Hello Alexandre,
On Mon, 10 Dec 2018, Alexandre Ghiti wrote:
> This patch implements both 4MB huge page support for 32bit kernel
> and 2MB/1GB huge pages support for 64bit kernel.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Ghiti <[email protected]>
This patch introduces a few minor checkpatch and strict checkpatch
warnings, when tested against both v4.20 and v5.0-rc1 checkpatch versions.
Could you fix those? The other two patches in the series look OK from
that point of view.
- Paul
On 01/11/2019 07:18 AM, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> Hello Alexandre,
>
> On Mon, 10 Dec 2018, Alexandre Ghiti wrote:
>
>> This patch implements both 4MB huge page support for 32bit kernel
>> and 2MB/1GB huge pages support for 64bit kernel.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Ghiti <[email protected]>
> This patch introduces a few minor checkpatch and strict checkpatch
> warnings, when tested against both v4.20 and v5.0-rc1 checkpatch versions.
> Could you fix those? The other two patches in the series look OK from
> that point of view.
Yes, I had noted those warnings:
- the SPDX warning is weird, in all *.c files, the script seems to
accept only
"// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0" and not "/*
SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */".
But on *.h files, this the contrary, maybe I missed something, I am going
to take a look at the script spdxcheck.py.
Note that kernel/ftrace.c and kernel/perf_event.c raise the same
strange warning.
- I'll change the "printk(KERN_ERR" into a pr_err.
- I'll ignore the last warning regarding the new file.
Thanks for your feedback Paul,
Alex
>
>
> - Paul
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv