2024-02-13 21:57:56

by Zi Yan

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v4 2/7] mm/page_owner: use order instead of nr in split_page_owner()

From: Zi Yan <[email protected]>

We do not have non power of two pages, using nr is error prone if nr
is not power-of-two. Use page order instead.

Signed-off-by: Zi Yan <[email protected]>
---
include/linux/page_owner.h | 8 ++++----
mm/huge_memory.c | 2 +-
mm/page_alloc.c | 4 ++--
mm/page_owner.c | 3 ++-
4 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/page_owner.h b/include/linux/page_owner.h
index 119a0c9d2a8b..d7878523adfc 100644
--- a/include/linux/page_owner.h
+++ b/include/linux/page_owner.h
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ extern struct page_ext_operations page_owner_ops;
extern void __reset_page_owner(struct page *page, unsigned short order);
extern void __set_page_owner(struct page *page,
unsigned short order, gfp_t gfp_mask);
-extern void __split_page_owner(struct page *page, unsigned int nr);
+extern void __split_page_owner(struct page *page, int order);
extern void __folio_copy_owner(struct folio *newfolio, struct folio *old);
extern void __set_page_owner_migrate_reason(struct page *page, int reason);
extern void __dump_page_owner(const struct page *page);
@@ -31,10 +31,10 @@ static inline void set_page_owner(struct page *page,
__set_page_owner(page, order, gfp_mask);
}

-static inline void split_page_owner(struct page *page, unsigned int nr)
+static inline void split_page_owner(struct page *page, int order)
{
if (static_branch_unlikely(&page_owner_inited))
- __split_page_owner(page, nr);
+ __split_page_owner(page, order);
}
static inline void folio_copy_owner(struct folio *newfolio, struct folio *old)
{
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ static inline void set_page_owner(struct page *page,
{
}
static inline void split_page_owner(struct page *page,
- unsigned short order)
+ int order)
{
}
static inline void folio_copy_owner(struct folio *newfolio, struct folio *folio)
diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
index 0cd5fba0923c..f079b02f1f59 100644
--- a/mm/huge_memory.c
+++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
@@ -2919,7 +2919,7 @@ static void __split_huge_page(struct page *page, struct list_head *list,
unlock_page_lruvec(lruvec);
/* Caller disabled irqs, so they are still disabled here */

- split_page_owner(head, nr);
+ split_page_owner(head, order);

/* See comment in __split_huge_page_tail() */
if (PageAnon(head)) {
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index 7c927b84e16c..b6e8fe6fed67 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -2652,7 +2652,7 @@ void split_page(struct page *page, unsigned int order)

for (i = 1; i < (1 << order); i++)
set_page_refcounted(page + i);
- split_page_owner(page, 1 << order);
+ split_page_owner(page, order);
split_page_memcg(page, order);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(split_page);
@@ -4837,7 +4837,7 @@ static void *make_alloc_exact(unsigned long addr, unsigned int order,
struct page *page = virt_to_page((void *)addr);
struct page *last = page + nr;

- split_page_owner(page, 1 << order);
+ split_page_owner(page, order);
split_page_memcg(page, order);
while (page < --last)
set_page_refcounted(last);
diff --git a/mm/page_owner.c b/mm/page_owner.c
index c4f9e5506e93..1319e402c2cf 100644
--- a/mm/page_owner.c
+++ b/mm/page_owner.c
@@ -292,11 +292,12 @@ void __set_page_owner_migrate_reason(struct page *page, int reason)
page_ext_put(page_ext);
}

-void __split_page_owner(struct page *page, unsigned int nr)
+void __split_page_owner(struct page *page, int order)
{
int i;
struct page_ext *page_ext = page_ext_get(page);
struct page_owner *page_owner;
+ unsigned int nr = 1 << order;

if (unlikely(!page_ext))
return;
--
2.43.0



2024-02-14 09:14:26

by David Hildenbrand

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/7] mm/page_owner: use order instead of nr in split_page_owner()

On 13.02.24 22:55, Zi Yan wrote:
> From: Zi Yan <[email protected]>
>
> We do not have non power of two pages, using nr is error prone if nr
> is not power-of-two. Use page order instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zi Yan <[email protected]>
> ---
> include/linux/page_owner.h | 8 ++++----
> mm/huge_memory.c | 2 +-
> mm/page_alloc.c | 4 ++--
> mm/page_owner.c | 3 ++-
> 4 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/page_owner.h b/include/linux/page_owner.h
> index 119a0c9d2a8b..d7878523adfc 100644
> --- a/include/linux/page_owner.h
> +++ b/include/linux/page_owner.h
> @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ extern struct page_ext_operations page_owner_ops;
> extern void __reset_page_owner(struct page *page, unsigned short order);
> extern void __set_page_owner(struct page *page,
> unsigned short order, gfp_t gfp_mask);
> -extern void __split_page_owner(struct page *page, unsigned int nr);
> +extern void __split_page_owner(struct page *page, int order);
> extern void __folio_copy_owner(struct folio *newfolio, struct folio *old);
> extern void __set_page_owner_migrate_reason(struct page *page, int reason);
> extern void __dump_page_owner(const struct page *page);
> @@ -31,10 +31,10 @@ static inline void set_page_owner(struct page *page,
> __set_page_owner(page, order, gfp_mask);
> }
>
> -static inline void split_page_owner(struct page *page, unsigned int nr)
> +static inline void split_page_owner(struct page *page, int order)
> {
> if (static_branch_unlikely(&page_owner_inited))
> - __split_page_owner(page, nr);
> + __split_page_owner(page, order);
> }
> static inline void folio_copy_owner(struct folio *newfolio, struct folio *old)
> {
> @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ static inline void set_page_owner(struct page *page,
> {
> }
> static inline void split_page_owner(struct page *page,
> - unsigned short order)
> + int order)

I assume this will fit into a single line now.



Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <[email protected]>

--
Cheers,

David / dhildenb


2024-02-14 15:22:39

by Zi Yan

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/7] mm/page_owner: use order instead of nr in split_page_owner()

On 14 Feb 2024, at 4:14, David Hildenbrand wrote:

> On 13.02.24 22:55, Zi Yan wrote:
>> From: Zi Yan <[email protected]>
>>
>> We do not have non power of two pages, using nr is error prone if nr
>> is not power-of-two. Use page order instead.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zi Yan <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> include/linux/page_owner.h | 8 ++++----
>> mm/huge_memory.c | 2 +-
>> mm/page_alloc.c | 4 ++--
>> mm/page_owner.c | 3 ++-
>> 4 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/page_owner.h b/include/linux/page_owner.h
>> index 119a0c9d2a8b..d7878523adfc 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/page_owner.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/page_owner.h
>> @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ extern struct page_ext_operations page_owner_ops;
>> extern void __reset_page_owner(struct page *page, unsigned short order);
>> extern void __set_page_owner(struct page *page,
>> unsigned short order, gfp_t gfp_mask);
>> -extern void __split_page_owner(struct page *page, unsigned int nr);
>> +extern void __split_page_owner(struct page *page, int order);
>> extern void __folio_copy_owner(struct folio *newfolio, struct folio *old);
>> extern void __set_page_owner_migrate_reason(struct page *page, int reason);
>> extern void __dump_page_owner(const struct page *page);
>> @@ -31,10 +31,10 @@ static inline void set_page_owner(struct page *page,
>> __set_page_owner(page, order, gfp_mask);
>> }
>> -static inline void split_page_owner(struct page *page, unsigned int nr)
>> +static inline void split_page_owner(struct page *page, int order)
>> {
>> if (static_branch_unlikely(&page_owner_inited))
>> - __split_page_owner(page, nr);
>> + __split_page_owner(page, order);
>> }
>> static inline void folio_copy_owner(struct folio *newfolio, struct folio *old)
>> {
>> @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ static inline void set_page_owner(struct page *page,
>> {
>> }
>> static inline void split_page_owner(struct page *page,
>> - unsigned short order)
>> + int order)
>
> I assume this will fit into a single line now.

Sure.
>
> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <[email protected]>

Thanks.

--
Best Regards,
Yan, Zi


Attachments:
signature.asc (871.00 B)
OpenPGP digital signature