The powerpc ppc6xx_defconfig builds failed on today's Linux next tag
next-20240304.
Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <[email protected]>
Build log:
---------
drivers/video/fbdev/chipsfb.c: In function 'chipsfb_pci_init':
drivers/video/fbdev/chipsfb.c:401:31: error: invalid use of undefined
type 'struct backlight_device'
401 | pmac_backlight->props.power = FB_BLANK_UNBLANK;
| ^~
Steps to reproduce:
# tuxmake --runtime podman --target-arch powerpc --toolchain gcc-13
--kconfig ppc6xx_defconfig
- https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/2dDE297yLFrAr3gigIDy8tIleDh/tuxmake_reproducer.sh
Links:
- https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-next-master/build/next-20240304/testrun/22919857/suite/build/test/gcc-13-ppc6xx_defconfig/details/
- https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-next-master/build/next-20240304/testrun/22919857/suite/build/test/gcc-13-ppc6xx_defconfig/log
- https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-next-master/build/next-20240304/testrun/22919857/suite/build/test/gcc-13-ppc6xx_defconfig/history/
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
Removal of the backlight include from fb.h uncovered an implicit
dependency in powerpc asm/backlight.h. Add the explicit include.
Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju <[email protected]>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/CA+G9fYsAk5TbqqxFC2W4oHLGA0CbTHMxbeq8QayFXTU75YiueA@mail.gmail.com
Fixes: 11b4eedfc87d ("fbdev: Do not include <linux/backlight.h> in header")
Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <[email protected]>
Cc: Helge Deller <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <[email protected]>
---
Not even compile tested!
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/backlight.h | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/backlight.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/backlight.h
index 1b5eab62ed04..275d5bb9aa04 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/backlight.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/backlight.h
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
#define __ASM_POWERPC_BACKLIGHT_H
#ifdef __KERNEL__
+#include <linux/backlight.h>
#include <linux/fb.h>
#include <linux/mutex.h>
--
2.39.2
On Mon, 04 Mar 2024, Jani Nikula <[email protected]> wrote:
> Removal of the backlight include from fb.h uncovered an implicit
> dependency in powerpc asm/backlight.h. Add the explicit include.
>
> Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju <[email protected]>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/CA+G9fYsAk5TbqqxFC2W4oHLGA0CbTHMxbeq8QayFXTU75YiueA@mail.gmail.com
> Fixes: 11b4eedfc87d ("fbdev: Do not include <linux/backlight.h> in header")
> Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <[email protected]>
> Cc: Helge Deller <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <[email protected]>
>
> ---
>
> Not even compile tested!
Naresh, please try this patch!
Michael, if this is fine by you, ack to merge via the drm subsystem
along with the regressing commit?
BR,
Jani.
> ---
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/backlight.h | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/backlight.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/backlight.h
> index 1b5eab62ed04..275d5bb9aa04 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/backlight.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/backlight.h
> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
> #define __ASM_POWERPC_BACKLIGHT_H
> #ifdef __KERNEL__
>
> +#include <linux/backlight.h>
> #include <linux/fb.h>
> #include <linux/mutex.h>
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
Am 04.03.24 um 11:32 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann:
[...]
>> ---
>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/backlight.h | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/backlight.h
>> b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/backlight.h
>> index 1b5eab62ed04..275d5bb9aa04 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/backlight.h
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/backlight.h
>> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
>> #define __ASM_POWERPC_BACKLIGHT_H
>> #ifdef __KERNEL__
>> +#include <linux/backlight.h>
>
> Thanks, but I think this should go directly into chipsfb.c. I would
> have provided a patch already, if our mail server didn't have issues
> this morning. Let me try again.
Posted at
https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/[email protected]/T/#u
>
> Best regards
> Thomas
>
>> #include <linux/fb.h>
>> #include <linux/mutex.h>
>
--
--
Thomas Zimmermann
Graphics Driver Developer
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
Frankenstrasse 146, 90461 Nuernberg, Germany
GF: Ivo Totev, Andrew Myers, Andrew McDonald, Boudien Moerman
HRB 36809 (AG Nuernberg)
Hi
Am 04.03.24 um 10:55 schrieb Jani Nikula:
> Removal of the backlight include from fb.h uncovered an implicit
> dependency in powerpc asm/backlight.h. Add the explicit include.
>
> Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju <[email protected]>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/CA+G9fYsAk5TbqqxFC2W4oHLGA0CbTHMxbeq8QayFXTU75YiueA@mail.gmail.com
> Fixes: 11b4eedfc87d ("fbdev: Do not include <linux/backlight.h> in header")
> Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <[email protected]>
> Cc: Helge Deller <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <[email protected]>
>
> ---
>
> Not even compile tested!
That's one of the cases that's hard to catch unless you get the config
right.
> ---
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/backlight.h | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/backlight.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/backlight.h
> index 1b5eab62ed04..275d5bb9aa04 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/backlight.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/backlight.h
> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
> #define __ASM_POWERPC_BACKLIGHT_H
> #ifdef __KERNEL__
>
> +#include <linux/backlight.h>
Thanks, but I think this should go directly into chipsfb.c. I would have
provided a patch already, if our mail server didn't have issues this
morning. Let me try again.
Best regards
Thomas
> #include <linux/fb.h>
> #include <linux/mutex.h>
>
--
--
Thomas Zimmermann
Graphics Driver Developer
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
Frankenstrasse 146, 90461 Nuernberg, Germany
GF: Ivo Totev, Andrew Myers, Andrew McDonald, Boudien Moerman
HRB 36809 (AG Nuernberg)
Hi Jani and Benjamin,
On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 at 15:31, Jani Nikula <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 04 Mar 2024, Jani Nikula <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Removal of the backlight include from fb.h uncovered an implicit
> > dependency in powerpc asm/backlight.h. Add the explicit include.
> >
> > Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju <[email protected]>
> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/CA+G9fYsAk5TbqqxFC2W4oHLGA0CbTHMxbeq8QayFXTU75YiueA@mail.gmail.com
> > Fixes: 11b4eedfc87d ("fbdev: Do not include <linux/backlight.h> in header")
> > Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Helge Deller <[email protected]>
> > Cc: [email protected]
> > Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <[email protected]>
> >
> > ---
> >
> > Not even compile tested!
>
> Naresh, please try this patch!
Thanks for the proposed fix patch.
Steps to reproduce:
# tuxmake --runtime podman --target-arch powerpc --toolchain gcc-13
--kconfig ppc6xx_defconfig --kconfig-add CONFIG_PMAC_BACKLIGHT=y
config debugkernel dtbs kernel modules xipkernel
# Applying patch set
Applying: fbdev/chipsfb: Include <linux/backlight.h>
The reported build regression is fixed but build failed with below errors.
My two cents,
I should have copied the full build error log in the morning.
Few more build errors on powerpc builds,
------------------
drivers/macintosh/via-pmu-backlight.c: In function
'__pmu_backlight_update_status':
drivers/macintosh/via-pmu-backlight.c:74:21: error: implicit
declaration of function 'backlight_get_brightness'; did you mean
'pmu_backlight_get_level_brightness'?
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
74 | int level = backlight_get_brightness(bd);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| pmu_backlight_get_level_brightness
drivers/macintosh/via-pmu-backlight.c: At top level:
drivers/macintosh/via-pmu-backlight.c:108:21: error: variable
'pmu_backlight_data' has initializer but incomplete type
108 | static const struct backlight_ops pmu_backlight_data = {
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/macintosh/via-pmu-backlight.c:109:10: error: 'const struct
backlight_ops' has no member named 'update_status'
109 | .update_status = pmu_backlight_update_status,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/macintosh/via-pmu-backlight.c:109:27: warning: excess elements
in struct initializer
109 | .update_status = pmu_backlight_update_status,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/macintosh/via-pmu-backlight.c:109:27: note: (near
initialization for 'pmu_backlight_data')
drivers/macintosh/via-pmu-backlight.c: In function 'pmu_backlight_init':
drivers/macintosh/via-pmu-backlight.c:136:37: error: storage size of
'props' isn't known
136 | struct backlight_properties props;
| ^~~~~
drivers/macintosh/via-pmu-backlight.c:154:34: error: invalid
application of 'sizeof' to incomplete type 'struct
backlight_properties'
154 | memset(&props, 0, sizeof(struct backlight_properties));
| ^~~~~~
drivers/macintosh/via-pmu-backlight.c:155:22: error:
'BACKLIGHT_PLATFORM' undeclared (first use in this function)
155 | props.type = BACKLIGHT_PLATFORM;
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/macintosh/via-pmu-backlight.c:155:22: note: each undeclared
identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
drivers/macintosh/via-pmu-backlight.c:157:14: error: implicit
declaration of function 'backlight_device_register'; did you mean
'root_device_register'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
157 | bd = backlight_device_register(name, NULL, NULL,
&pmu_backlight_data,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| root_device_register
drivers/macintosh/via-pmu-backlight.c:166:19: error: invalid use of
undefined type 'struct backlight_device'
166 | level = bd->props.max_brightness;
| ^~
drivers/macintosh/via-pmu-backlight.c:176:35: error: invalid use of
undefined type 'struct backlight_device'
176 | bd->props.max_brightness / 15);
| ^~
drivers/macintosh/via-pmu-backlight.c:179:11: error: invalid use of
undefined type 'struct backlight_device'
179 | bd->props.brightness = level;
| ^~
drivers/macintosh/via-pmu-backlight.c:180:11: error: invalid use of
undefined type 'struct backlight_device'
180 | bd->props.power = FB_BLANK_UNBLANK;
| ^~
drivers/macintosh/via-pmu-backlight.c:181:9: error: implicit
declaration of function 'backlight_update_status'; did you mean
'pmu_backlight_update_status'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
181 | backlight_update_status(bd);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| pmu_backlight_update_status
drivers/macintosh/via-pmu-backlight.c:136:37: warning: unused variable
'props' [-Wunused-variable]
136 | struct backlight_properties props;
| ^~~~~
drivers/macintosh/via-pmu-backlight.c: At top level:
drivers/macintosh/via-pmu-backlight.c:108:35: error: storage size of
'pmu_backlight_data' isn't known
108 | static const struct backlight_ops pmu_backlight_data = {
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/macintosh/via-pmu-backlight.c:108:35: error: storage size of
'pmu_backlight_data' isn't known
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
make[5]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:244:
drivers/macintosh/via-pmu-backlight.o] Error 1
Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <[email protected]>
> Michael, if this is fine by you, ack to merge via the drm subsystem
> along with the regressing commit?
>
> BR,
> Jani.
>
> > ---
> > arch/powerpc/include/asm/backlight.h | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/backlight.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/backlight.h
> > index 1b5eab62ed04..275d5bb9aa04 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/backlight.h
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/backlight.h
> > @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
> > #define __ASM_POWERPC_BACKLIGHT_H
> > #ifdef __KERNEL__
> >
> > +#include <linux/backlight.h>
> > #include <linux/fb.h>
> > #include <linux/mutex.h>
>
> --
> Jani Nikula, Intel
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
Le 04/03/2024 à 11:32, Thomas Zimmermann a écrit :
> Hi
>
> Am 04.03.24 um 10:55 schrieb Jani Nikula:
>> Removal of the backlight include from fb.h uncovered an implicit
>> dependency in powerpc asm/backlight.h. Add the explicit include.
>>
>> Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju <[email protected]>
>> Closes:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/r/CA+G9fYsAk5TbqqxFC2W4oHLGA0CbTHMxbeq8QayFXTU75YiueA@mail.gmail.com
>> Fixes: 11b4eedfc87d ("fbdev: Do not include <linux/backlight.h> in
>> header")
>> Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <[email protected]>
>> Cc: Helge Deller <[email protected]>
>> Cc: [email protected]
>> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <[email protected]>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> Not even compile tested!
>
> That's one of the cases that's hard to catch unless you get the config
> right.
>
>> ---
>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/backlight.h | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/backlight.h
>> b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/backlight.h
>> index 1b5eab62ed04..275d5bb9aa04 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/backlight.h
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/backlight.h
>> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
>> #define __ASM_POWERPC_BACKLIGHT_H
>> #ifdef __KERNEL__
>> +#include <linux/backlight.h>
>
> Thanks, but I think this should go directly into chipsfb.c. I would have
> provided a patch already, if our mail server didn't have issues this
> morning. Let me try again.
asm/backlight.h needs it for struct backlight_device
At least if you don't want to include linux/backlight.h in
asm/backlight.h, then you need a forward declaration of struct
backlight_device;
>
> Best regards
> Thomas
>
>> #include <linux/fb.h>
>> #include <linux/mutex.h>
>
Christophe Leroy <[email protected]> writes:
> Le 04/03/2024 à 11:32, Thomas Zimmermann a écrit :
>> Hi
>>
>> Am 04.03.24 um 10:55 schrieb Jani Nikula:
>>> Removal of the backlight include from fb.h uncovered an implicit
>>> dependency in powerpc asm/backlight.h. Add the explicit include.
>>>
>>> Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju <[email protected]>
>>> Closes:
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/r/CA+G9fYsAk5TbqqxFC2W4oHLGA0CbTHMxbeq8QayFXTU75YiueA@mail.gmail.com
>>> Fixes: 11b4eedfc87d ("fbdev: Do not include <linux/backlight.h> in
>>> header")
>>> Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <[email protected]>
>>> Cc: Helge Deller <[email protected]>
>>> Cc: [email protected]
>>> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <[email protected]>
>>>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Not even compile tested!
>>
>> That's one of the cases that's hard to catch unless you get the config
>> right.
>>
>>> ---
>>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/backlight.h | 1 +
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/backlight.h
>>> b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/backlight.h
>>> index 1b5eab62ed04..275d5bb9aa04 100644
>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/backlight.h
>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/backlight.h
>>> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
>>> #define __ASM_POWERPC_BACKLIGHT_H
>>> #ifdef __KERNEL__
>>> +#include <linux/backlight.h>
>>
>> Thanks, but I think this should go directly into chipsfb.c. I would have
>> provided a patch already, if our mail server didn't have issues this
>> morning. Let me try again.
>
> asm/backlight.h needs it for struct backlight_device
>
> At least if you don't want to include linux/backlight.h in
> asm/backlight.h, then you need a forward declaration of struct
> backlight_device;
It's preferable for asm headers not to include linux headers (to avoid
loops), so a forward declaration would be better IMHO.
cheers
Jani Nikula <[email protected]> writes:
> On Mon, 04 Mar 2024, Jani Nikula <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Removal of the backlight include from fb.h uncovered an implicit
>> dependency in powerpc asm/backlight.h. Add the explicit include.
>>
>> Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju <[email protected]>
>> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/CA+G9fYsAk5TbqqxFC2W4oHLGA0CbTHMxbeq8QayFXTU75YiueA@mail.gmail.com
>> Fixes: 11b4eedfc87d ("fbdev: Do not include <linux/backlight.h> in header")
>> Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <[email protected]>
>> Cc: Helge Deller <[email protected]>
>> Cc: [email protected]
>> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <[email protected]>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> Not even compile tested!
>
> Naresh, please try this patch!
>
> Michael, if this is fine by you, ack to merge via the drm subsystem
> along with the regressing commit?
I prefer Thomas' patch, but I'm fine with either to go in via drm.
cheers
Hi
Am 05.03.24 um 01:36 schrieb Michael Ellerman:
> Christophe Leroy <[email protected]> writes:
>> Le 04/03/2024 à 11:32, Thomas Zimmermann a écrit :
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> Am 04.03.24 um 10:55 schrieb Jani Nikula:
>>>> Removal of the backlight include from fb.h uncovered an implicit
>>>> dependency in powerpc asm/backlight.h. Add the explicit include.
>>>>
>>>> Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju <[email protected]>
>>>> Closes:
>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/r/CA+G9fYsAk5TbqqxFC2W4oHLGA0CbTHMxbeq8QayFXTU75YiueA@mail.gmail.com
>>>> Fixes: 11b4eedfc87d ("fbdev: Do not include <linux/backlight.h> in
>>>> header")
>>>> Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <[email protected]>
>>>> Cc: Helge Deller <[email protected]>
>>>> Cc: [email protected]
>>>> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <[email protected]>
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> Not even compile tested!
>>> That's one of the cases that's hard to catch unless you get the config
>>> right.
>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/backlight.h | 1 +
>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/backlight.h
>>>> b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/backlight.h
>>>> index 1b5eab62ed04..275d5bb9aa04 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/backlight.h
>>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/backlight.h
>>>> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
>>>> #define __ASM_POWERPC_BACKLIGHT_H
>>>> #ifdef __KERNEL__
>>>> +#include <linux/backlight.h>
>>> Thanks, but I think this should go directly into chipsfb.c. I would have
>>> provided a patch already, if our mail server didn't have issues this
>>> morning. Let me try again.
>> asm/backlight.h needs it for struct backlight_device
>>
>> At least if you don't want to include linux/backlight.h in
>> asm/backlight.h, then you need a forward declaration of struct
>> backlight_device;
> It's preferable for asm headers not to include linux headers (to avoid
> loops), so a forward declaration would be better IMHO.
The asm header shouldn't include <linux/fb.h> either. I'll send an
update to my patch to clean up everything.
Best regards
Thomas
>
> cheers
--
--
Thomas Zimmermann
Graphics Driver Developer
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
Frankenstrasse 146, 90461 Nuernberg, Germany
GF: Ivo Totev, Andrew Myers, Andrew McDonald, Boudien Moerman
HRB 36809 (AG Nuernberg)
On Tue, 05 Mar 2024, Michael Ellerman <[email protected]> wrote:
> I prefer Thomas' patch, but I'm fine with either to go in via drm.
Thanks!
--
Jani Nikula, Intel