2020-04-24 11:39:16

by Jose Abreu

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] scsi: ufs: Allow UFS 3.0 as a valid version

Add a define for UFS version 3.0 and do not print an error message upon
probe when using this version.

Signed-off-by: Joao Lima <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jose Abreu <[email protected]>

---
Cc: Joao Lima <[email protected]>
Cc: Jose Abreu <[email protected]>
Cc: Alim Akhtar <[email protected]>
Cc: Avri Altman <[email protected]>
Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <[email protected]>
Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
---
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 3 ++-
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshci.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
index 7d1fa1349d40..2e5c200e915b 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
@@ -8441,7 +8441,8 @@ int ufshcd_init(struct ufs_hba *hba, void __iomem *mmio_base, unsigned int irq)
if ((hba->ufs_version != UFSHCI_VERSION_10) &&
(hba->ufs_version != UFSHCI_VERSION_11) &&
(hba->ufs_version != UFSHCI_VERSION_20) &&
- (hba->ufs_version != UFSHCI_VERSION_21))
+ (hba->ufs_version != UFSHCI_VERSION_21) &&
+ (hba->ufs_version != UFSHCI_VERSION_30))
dev_err(hba->dev, "invalid UFS version 0x%x\n",
hba->ufs_version);

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshci.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshci.h
index c2961d37cc1c..f2ee81669b00 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshci.h
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshci.h
@@ -104,6 +104,7 @@ enum {
UFSHCI_VERSION_11 = 0x00010100, /* 1.1 */
UFSHCI_VERSION_20 = 0x00000200, /* 2.0 */
UFSHCI_VERSION_21 = 0x00000210, /* 2.1 */
+ UFSHCI_VERSION_30 = 0x00000300, /* 3.0 */
};

/*
--
2.7.4


2020-04-24 12:02:16

by Winkler, Tomas

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/5] scsi: ufs: Allow UFS 3.0 as a valid version

> Add a define for UFS version 3.0 and do not print an error message upon probe
> when using this version.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joao Lima <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Jose Abreu <[email protected]>
LGTM
Thanks
Tomas
>
> ---
> Cc: Joao Lima <[email protected]>
> Cc: Jose Abreu <[email protected]>
> Cc: Alim Akhtar <[email protected]>
> Cc: Avri Altman <[email protected]>
> Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <[email protected]>
> Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> ---
> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 3 ++-
> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshci.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c index
> 7d1fa1349d40..2e5c200e915b 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> @@ -8441,7 +8441,8 @@ int ufshcd_init(struct ufs_hba *hba, void __iomem
> *mmio_base, unsigned int irq)
> if ((hba->ufs_version != UFSHCI_VERSION_10) &&
> (hba->ufs_version != UFSHCI_VERSION_11) &&
> (hba->ufs_version != UFSHCI_VERSION_20) &&
> - (hba->ufs_version != UFSHCI_VERSION_21))
> + (hba->ufs_version != UFSHCI_VERSION_21) &&
> + (hba->ufs_version != UFSHCI_VERSION_30))
> dev_err(hba->dev, "invalid UFS version 0x%x\n",
> hba->ufs_version);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshci.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshci.h index
> c2961d37cc1c..f2ee81669b00 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshci.h
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshci.h
> @@ -104,6 +104,7 @@ enum {
> UFSHCI_VERSION_11 = 0x00010100, /* 1.1 */
> UFSHCI_VERSION_20 = 0x00000200, /* 2.0 */
> UFSHCI_VERSION_21 = 0x00000210, /* 2.1 */
> + UFSHCI_VERSION_30 = 0x00000300, /* 3.0 */
> };
>
> /*
> --
> 2.7.4

2020-04-24 12:13:25

by Alim Akhtar

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/5] scsi: ufs: Allow UFS 3.0 as a valid version

Hello Jose,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jose Abreu <[email protected]>
> Sent: 24 April 2020 17:07
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: Joao Pinto <[email protected]>; Jose Abreu
> <[email protected]>; Joao Lima <[email protected]>; Alim
> Akhtar <[email protected]>; Avri Altman <[email protected]>;
> James E.J. Bottomley <[email protected]>; Martin K. Petersen
> <[email protected]>; [email protected]
> Subject: [PATCH 1/5] scsi: ufs: Allow UFS 3.0 as a valid version
>
> Add a define for UFS version 3.0 and do not print an error message upon
probe
> when using this version.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joao Lima <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Jose Abreu <[email protected]>
>
Reviewed-by: Alim Akhtar <[email protected]>

> ---
> Cc: Joao Lima <[email protected]>
> Cc: Jose Abreu <[email protected]>
> Cc: Alim Akhtar <[email protected]>
> Cc: Avri Altman <[email protected]>
> Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <[email protected]>
> Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> ---
> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 3 ++-
> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshci.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c index
> 7d1fa1349d40..2e5c200e915b 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> @@ -8441,7 +8441,8 @@ int ufshcd_init(struct ufs_hba *hba, void __iomem
> *mmio_base, unsigned int irq)
> if ((hba->ufs_version != UFSHCI_VERSION_10) &&
> (hba->ufs_version != UFSHCI_VERSION_11) &&
> (hba->ufs_version != UFSHCI_VERSION_20) &&
> - (hba->ufs_version != UFSHCI_VERSION_21))
> + (hba->ufs_version != UFSHCI_VERSION_21) &&
> + (hba->ufs_version != UFSHCI_VERSION_30))
> dev_err(hba->dev, "invalid UFS version 0x%x\n",
> hba->ufs_version);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshci.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshci.h index
> c2961d37cc1c..f2ee81669b00 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshci.h
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshci.h
> @@ -104,6 +104,7 @@ enum {
> UFSHCI_VERSION_11 = 0x00010100, /* 1.1 */
> UFSHCI_VERSION_20 = 0x00000200, /* 2.0 */
> UFSHCI_VERSION_21 = 0x00000210, /* 2.1 */
> + UFSHCI_VERSION_30 = 0x00000300, /* 3.0 */
> };
>
> /*
> --
> 2.7.4


2020-04-25 11:15:28

by Christoph Hellwig

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] scsi: ufs: Allow UFS 3.0 as a valid version

On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 01:36:56PM +0200, Jose Abreu wrote:
> Add a define for UFS version 3.0 and do not print an error message upon
> probe when using this version.

This doesn't really scale. Version checks only make sense for a minimum
supported version. Rejecting newer versions is just a bad idea.

> @@ -8441,7 +8441,8 @@ int ufshcd_init(struct ufs_hba *hba, void __iomem *mmio_base, unsigned int irq)
> if ((hba->ufs_version != UFSHCI_VERSION_10) &&
> (hba->ufs_version != UFSHCI_VERSION_11) &&
> (hba->ufs_version != UFSHCI_VERSION_20) &&
> - (hba->ufs_version != UFSHCI_VERSION_21))
> + (hba->ufs_version != UFSHCI_VERSION_21) &&
> + (hba->ufs_version != UFSHCI_VERSION_30))

i.e. this should become

if (hba->ufs_version < UFSHCI_VERSION_10)

as an additional cleanup I think it makes more sense t use a UFSHCI_VER()
macro similar to KERNEL_VERSION() or NVME_VS() instead of adding a new
define for every version.

2020-04-27 07:52:30

by Jose Abreu

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/5] scsi: ufs: Allow UFS 3.0 as a valid version

From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
Date: Apr/25/2020, 12:10:56 (UTC+00:00)

> On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 01:36:56PM +0200, Jose Abreu wrote:
> > Add a define for UFS version 3.0 and do not print an error message upon
> > probe when using this version.
>
> This doesn't really scale. Version checks only make sense for a minimum
> supported version. Rejecting newer versions is just a bad idea.
>
> > @@ -8441,7 +8441,8 @@ int ufshcd_init(struct ufs_hba *hba, void __iomem *mmio_base, unsigned int irq)
> > if ((hba->ufs_version != UFSHCI_VERSION_10) &&
> > (hba->ufs_version != UFSHCI_VERSION_11) &&
> > (hba->ufs_version != UFSHCI_VERSION_20) &&
> > - (hba->ufs_version != UFSHCI_VERSION_21))
> > + (hba->ufs_version != UFSHCI_VERSION_21) &&
> > + (hba->ufs_version != UFSHCI_VERSION_30))
>
> i.e. this should become
>
> if (hba->ufs_version < UFSHCI_VERSION_10)
>
> as an additional cleanup I think it makes more sense t use a UFSHCI_VER()
> macro similar to KERNEL_VERSION() or NVME_VS() instead of adding a new
> define for every version.

Yeah, unfortunately I don't think this can be done because of this:

enum {
UFSHCI_VERSION_10 = 0x00010000, /* 1.0 */
UFSHCI_VERSION_11 = 0x00010100, /* 1.1 */
UFSHCI_VERSION_20 = 0x00000200, /* 2.0 */
UFSHCI_VERSION_21 = 0x00000210, /* 2.1 */
};

So, version 1.0 and 1.1 have higher values of 2.0 and 2.1 in terms of
absolute value.

---
Thanks,
Jose Miguel Abreu