2022-04-05 02:04:07

by Tom Rix

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] nvmem: change sp_otp_v0 from global to static

Smatch reports this issue
sunplus-ocotp.c:74:29: warning: symbol 'sp_otp_v0'
was not declared. Should it be static?

sp_otp_v0 is only used in sunplus-ocotp.c. File
scope variables used only in one file should
be static. Change sp_otp_v0's storage-class-specifier
from global to static.

Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <[email protected]>
---
drivers/nvmem/sunplus-ocotp.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/sunplus-ocotp.c b/drivers/nvmem/sunplus-ocotp.c
index 2dc59c22eb55..e0b11e13f5f8 100644
--- a/drivers/nvmem/sunplus-ocotp.c
+++ b/drivers/nvmem/sunplus-ocotp.c
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ struct sp_ocotp_data {
int size;
};

-const struct sp_ocotp_data sp_otp_v0 = {
+static const struct sp_ocotp_data sp_otp_v0 = {
.size = QAC628_OTP_SIZE,
};

--
2.27.0


2022-04-29 15:20:14

by Srinivas Kandagatla

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvmem: change sp_otp_v0 from global to static



On 03/04/2022 14:39, Tom Rix wrote:
> Smatch reports this issue
> sunplus-ocotp.c:74:29: warning: symbol 'sp_otp_v0'
> was not declared. Should it be static?
>
> sp_otp_v0 is only used in sunplus-ocotp.c. File
> scope variables used only in one file should
> be static. Change sp_otp_v0's storage-class-specifier
> from global to static.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <[email protected]>
> ---

There is already a patch for this in next.


--srini
> drivers/nvmem/sunplus-ocotp.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/sunplus-ocotp.c b/drivers/nvmem/sunplus-ocotp.c
> index 2dc59c22eb55..e0b11e13f5f8 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvmem/sunplus-ocotp.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvmem/sunplus-ocotp.c
> @@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ struct sp_ocotp_data {
> int size;
> };
>
> -const struct sp_ocotp_data sp_otp_v0 = {
> +static const struct sp_ocotp_data sp_otp_v0 = {
> .size = QAC628_OTP_SIZE,
> };
>