On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 02:51:25PM +0100, Nicolai Stange wrote:
> The changes from v3 to v4 are style changes regarding the Coccinelle
> part only -- it has been split off from former [3/7] into its own
> patch [4/8].
>
> The big step has been from v2 to v3 and these changes haven't got any
> review yet.
Well, given that they look sane to me, I've applied them to my tree,
let's see what breaks in linux-next now :)
thanks,
greg k-h
Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> writes:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 02:51:25PM +0100, Nicolai Stange wrote:
>> The changes from v3 to v4 are style changes regarding the Coccinelle
>> part only -- it has been split off from former [3/7] into its own
>> patch [4/8].
>>
>> The big step has been from v2 to v3 and these changes haven't got any
>> review yet.
>
> Well, given that they look sane to me, I've applied them to my tree,
> let's see what breaks in linux-next now :)
Great, thank you!
Unfortunately, the kbuild test robot detected two minor issues and I've
sent v5 in order to correct this.
In case that it isn't possible to simply replace v4 by v5, please let me
know and I'll send two fixup patches instead.
Best,
Nicolai
On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 01:54:40PM +0100, Nicolai Stange wrote:
> Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> writes:
>
> > On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 02:51:25PM +0100, Nicolai Stange wrote:
> >> The changes from v3 to v4 are style changes regarding the Coccinelle
> >> part only -- it has been split off from former [3/7] into its own
> >> patch [4/8].
> >>
> >> The big step has been from v2 to v3 and these changes haven't got any
> >> review yet.
> >
> > Well, given that they look sane to me, I've applied them to my tree,
> > let's see what breaks in linux-next now :)
>
> Great, thank you!
>
> Unfortunately, the kbuild test robot detected two minor issues and I've
> sent v5 in order to correct this.
>
> In case that it isn't possible to simply replace v4 by v5, please let me
> know and I'll send two fixup patches instead.
What do the fixup patches look like? That might be easier to take if
they aren't really major issues (one was a documentation issue, which
isn't a big deal...)
thanks,
greg k-h
Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> writes:
> On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 01:54:40PM +0100, Nicolai Stange wrote:
>> Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> writes:
>>
>> > On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 02:51:25PM +0100, Nicolai Stange wrote:
>> >> The changes from v3 to v4 are style changes regarding the Coccinelle
>> >> part only -- it has been split off from former [3/7] into its own
>> >> patch [4/8].
>> >>
>> >> The big step has been from v2 to v3 and these changes haven't got any
>> >> review yet.
>> >
>> > Well, given that they look sane to me, I've applied them to my tree,
>> > let's see what breaks in linux-next now :)
>>
>> Great, thank you!
>>
>> Unfortunately, the kbuild test robot detected two minor issues and I've
>> sent v5 in order to correct this.
>>
>> In case that it isn't possible to simply replace v4 by v5, please let me
>> know and I'll send two fixup patches instead.
>
> What do the fixup patches look like? That might be easier to take if
> they aren't really major issues (one was a documentation issue, which
> isn't a big deal...)
I sent the two fixup patches as a proposal in a series of their own:
http://lkml.kernel.org/g/[email protected]
Thank you!
Nicolai