2021-01-13 05:40:56

by Gilad Reti

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH bpf v2 1/2] bpf: support PTR_TO_MEM{,_OR_NULL} register spilling

Add support for pointer to mem register spilling, to allow the verifier
to track pointers to valid memory addresses. Such pointers are returned
for example by a successful call of the bpf_ringbuf_reserve helper.

The patch was partially contributed by CyberArk Software, Inc.

Fixes: 457f44363a88 ("bpf: Implement BPF ring buffer and verifier support for it")
Suggested-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Gilad Reti <[email protected]>
---
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 17270b8404f1..36af69fac591 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -2217,6 +2217,8 @@ static bool is_spillable_regtype(enum bpf_reg_type type)
case PTR_TO_RDWR_BUF:
case PTR_TO_RDWR_BUF_OR_NULL:
case PTR_TO_PERCPU_BTF_ID:
+ case PTR_TO_MEM:
+ case PTR_TO_MEM_OR_NULL:
return true;
default:
return false;
--
2.27.0


2021-01-13 05:43:27

by Gilad Reti

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH bpf v2 2/2] selftests/bpf: add verifier test for PTR_TO_MEM spill

Add a test to check that the verifier is able to recognize spilling of
PTR_TO_MEM registers, by reserving a ringbuf buffer, forcing the spill
of a pointer holding the buffer address to the stack, filling it back
in from the stack and writing to the memory area pointed by it.

The patch was partially contributed by CyberArk Software, Inc.

Signed-off-by: Gilad Reti <[email protected]>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 12 +++++++-
.../selftests/bpf/verifier/spill_fill.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
index 777a81404fdb..f8569f04064b 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@
#define MAX_INSNS BPF_MAXINSNS
#define MAX_TEST_INSNS 1000000
#define MAX_FIXUPS 8
-#define MAX_NR_MAPS 20
+#define MAX_NR_MAPS 21
#define MAX_TEST_RUNS 8
#define POINTER_VALUE 0xcafe4all
#define TEST_DATA_LEN 64
@@ -87,6 +87,7 @@ struct bpf_test {
int fixup_sk_storage_map[MAX_FIXUPS];
int fixup_map_event_output[MAX_FIXUPS];
int fixup_map_reuseport_array[MAX_FIXUPS];
+ int fixup_map_ringbuf[MAX_FIXUPS];
const char *errstr;
const char *errstr_unpriv;
uint32_t insn_processed;
@@ -640,6 +641,7 @@ static void do_test_fixup(struct bpf_test *test, enum bpf_prog_type prog_type,
int *fixup_sk_storage_map = test->fixup_sk_storage_map;
int *fixup_map_event_output = test->fixup_map_event_output;
int *fixup_map_reuseport_array = test->fixup_map_reuseport_array;
+ int *fixup_map_ringbuf = test->fixup_map_ringbuf;

if (test->fill_helper) {
test->fill_insns = calloc(MAX_TEST_INSNS, sizeof(struct bpf_insn));
@@ -817,6 +819,14 @@ static void do_test_fixup(struct bpf_test *test, enum bpf_prog_type prog_type,
fixup_map_reuseport_array++;
} while (*fixup_map_reuseport_array);
}
+ if (*fixup_map_ringbuf) {
+ map_fds[20] = create_map(BPF_MAP_TYPE_RINGBUF, 0,
+ 0, 4096);
+ do {
+ prog[*fixup_map_ringbuf].imm = map_fds[20];
+ fixup_map_ringbuf++;
+ } while (*fixup_map_ringbuf);
+ }
}

struct libcap {
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/spill_fill.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/spill_fill.c
index 45d43bf82f26..0b943897aaf6 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/spill_fill.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/spill_fill.c
@@ -28,6 +28,36 @@
.result = ACCEPT,
.result_unpriv = ACCEPT,
},
+{
+ "check valid spill/fill, ptr to mem",
+ .insns = {
+ /* reserve 8 byte ringbuf memory */
+ BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
+ BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 8),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 0),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_ringbuf_reserve),
+ /* store a pointer to the reserved memory in R6 */
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_0),
+ /* check whether the reservation was successful */
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 6),
+ /* spill R6(mem) into the stack */
+ BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, BPF_REG_6, -8),
+ /* fill it back in R7 */
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_10, -8),
+ /* should be able to access *(R7) = 0 */
+ BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_7, 0, 0),
+ /* submit the reserved ringbuf memory */
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_7),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 0),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_ringbuf_submit),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .fixup_map_ringbuf = { 1 },
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .result_unpriv = ACCEPT,
+},
{
"check corrupted spill/fill",
.insns = {
--
2.27.0

2021-01-13 16:08:59

by Yonghong Song

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf v2 2/2] selftests/bpf: add verifier test for PTR_TO_MEM spill



On 1/12/21 9:38 PM, Gilad Reti wrote:
> Add a test to check that the verifier is able to recognize spilling of
> PTR_TO_MEM registers, by reserving a ringbuf buffer, forcing the spill
> of a pointer holding the buffer address to the stack, filling it back
> in from the stack and writing to the memory area pointed by it.
>
> The patch was partially contributed by CyberArk Software, Inc.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gilad Reti <[email protected]>

I didn't verify result_unpriv = ACCEPT part. I think it is correct
by checking code.

Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>

2021-01-14 02:07:07

by KP Singh

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf v2 2/2] selftests/bpf: add verifier test for PTR_TO_MEM spill

On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 5:05 PM Yonghong Song <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 1/12/21 9:38 PM, Gilad Reti wrote:
> > Add a test to check that the verifier is able to recognize spilling of
> > PTR_TO_MEM registers, by reserving a ringbuf buffer, forcing the spill
> > of a pointer holding the buffer address to the stack, filling it back
> > in from the stack and writing to the memory area pointed by it.
> >
> > The patch was partially contributed by CyberArk Software, Inc.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Gilad Reti <[email protected]>
>
> I didn't verify result_unpriv = ACCEPT part. I think it is correct
> by checking code.
>
> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>

Thanks for the description!

Acked-by: KP Singh <[email protected]>

2021-01-14 02:08:35

by KP Singh

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf v2 1/2] bpf: support PTR_TO_MEM{,_OR_NULL} register spilling

On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 6:38 AM Gilad Reti <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Add support for pointer to mem register spilling, to allow the verifier
> to track pointers to valid memory addresses. Such pointers are returned
> for example by a successful call of the bpf_ringbuf_reserve helper.
>
> The patch was partially contributed by CyberArk Software, Inc.
>
> Fixes: 457f44363a88 ("bpf: Implement BPF ring buffer and verifier support for it")
> Suggested-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Gilad Reti <[email protected]>

Acked-by: KP Singh <[email protected]>

2021-01-14 04:05:09

by Alexei Starovoitov

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf v2 1/2] bpf: support PTR_TO_MEM{,_OR_NULL} register spilling

On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 2:29 PM KP Singh <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 6:38 AM Gilad Reti <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Add support for pointer to mem register spilling, to allow the verifier
> > to track pointers to valid memory addresses. Such pointers are returned
> > for example by a successful call of the bpf_ringbuf_reserve helper.
> >
> > The patch was partially contributed by CyberArk Software, Inc.
> >
> > Fixes: 457f44363a88 ("bpf: Implement BPF ring buffer and verifier support for it")
> > Suggested-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
> > Signed-off-by: Gilad Reti <[email protected]>
>
> Acked-by: KP Singh <[email protected]>

It's a border line feature vs fix.
Since the patch is trivial and it addresses a real problem I've
applied to the bpf tree.
Thanks!