Vasily Averin <[email protected]> wrote:
> Two patches listed below removed ctnetlink_dump_helpinfo call from under
> rcu_read_lock. Now its rcu_dereference generates following warning:
> =============================
> WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
> 5.13.0+ #5 Not tainted
> -----------------------------
> net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c:221 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!
Reviewed-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 11:49:49AM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote:
> Vasily Averin <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Two patches listed below removed ctnetlink_dump_helpinfo call from under
> > rcu_read_lock. Now its rcu_dereference generates following warning:
> > =============================
> > WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
> > 5.13.0+ #5 Not tainted
> > -----------------------------
> > net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c:221 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!
>
> Reviewed-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
I don't see this patch in netfilter's patchwork nor in
[email protected]
Where did they go?
On 6/30/21 3:09 PM, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 11:49:49AM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote:
>> Vasily Averin <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Two patches listed below removed ctnetlink_dump_helpinfo call from under
>>> rcu_read_lock. Now its rcu_dereference generates following warning:
>>> =============================
>>> WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
>>> 5.13.0+ #5 Not tainted
>>> -----------------------------
>>> net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c:221 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
>
> I don't see this patch in netfilter's patchwork nor in
> [email protected]
>
> Where did they go?
My original letter was graylisted.
"
A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
[email protected]
host mail.netfilter.org [217.70.188.207]
SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT TO:<[email protected]>:
450 4.2.0 <[email protected]>: Recipient address rejected:
Greylisted for 60 seconds: retry timeout exceeded
[email protected]
host mail.netfilter.org [217.70.188.207]
SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT TO:<[email protected]>:
450 4.2.0 <[email protected]>: Recipient address rejected:
Greylisted for 60 seconds: retry timeout exceeded
[email protected]
host mail.netfilter.org [217.70.188.207]
SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT TO:<[email protected]>:
450 4.2.0 <[email protected]>: Recipient address rejected:
Greylisted for 60 seconds: retry timeout exceeded
[email protected]
host vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]
SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT TO:<[email protected]>:
451 4.7.1 Hello [185.231.240.75], for recipient address <[email protected]> the policy analysis reported:
Greylisted, see http://postgrey.schweikert.ch/help/vger.kernel.org.html:
retry timeout exceeded
[email protected]
host vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]
SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT TO:<[email protected]>:
451 4.7.1 Hello [185.231.240.75], for recipient address <[email protected]> the policy analysis reported:
Greylisted, see http://postgrey.schweikert.ch/help/vger.kernel.org.html:
retry timeout exceeded
"
I'm expect it will be re-send in few hours.
othrevise I'll resend it once again via another mail server.
Thank you,
Vasily Averin