urb(desc->response, GFP_KERNEL);
> + rv = usb_submit_urb(desc->response, GFP_ATOMIC);
> spin_lock_irq(&desc->iuspin);
> if (rv) {
> dev_err(&desc->intf->dev,
Sebastian
This reverts commit 6e22e3af7bb3a7b9dc53cb4687659f6e63fca427.
The bug the patch describes to, has been already fixed in commit
2df6948428542 ("USB: cdc-wdm: don't enable interrupts in USB-giveback")
so need to this, revert it.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <[email protected]>
---
drivers/usb/class/cdc-wdm.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/class/cdc-wdm.c b/drivers/usb/class/cdc-wdm.c
index 656d247819c9d..bec581fb7c636 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/class/cdc-wdm.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/class/cdc-wdm.c
@@ -460,7 +460,7 @@ static int service_outstanding_interrupt(struct wdm_device *desc)
set_bit(WDM_RESPONDING, &desc->flags);
spin_unlock_irq(&desc->iuspin);
- rv = usb_submit_urb(desc->response, GFP_ATOMIC);
+ rv = usb_submit_urb(desc->response, GFP_KERNEL);
spin_lock_irq(&desc->iuspin);
if (rv) {
dev_err(&desc->intf->dev,
--
2.19.0.rc2
On 2018/9/11 15:49, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2018-09-01 16:12:10 [+0800], Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
>> wdm_in_callback() is a completion handler function for the USB driver.
>> So it should not sleep. But it calls service_outstanding_interrupt(),
>> which calls usb_submit_urb() with GFP_KERNEL.
> At which point does wdm_in_callback() invoke
> service_outstanding_interrupt()? I don't see it. I see one invocation
> from wdm_read() and another from service_interrupt_work().
>
> Also, if that would be the case, then spin_unlock_irq() in an USB
> completion handler (which might run in IRQ context with interrupts
> disabled) would be wrong.
Yes, you are right.
I checked an old kernel version Linux-4.16 and got this report.
The current code looks much different from the code that I checked.
Sorry for my false report, and thanks for your correction.
Best wishes,
Jia-Ju Bai