Since commit 177366bf7ceb the %rbp stopped pointing to %rbp of the
previous stack frame. That broke frame pointer based stack unwinding.
This commit is a partial revert of it.
Note that the location of tail_call_cnt is fixed, since the verifier
enforces MAX_BPF_STACK stack size for programs with tail calls.
Fixes: 177366bf7ceb ("bpf: change x86 JITed program stack layout")
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
---
arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 74 +++++++++++--------------------------
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index afabf597c855..d88bc0935886 100644
--- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -190,9 +190,7 @@ struct jit_context {
#define BPF_MAX_INSN_SIZE 128
#define BPF_INSN_SAFETY 64
-#define AUX_STACK_SPACE 40 /* Space for RBX, R13, R14, R15, tailcnt */
-
-#define PROLOGUE_SIZE 37
+#define PROLOGUE_SIZE 20
/*
* Emit x86-64 prologue code for BPF program and check its size.
@@ -203,44 +201,19 @@ static void emit_prologue(u8 **pprog, u32 stack_depth, bool ebpf_from_cbpf)
u8 *prog = *pprog;
int cnt = 0;
- /* push rbp */
- EMIT1(0x55);
-
- /* mov rbp,rsp */
- EMIT3(0x48, 0x89, 0xE5);
-
- /* sub rsp, rounded_stack_depth + AUX_STACK_SPACE */
- EMIT3_off32(0x48, 0x81, 0xEC,
- round_up(stack_depth, 8) + AUX_STACK_SPACE);
-
- /* sub rbp, AUX_STACK_SPACE */
- EMIT4(0x48, 0x83, 0xED, AUX_STACK_SPACE);
-
- /* mov qword ptr [rbp+0],rbx */
- EMIT4(0x48, 0x89, 0x5D, 0);
- /* mov qword ptr [rbp+8],r13 */
- EMIT4(0x4C, 0x89, 0x6D, 8);
- /* mov qword ptr [rbp+16],r14 */
- EMIT4(0x4C, 0x89, 0x75, 16);
- /* mov qword ptr [rbp+24],r15 */
- EMIT4(0x4C, 0x89, 0x7D, 24);
-
+ EMIT1(0x55); /* push rbp */
+ EMIT3(0x48, 0x89, 0xE5); /* mov rbp, rsp */
+ /* sub rsp, rounded_stack_depth */
+ EMIT3_off32(0x48, 0x81, 0xEC, round_up(stack_depth, 8));
+ EMIT1(0x53); /* push rbx */
+ EMIT2(0x41, 0x55); /* push r13 */
+ EMIT2(0x41, 0x56); /* push r14 */
+ EMIT2(0x41, 0x57); /* push r15 */
if (!ebpf_from_cbpf) {
- /*
- * Clear the tail call counter (tail_call_cnt): for eBPF tail
- * calls we need to reset the counter to 0. It's done in two
- * instructions, resetting RAX register to 0, and moving it
- * to the counter location.
- */
-
- /* xor eax, eax */
- EMIT2(0x31, 0xc0);
- /* mov qword ptr [rbp+32], rax */
- EMIT4(0x48, 0x89, 0x45, 32);
-
+ /* zero init tail_call_cnt */
+ EMIT2(0x6a, 0x00);
BUILD_BUG_ON(cnt != PROLOGUE_SIZE);
}
-
*pprog = prog;
}
@@ -285,13 +258,13 @@ static void emit_bpf_tail_call(u8 **pprog)
* if (tail_call_cnt > MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT)
* goto out;
*/
- EMIT2_off32(0x8B, 0x85, 36); /* mov eax, dword ptr [rbp + 36] */
+ EMIT2_off32(0x8B, 0x85, -36 - MAX_BPF_STACK); /* mov eax, dword ptr [rbp - 548] */
EMIT3(0x83, 0xF8, MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT); /* cmp eax, MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT */
#define OFFSET2 (30 + RETPOLINE_RAX_BPF_JIT_SIZE)
EMIT2(X86_JA, OFFSET2); /* ja out */
label2 = cnt;
EMIT3(0x83, 0xC0, 0x01); /* add eax, 1 */
- EMIT2_off32(0x89, 0x85, 36); /* mov dword ptr [rbp + 36], eax */
+ EMIT2_off32(0x89, 0x85, -36 - MAX_BPF_STACK); /* mov dword ptr [rbp -548], eax */
/* prog = array->ptrs[index]; */
EMIT4_off32(0x48, 0x8B, 0x84, 0xD6, /* mov rax, [rsi + rdx * 8 + offsetof(...)] */
@@ -1040,19 +1013,14 @@ xadd: if (is_imm8(insn->off))
seen_exit = true;
/* Update cleanup_addr */
ctx->cleanup_addr = proglen;
- /* mov rbx, qword ptr [rbp+0] */
- EMIT4(0x48, 0x8B, 0x5D, 0);
- /* mov r13, qword ptr [rbp+8] */
- EMIT4(0x4C, 0x8B, 0x6D, 8);
- /* mov r14, qword ptr [rbp+16] */
- EMIT4(0x4C, 0x8B, 0x75, 16);
- /* mov r15, qword ptr [rbp+24] */
- EMIT4(0x4C, 0x8B, 0x7D, 24);
-
- /* add rbp, AUX_STACK_SPACE */
- EMIT4(0x48, 0x83, 0xC5, AUX_STACK_SPACE);
- EMIT1(0xC9); /* leave */
- EMIT1(0xC3); /* ret */
+ if (!bpf_prog_was_classic(bpf_prog))
+ EMIT1(0x5B); /* get rid of tail_call_cnt */
+ EMIT2(0x41, 0x5F); /* pop r15 */
+ EMIT2(0x41, 0x5E); /* pop r14 */
+ EMIT2(0x41, 0x5D); /* pop r13 */
+ EMIT1(0x5B); /* pop rbx */
+ EMIT1(0xC9); /* leave */
+ EMIT1(0xC3); /* ret */
break;
default:
--
2.20.0
On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 4:10 PM Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Since commit 177366bf7ceb the %rbp stopped pointing to %rbp of the
> previous stack frame. That broke frame pointer based stack unwinding.
> This commit is a partial revert of it.
> Note that the location of tail_call_cnt is fixed, since the verifier
> enforces MAX_BPF_STACK stack size for programs with tail calls.
>
> Fixes: 177366bf7ceb ("bpf: change x86 JITed program stack layout")
> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
Applied to bpf tree.