From: Harry Wei <[email protected]>
When i compile 2.6.39.1, a warning shows like below.
This patch can fix the warning. And i works well with
my PC.
[...]
CC [M] drivers/edac/e752x_edac.o
CC [M] drivers/edac/i82875p_edac.o
CC [M] drivers/edac/i82975x_edac.o
drivers/edac/i82975x_edac.c: In function ���i82975x_process_error_info���:
drivers/edac/i82975x_edac.c:298: warning: integer constant is too large for ���unsigned long��� type
CC [M] drivers/edac/i3000_edac.o
CC [M] drivers/edac/i3200_edac.o
CC [M] drivers/edac/x38_edac.o
CC [M] drivers/edac/i82860_edac.o
[...]
Signed-off-by: Harry Wei <[email protected]>
Index: prj/drivers/edac/i82975x_edac.c
===================================================================
--- prj.orig/drivers/edac/i82975x_edac.c 2011-06-04 10:09:55.351174516 +0800
+++ prj/drivers/edac/i82975x_edac.c 2011-06-04 10:10:30.875168437 +0800
@@ -293,9 +293,9 @@
info->errsts = info->errsts2;
}
- page = (unsigned long) info->eap;
+ page = (unsigned long long) info->eap;
if (info->xeap & 1)
- page |= 0x100000000ul;
+ page |= 0x100000000ull;
chan = page & 1;
page >>= 1;
offst = page & ((1 << PAGE_SHIFT) - 1);
When I compile 3.0.0-rc2+ I don't get this warning.
please make sure this issue still exists.
Connor
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 8:04 PM, Harry Wei <[email protected]> wrote:
> From: Harry Wei <[email protected]>
>
> When i compile 2.6.39.1, a warning shows like below.
> This patch can fix the warning. And i works well with
> my PC.
>
> [...]
> CC [M] drivers/edac/e752x_edac.o
> CC [M] drivers/edac/i82875p_edac.o
> CC [M] drivers/edac/i82975x_edac.o
> drivers/edac/i82975x_edac.c: In function ���i82975x_process_error_info���:
> drivers/edac/i82975x_edac.c:298: warning: integer constant is too large for ���unsigned long��� type
> CC [M] drivers/edac/i3000_edac.o
> CC [M] drivers/edac/i3200_edac.o
> CC [M] drivers/edac/x38_edac.o
> CC [M] drivers/edac/i82860_edac.o
> [...]
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Harry Wei <[email protected]>
> Index: prj/drivers/edac/i82975x_edac.c
> ===================================================================
> --- prj.orig/drivers/edac/i82975x_edac.c 2011-06-04 10:09:55.351174516 +0800
> +++ prj/drivers/edac/i82975x_edac.c 2011-06-04 10:10:30.875168437 +0800
> @@ -293,9 +293,9 @@
> info->errsts = info->errsts2;
> }
>
> - page = (unsigned long) info->eap;
> + page = (unsigned long long) info->eap;
> if (info->xeap & 1)
> - page |= 0x100000000ul;
> + page |= 0x100000000ull;
> chan = page & 1;
> page >>= 1;
> offst = page & ((1 << PAGE_SHIFT) - 1);
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 09:26:46PM -0700, Connor Hansen wrote:
> When I compile 3.0.0-rc2+ I don't get this warning.
> please make sure this issue still exists.
I have not compiled 3.0.0-rc2+, but
i fetch portions of drivers/edac/i82975x_edac.c
of 3.0.0-rc2+ like below.
[...]
296 page = (unsigned long) info->eap;
297 if (info->xeap & 1)
298 page |= 0x100000000ul;
299 chan = page & 1;
300 page >>= 1;
[...]
The following codes prove this warning
remians.
#include <stdio.h>
int main(void)
{
unsigned long a;
a = 0x100000000ul;
printf("%lu\n", a);
return 0;
}
jiawei@jiawei-laptop:~/GTK$ gcc 5.c -Wall -o 1
5.c: In function ‘main’:
5.c:7: warning: integer constant is too large for ‘unsigned long’ type
5.c:7: warning: large integer implicitly truncated to unsigned type
But if you program it like below, it is well for us.
#include <stdio.h>
int main(void)
{
unsigned long long a;
a = 0x100000000ull;
printf("%llu\n", a);
return 0;
}
Thanks
Harry Wei
> Connor
>
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 8:04 PM, Harry Wei <[email protected]> wrote:
> > From: Harry Wei <[email protected]>
> >
> > When i compile 2.6.39.1, a warning shows like below.
> > This patch can fix the warning. And i works well with
> > my PC.
> >
> > [...]
> > CC [M] ??drivers/edac/e752x_edac.o
> > CC [M] ??drivers/edac/i82875p_edac.o
> > CC [M] ??drivers/edac/i82975x_edac.o
> > drivers/edac/i82975x_edac.c: In function ?????????i82975x_process_error_info?????????:
> > drivers/edac/i82975x_edac.c:298: warning: integer constant is too large for ?????????unsigned long????????? type
> > CC [M] ??drivers/edac/i3000_edac.o
> > CC [M] ??drivers/edac/i3200_edac.o
> > CC [M] ??drivers/edac/x38_edac.o
> > CC [M] ??drivers/edac/i82860_edac.o
> > [...]
> >
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Harry Wei <[email protected]>
> > Index: prj/drivers/edac/i82975x_edac.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- prj.orig/drivers/edac/i82975x_edac.c ?? ?? ?? ??2011-06-04 10:09:55.351174516 +0800
> > +++ prj/drivers/edac/i82975x_edac.c ?? ?? 2011-06-04 10:10:30.875168437 +0800
> > @@ -293,9 +293,9 @@
> > ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ??info->errsts = info->errsts2;
> > ?? ?? ?? ??}
> >
> > - ?? ?? ?? page = (unsigned long) info->eap;
> > + ?? ?? ?? page = (unsigned long long) info->eap;
> > ?? ?? ?? ??if (info->xeap & 1)
> > - ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? page |= 0x100000000ul;
> > + ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? page |= 0x100000000ull;
> > ?? ?? ?? ??chan = page & 1;
> > ?? ?? ?? ??page >>= 1;
> > ?? ?? ?? ??offst = page & ((1 << PAGE_SHIFT) - 1);
> > --
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 10:25 PM, Harry Wei <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 09:26:46PM -0700, Connor Hansen wrote:
>> When I compile 3.0.0-rc2+ I don't get this warning.
>> please make sure this issue still exists.
> I have not compiled 3.0.0-rc2+, but
> i fetch portions of drivers/edac/i82975x_edac.c
> of 3.0.0-rc2+ like below.
>
> [...]
> 296 ? ? ? ? page = (unsigned long) info->eap;
> 297 ? ? ? ? if (info->xeap & 1)
> 298 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? page |= 0x100000000ul;
> 299 ? ? ? ? chan = page & 1;
> 300 ? ? ? ? page >>= 1;
> [...]
>
this code is the same in 3.0.0-rc2+ but produces no warning.
> The following codes prove this warning
> remians.
>
> #include <stdio.h>
>
> int main(void)
> {
> ? ? ? ?unsigned long a;
>
> ? ? ? ?a = 0x100000000ul;
> ? ? ? ?printf("%lu\n", a);
> ? ? ? ?return 0;
> }
this is not what the code you are changing does.
the code is not assigned that value, its or'd with it.
a test would be more like.
#include <stdio.h>
int main()
{
unsigned long page; //page
unsigned int b = 5; //info->eap is u32 = unsigned int
// typedef unsigned int __u32;
page = (unsigned long) b;
page |= 0x10000000ul;
printf("%lu\n",page);
return 0;
}
This produces no warning.
$ gcc -g test.c && ./a.out
268435461
$
0x10000000
10000000000000000000000000000
5
00000000000000000000000000101
0x10000000 | 5 =
10000000000000000000000000101
268435461
I am green to kernel development so I will wait for someone with a bit
more knowledge to
chime in, or verify this warning.
Connor
>
> jiawei@jiawei-laptop:~/GTK$ gcc 5.c -Wall -o 1
> 5.c: In function ?main?:
> 5.c:7: warning: integer constant is too large for ?unsigned long? type
> 5.c:7: warning: large integer implicitly truncated to unsigned type
>
> But if you program it like below, it is well for us.
>
> #include <stdio.h>
>
> int main(void)
> {
> ? ? ? ?unsigned long long a;
>
> ? ? ? ?a = 0x100000000ull;
> ? ? ? ?printf("%llu\n", a);
> ? ? ? ?return 0;
> }
>
> Thanks
> Harry Wei
>> Connor
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 8:04 PM, Harry Wei <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > From: Harry Wei <[email protected]>
>> >
>> > When i compile 2.6.39.1, a warning shows like below.
>> > This patch can fix the warning. And i works well with
>> > my PC.
>> >
>> > [...]
>> > CC [M] ??drivers/edac/e752x_edac.o
>> > CC [M] ??drivers/edac/i82875p_edac.o
>> > CC [M] ??drivers/edac/i82975x_edac.o
>> > drivers/edac/i82975x_edac.c: In function ?????????i82975x_process_error_info?????????:
>> > drivers/edac/i82975x_edac.c:298: warning: integer constant is too large for ?????????unsigned long????????? type
>> > CC [M] ??drivers/edac/i3000_edac.o
>> > CC [M] ??drivers/edac/i3200_edac.o
>> > CC [M] ??drivers/edac/x38_edac.o
>> > CC [M] ??drivers/edac/i82860_edac.o
>> > [...]
>> >
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Harry Wei <[email protected]>
>> > Index: prj/drivers/edac/i82975x_edac.c
>> > ===================================================================
>> > --- prj.orig/drivers/edac/i82975x_edac.c ?? ?? ?? ??2011-06-04 10:09:55.351174516 +0800
>> > +++ prj/drivers/edac/i82975x_edac.c ?? ?? 2011-06-04 10:10:30.875168437 +0800
>> > @@ -293,9 +293,9 @@
>> > ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ??info->errsts = info->errsts2;
>> > ?? ?? ?? ??}
>> >
>> > - ?? ?? ?? page = (unsigned long) info->eap;
>> > + ?? ?? ?? page = (unsigned long long) info->eap;
>> > ?? ?? ?? ??if (info->xeap & 1)
>> > - ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? page |= 0x100000000ul;
>> > + ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? page |= 0x100000000ull;
>> > ?? ?? ?? ??chan = page & 1;
>> > ?? ?? ?? ??page >>= 1;
>> > ?? ?? ?? ??offst = page & ((1 << PAGE_SHIFT) - 1);
>> > --
>
On 06/08/11 21:26, Connor Hansen wrote:
> When I compile 3.0.0-rc2+ I don't get this warning.
> please make sure this issue still exists.
>
It still happens for me -- but only on i386 (X86_32).
Did you build for 32-bit target?
--
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
On Thu, 9 Jun 2011 11:04:13 +0800 Harry Wei wrote:
> From: Harry Wei <[email protected]>
>
> When i compile 2.6.39.1, a warning shows like below.
> This patch can fix the warning. And i works well with
> my PC.
>
> [...]
> CC [M] drivers/edac/e752x_edac.o
> CC [M] drivers/edac/i82875p_edac.o
> CC [M] drivers/edac/i82975x_edac.o
> drivers/edac/i82975x_edac.c: In function ���i82975x_process_error_info���:
> drivers/edac/i82975x_edac.c:298: warning: integer constant is too large for ���unsigned long��� type
> CC [M] drivers/edac/i3000_edac.o
> CC [M] drivers/edac/i3200_edac.o
> CC [M] drivers/edac/x38_edac.o
> CC [M] drivers/edac/i82860_edac.o
> [...]
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Harry Wei <[email protected]>
> Index: prj/drivers/edac/i82975x_edac.c
> ===================================================================
> --- prj.orig/drivers/edac/i82975x_edac.c 2011-06-04 10:09:55.351174516 +0800
> +++ prj/drivers/edac/i82975x_edac.c 2011-06-04 10:10:30.875168437 +0800
> @@ -293,9 +293,9 @@
> info->errsts = info->errsts2;
> }
>
> - page = (unsigned long) info->eap;
> + page = (unsigned long long) info->eap;
But page is still unsigned long, not unsigned long long...
> if (info->xeap & 1)
> - page |= 0x100000000ul;
> + page |= 0x100000000ull;
and just making this second change fixes the warning.
I don't know what the right answer is, but this patch does not look
complete to me.
Back in April there was a discussion about this warning message and the
conclusion was that this driver should be replaced. See
https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/4/21/232 and its replies.
But we seem to be having problems reaching the EDAC subsystem maintainer
(again cc-ed).
> chan = page & 1;
> page >>= 1;
> offst = page & ((1 << PAGE_SHIFT) - 1);
> --
---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 11:17:21PM -0700, Connor Hansen wrote:
>
> this is not what the code you are changing does.
>
> the code is not assigned that value, its or'd with it.
>
> a test would be more like.
>
> #include <stdio.h>
> int main()
> {
> unsigned long page; //page
> unsigned int b = 5; //info->eap is u32 = unsigned int
> // typedef unsigned int __u32;
> page = (unsigned long) b;
> page |= 0x10000000ul;
>
> printf("%lu\n",page);
>
> return 0;
> }
>
> This produces no warning.
> $ gcc -g test.c && ./a.out
> 268435461
> $
>
> 0x10000000
> 10000000000000000000000000000
> 5
> 00000000000000000000000000101
> 0x10000000 | 5 =
> 10000000000000000000000000101
> 268435461
>
> I am green to kernel development so I will wait for someone with a bit
> more knowledge to
> chime in, or verify this warning.
> Connor
You are right, but it really has warnings yet.
My PC is also 32-bits.
Thanks
Harry Wei
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 10:37:47AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Jun 2011 11:04:13 +0800 Harry Wei wrote:
>
> > - page = (unsigned long) info->eap;
> > + page = (unsigned long long) info->eap;
>
> But page is still unsigned long, not unsigned long long...
Yup, but if we can define a 'unsigned long long' type?
>
> > if (info->xeap & 1)
> > - page |= 0x100000000ul;
> > + page |= 0x100000000ull;
>
> and just making this second change fixes the warning.
I will try my best. Can anyone give some other comments?
>
> I don't know what the right answer is, but this patch does not look
> complete to me.
I will try to give a v2.
>
> Back in April there was a discussion about this warning message and the
> conclusion was that this driver should be replaced. See
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/4/21/232 and its replies.
> But we seem to be having problems reaching the EDAC subsystem maintainer
> (again cc-ed).
You have not got a exact conclusion about this warning.
Maybe Arvind knows more about this warning.(cc'ed)
Thanks
Harry Wei
My system is 64bit, thus not showing a warning
adding cc to maintainer, and dev list
2011/6/9 Harry Wei <[email protected]>:
> On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 10:37:47AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> On Thu, 9 Jun 2011 11:04:13 +0800 Harry Wei wrote:
>>
>> > - page = (unsigned long) info->eap;
>> > + page = (unsigned long long) info->eap;
>>
>> But page is still unsigned long, not unsigned long long...
> Yup, but if we can define a 'unsigned long long' type?
>>
>> > if (info->xeap & 1)
>> > - page |= 0x100000000ul;
>> > + page |= 0x100000000ull;
>>
>> and just making this second change fixes the warning.
> I will try my best. Can anyone give some other comments?
>>
>> I don't know what the right answer is, but this patch does not look
>> complete to me.
> I will try to give a v2.
>>
>> Back in April there was a discussion about this warning message and the
>> conclusion was that this driver should be replaced. See
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/4/21/232 and its replies.
>> But we seem to be having problems reaching the EDAC subsystem maintainer
>> (again cc-ed).
> You have not got a exact conclusion about this warning.
> Maybe Arvind knows more about this warning.(cc'ed)
>
>
> Thanks
> Harry Wei
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
older convo for new cc's
On Thu, 9 Jun 2011 11:04:13 +0800 Harry Wei wrote:
> From: Harry Wei <[email protected]>
>
> When i compile 2.6.39.1, a warning shows like below.
> This patch can fix the warning. And i works well with
> my PC.
>
> [...]
> CC [M] drivers/edac/e752x_edac.o
> CC [M] drivers/edac/i82875p_edac.o
> CC [M] drivers/edac/i82975x_edac.o
> drivers/edac/i82975x_edac.c: In function ���i82975x_process_error_info���:
> drivers/edac/i82975x_edac.c:298: warning: integer constant is too large for ���unsigned long��� type
> CC [M] drivers/edac/i3000_edac.o
> CC [M] drivers/edac/i3200_edac.o
> CC [M] drivers/edac/x38_edac.o
> CC [M] drivers/edac/i82860_edac.o
> [...]
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Harry Wei <[email protected]>
> Index: prj/drivers/edac/i82975x_edac.c
> ===================================================================
> --- prj.orig/drivers/edac/i82975x_edac.c 2011-06-04 10:09:55.351174516 +0800
> +++ prj/drivers/edac/i82975x_edac.c 2011-06-04 10:10:30.875168437 +0800
> @@ -293,9 +293,9 @@
> info->errsts = info->errsts2;
> }
>
> - page = (unsigned long) info->eap;
> + page = (unsigned long long) info->eap;
But page is still unsigned long, not unsigned long long...
> if (info->xeap & 1)
> - page |= 0x100000000ul;
> + page |= 0x100000000ull;
and just making this second change fixes the warning.
I don't know what the right answer is, but this patch does not look
complete to me.
Back in April there was a discussion about this warning message and the
conclusion was that this driver should be replaced. See
https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/4/21/232 and its replies.
But we seem to be having problems reaching the EDAC subsystem maintainer
(again cc-ed).
> chan = page & 1;
> page >>= 1;
> offst = page & ((1 << PAGE_SHIFT) - 1);
> --
---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
- Show quoted text -
Hi,
My system is broken currently, so I'm unable to check:(
But the foll. patch should fix the problem for 64 and 32 bits AND work
correct wrt.
to error-info. Would be glad if can check, please.
--- linux-2.6.39.1.orig/drivers/edac/i82975x_edac.c 2011-05-19 09:36:34 +0530
+++ linux-2.6.39.1/drivers/edac/i82975x_edac.c 2011-06-12 21:03:37 +0530
@@ -294,12 +294,12 @@
}
page = (unsigned long) info->eap;
- if (info->xeap & 1)
- page |= 0x100000000ul;
chan = page & 1;
- page >>= 1;
offst = page & ((1 << PAGE_SHIFT) - 1);
- page >>= PAGE_SHIFT;
+ page >>= 1;
+ if (info->xeap & 1)
+ page |= 0x80000000;
+ page >>= (PAGE_SHIFT - 1);
row = edac_mc_find_csrow_by_page(mci, page);
if (info->errsts & 0x0002)
- arvind