This one place forgot to check the fixed capability.
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/mtrr.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/mtrr.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/mtrr.c
index 767bf1c71aad..2a2fc14955cd 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/mtrr.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/mtrr.c
@@ -609,7 +609,7 @@ void mtrr_save_state(void)
{
int first_cpu;
- if (!mtrr_enabled())
+ if (!mtrr_enabled() || !mtrr_state.have_fixed)
return;
first_cpu = cpumask_first(cpu_online_mask);
--
2.43.0
On Fri, Jan 05 2024 at 08:37, Andi Kleen wrote:
> This one place forgot to check the fixed capability.
What's the consequence of that missing check and shouldn't this have a
Fixes tag?
Thanks,
tglx
On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 08:06:26PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 05 2024 at 08:37, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > This one place forgot to check the fixed capability.
>
> What's the consequence of that missing chec
You get a WARN_ON for a WRMSR failing if you don't have the MSR.
> and shouldn't this have a Fixes tag?
It's more an ancient bug back dating back to my tenure in 2007, but here it is:
Fixes: 2b1f6278d77c ("[PATCH] x86: Save the MTRRs of the BSP before")
-Andi
On Tue, Jan 09 2024 at 20:24, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 08:06:26PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 05 2024 at 08:37, Andi Kleen wrote:
>> > This one place forgot to check the fixed capability.
>>
>> What's the consequence of that missing chec
>
> You get a WARN_ON for a WRMSR failing if you don't have the MSR.
>
>> and shouldn't this have a Fixes tag?
>
> It's more an ancient bug back dating back to my tenure in 2007, but here it is:
>
> Fixes: 2b1f6278d77c ("[PATCH] x86: Save the MTRRs of the BSP before")
Care to send a V2 with a less meager changelog?