2015-08-14 13:21:53

by Lubomir Rintel

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] kdbus: create /sys/fs/kdbus with sysfs_create_mount_point()

Since 0cbee99269 user-namespace pull, if a kdbusfs is mounted on a
location that's not created with sysfs_create_mount_point the user
namespaces are not allowed to mount their sysfs instances.

Signed-off-by: Lubomir Rintel <[email protected]>
---
Applies on top of char-misc/kdbus a36324913.

ipc/kdbus/main.c | 13 +++++--------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/ipc/kdbus/main.c b/ipc/kdbus/main.c
index 1ad4dc8..c2117ea 100644
--- a/ipc/kdbus/main.c
+++ b/ipc/kdbus/main.c
@@ -75,16 +75,13 @@
* '» struct kdbus_ep *ep (owned)
*/

-/* kdbus mount-point /sys/fs/kdbus */
-static struct kobject *kdbus_dir;
-
static int __init kdbus_init(void)
{
int ret;

- kdbus_dir = kobject_create_and_add(KBUILD_MODNAME, fs_kobj);
- if (!kdbus_dir)
- return -ENOMEM;
+ ret = sysfs_create_mount_point(fs_kobj, KBUILD_MODNAME);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;

ret = kdbus_fs_init();
if (ret < 0) {
@@ -96,14 +93,14 @@ static int __init kdbus_init(void)
return 0;

exit_dir:
- kobject_put(kdbus_dir);
+ sysfs_remove_mount_point(fs_kobj, KBUILD_MODNAME);
return ret;
}

static void __exit kdbus_exit(void)
{
kdbus_fs_exit();
- kobject_put(kdbus_dir);
+ sysfs_remove_mount_point(fs_kobj, KBUILD_MODNAME);
ida_destroy(&kdbus_node_ida);
}

--
2.4.3


2015-08-17 17:23:34

by David Herrmann

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kdbus: create /sys/fs/kdbus with sysfs_create_mount_point()

Hi

On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Lubomir Rintel <[email protected]> wrote:
> Since 0cbee99269 user-namespace pull, if a kdbusfs is mounted on a
> location that's not created with sysfs_create_mount_point the user
> namespaces are not allowed to mount their sysfs instances.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lubomir Rintel <[email protected]>
> ---
> Applies on top of char-misc/kdbus a36324913.

This does not apply on top of char-misc/kdbus. The tree lacks the
necessary commits. But yeah, it's required for 4.2. I'll keep it
starred until Greg back-merges 4.2.

Anyway, this is still: Reviewed-by: David Herrmann <[email protected]>

Thanks!
David

> ipc/kdbus/main.c | 13 +++++--------
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/ipc/kdbus/main.c b/ipc/kdbus/main.c
> index 1ad4dc8..c2117ea 100644
> --- a/ipc/kdbus/main.c
> +++ b/ipc/kdbus/main.c
> @@ -75,16 +75,13 @@
> * '» struct kdbus_ep *ep (owned)
> */
>
> -/* kdbus mount-point /sys/fs/kdbus */
> -static struct kobject *kdbus_dir;
> -
> static int __init kdbus_init(void)
> {
> int ret;
>
> - kdbus_dir = kobject_create_and_add(KBUILD_MODNAME, fs_kobj);
> - if (!kdbus_dir)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> + ret = sysfs_create_mount_point(fs_kobj, KBUILD_MODNAME);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
>
> ret = kdbus_fs_init();
> if (ret < 0) {
> @@ -96,14 +93,14 @@ static int __init kdbus_init(void)
> return 0;
>
> exit_dir:
> - kobject_put(kdbus_dir);
> + sysfs_remove_mount_point(fs_kobj, KBUILD_MODNAME);
> return ret;
> }
>
> static void __exit kdbus_exit(void)
> {
> kdbus_fs_exit();
> - kobject_put(kdbus_dir);
> + sysfs_remove_mount_point(fs_kobj, KBUILD_MODNAME);
> ida_destroy(&kdbus_node_ida);
> }
>
> --
> 2.4.3
>

2015-08-17 20:52:30

by Josh Boyer

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kdbus: create /sys/fs/kdbus with sysfs_create_mount_point()

On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 1:23 PM, David Herrmann <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Lubomir Rintel <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Since 0cbee99269 user-namespace pull, if a kdbusfs is mounted on a
>> location that's not created with sysfs_create_mount_point the user
>> namespaces are not allowed to mount their sysfs instances.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lubomir Rintel <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> Applies on top of char-misc/kdbus a36324913.
>
> This does not apply on top of char-misc/kdbus. The tree lacks the
> necessary commits. But yeah, it's required for 4.2. I'll keep it
> starred until Greg back-merges 4.2.
>
> Anyway, this is still: Reviewed-by: David Herrmann <[email protected]>

Grumble. Keeping track of this is getting to be somewhat of a pain.
Why isn't the kdbus-next branch already at 4.2?

So if one was carrying the contents of char-misc/kdbus as stand-alone
patches on top of 4.2-rc7, should your Reviewed-by count as "yes,
apply this patch in that instance?"

josh