2024-02-04 13:50:00

by Masahiro Yamada

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] loongarch: select HAVE_ARCH_SECCOMP to use the common SECCOMP menu

LoongArch missed the refactoring made by commit 282a181b1a0d ("seccomp:
Move config option SECCOMP to arch/Kconfig") because LoongArch was not
mainlined at that time.

The 'depends on PROC_FS' statement is stale as described in that commit.
Select HAVE_ARCH_SECCOMP, and remove the duplicated config entry.

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <[email protected]>
---

arch/loongarch/Kconfig | 18 +-----------------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/loongarch/Kconfig b/arch/loongarch/Kconfig
index 64e9a01c7f36..929f68926b34 100644
--- a/arch/loongarch/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/loongarch/Kconfig
@@ -100,6 +100,7 @@ config LOONGARCH
select HAVE_ARCH_KFENCE
select HAVE_ARCH_KGDB if PERF_EVENTS
select HAVE_ARCH_MMAP_RND_BITS if MMU
+ select HAVE_ARCH_SECCOMP
select HAVE_ARCH_SECCOMP_FILTER
select HAVE_ARCH_TRACEHOOK
select HAVE_ARCH_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
@@ -633,23 +634,6 @@ config RANDOMIZE_BASE_MAX_OFFSET

This is limited by the size of the lower address memory, 256MB.

-config SECCOMP
- bool "Enable seccomp to safely compute untrusted bytecode"
- depends on PROC_FS
- default y
- help
- This kernel feature is useful for number crunching applications
- that may need to compute untrusted bytecode during their
- execution. By using pipes or other transports made available to
- the process as file descriptors supporting the read/write
- syscalls, it's possible to isolate those applications in
- their own address space using seccomp. Once seccomp is
- enabled via /proc/<pid>/seccomp, it cannot be disabled
- and the task is only allowed to execute a few safe syscalls
- defined by each seccomp mode.
-
- If unsure, say Y. Only embedded should say N here.
-
endmenu

config ARCH_SELECT_MEMORY_MODEL
--
2.40.1



2024-02-06 04:05:52

by Huacai Chen

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] loongarch: select HAVE_ARCH_SECCOMP to use the common SECCOMP menu

Queued, thanks.

Huacai

On Sun, Feb 4, 2024 at 9:49 PM Masahiro Yamada <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> LoongArch missed the refactoring made by commit 282a181b1a0d ("seccomp:
> Move config option SECCOMP to arch/Kconfig") because LoongArch was not
> mainlined at that time.
>
> The 'depends on PROC_FS' statement is stale as described in that commit.
> Select HAVE_ARCH_SECCOMP, and remove the duplicated config entry.
>
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <[email protected]>
> ---
>
> arch/loongarch/Kconfig | 18 +-----------------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/Kconfig b/arch/loongarch/Kconfig
> index 64e9a01c7f36..929f68926b34 100644
> --- a/arch/loongarch/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/loongarch/Kconfig
> @@ -100,6 +100,7 @@ config LOONGARCH
> select HAVE_ARCH_KFENCE
> select HAVE_ARCH_KGDB if PERF_EVENTS
> select HAVE_ARCH_MMAP_RND_BITS if MMU
> + select HAVE_ARCH_SECCOMP
> select HAVE_ARCH_SECCOMP_FILTER
> select HAVE_ARCH_TRACEHOOK
> select HAVE_ARCH_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
> @@ -633,23 +634,6 @@ config RANDOMIZE_BASE_MAX_OFFSET
>
> This is limited by the size of the lower address memory, 256MB.
>
> -config SECCOMP
> - bool "Enable seccomp to safely compute untrusted bytecode"
> - depends on PROC_FS
> - default y
> - help
> - This kernel feature is useful for number crunching applications
> - that may need to compute untrusted bytecode during their
> - execution. By using pipes or other transports made available to
> - the process as file descriptors supporting the read/write
> - syscalls, it's possible to isolate those applications in
> - their own address space using seccomp. Once seccomp is
> - enabled via /proc/<pid>/seccomp, it cannot be disabled
> - and the task is only allowed to execute a few safe syscalls
> - defined by each seccomp mode.
> -
> - If unsure, say Y. Only embedded should say N here.
> -
> endmenu
>
> config ARCH_SELECT_MEMORY_MODEL
> --
> 2.40.1
>