2023-10-12 22:18:55

by Stephen Rothwell

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: linux-next: duplicate patch in the pinctrl tree

Hi all,

The following commit is also in Linus Torvalds' tree as a different commit
(but the same patch):

73394a1b2194 ("pinctrl: renesas: rzn1: Enable missing PINMUX")

This is commit

f055ff23c331 ("pinctrl: renesas: rzn1: Enable missing PINMUX")

in Linus' tree.

--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell


Attachments:
(No filename) (499.00 B)
OpenPGP digital signature

2023-10-12 22:45:17

by Linus Walleij

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the pinctrl tree

On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 12:18 AM Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote:

> The following commit is also in Linus Torvalds' tree as a different commit
> (but the same patch):
>
> 73394a1b2194 ("pinctrl: renesas: rzn1: Enable missing PINMUX")
>
> This is commit
>
> f055ff23c331 ("pinctrl: renesas: rzn1: Enable missing PINMUX")
>
> in Linus' tree.

I had to fix up the commit message, sorry, I'll rebuild my branch for -next.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

2023-10-13 07:11:19

by Geert Uytterhoeven

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the pinctrl tree

Hi Linus,

On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 12:44 AM Linus Walleij <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 12:18 AM Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote:
> > The following commit is also in Linus Torvalds' tree as a different commit
> > (but the same patch):
> >
> > 73394a1b2194 ("pinctrl: renesas: rzn1: Enable missing PINMUX")
> >
> > This is commit
> >
> > f055ff23c331 ("pinctrl: renesas: rzn1: Enable missing PINMUX")
> >
> > in Linus' tree.
>
> I had to fix up the commit message, sorry,

The only difference is your added SoB?

> I'll rebuild my branch for -next.

I'm afraid that won't help, as the original one (from
renesas-pinctrl-fixes-for-v6.6) is also part of
renesas-pinctrl-for-v6.7, which I'm gonna send you a PR for later today.

I guess we'll just have to live with it?

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [email protected]

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds

2023-10-13 07:14:59

by Linus Walleij

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the pinctrl tree

On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 9:10 AM Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 12:44 AM Linus Walleij <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 12:18 AM Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > The following commit is also in Linus Torvalds' tree as a different commit
> > > (but the same patch):
> > >
> > > 73394a1b2194 ("pinctrl: renesas: rzn1: Enable missing PINMUX")
> > >
> > > This is commit
> > >
> > > f055ff23c331 ("pinctrl: renesas: rzn1: Enable missing PINMUX")
> > >
> > > in Linus' tree.
> >
> > I had to fix up the commit message, sorry,
>
> The only difference is your added SoB?

No, I'm not that vain...

The merge commit got screwed up (random characters I don't know why).

So since it's just one patch I simply rebased the one patch to the top.

But if I do that, the tools will complain about "non-author signoff".
So I had to sign it off.

> > I'll rebuild my branch for -next.
>
> I'm afraid that won't help, as the original one (from
> renesas-pinctrl-fixes-for-v6.6) is also part of
> renesas-pinctrl-for-v6.7, which I'm gonna send you a PR for later today.
>
> I guess we'll just have to live with it?

It's fine if you drop it and rebase from my side, I understand the
hashes will be different but the content is the same so it is the
same tested.

But I guess there could be reasons for not to, so then we can
live with it I guess.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

2023-10-13 07:37:55

by Geert Uytterhoeven

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the pinctrl tree

Hi Linus,

On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 9:14 AM Linus Walleij <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 9:10 AM Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 12:44 AM Linus Walleij <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 12:18 AM Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > The following commit is also in Linus Torvalds' tree as a different commit
> > > > (but the same patch):
> > > >
> > > > 73394a1b2194 ("pinctrl: renesas: rzn1: Enable missing PINMUX")
> > > >
> > > > This is commit
> > > >
> > > > f055ff23c331 ("pinctrl: renesas: rzn1: Enable missing PINMUX")
> > > >
> > > > in Linus' tree.
> > >
> > > I had to fix up the commit message, sorry,
> >
> > The only difference is your added SoB?
>
> No, I'm not that vain...

I don't see any other difference, though:

$ git help diff-commits
'diff-commits' is aliased to '!bash -c "colordiff -up <(git show $1)
<(git show $2) | less -R" #'
$ git diff-commits 73394a1b2194 f055ff23c331
--- /dev/fd/63 2023-10-13 09:30:50.809415961 +0200
+++ /dev/fd/62 2023-10-13 09:30:50.809415961 +0200
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-commit 73394a1b2194694b66f7a0839a219ce0d16b64a3
+commit f055ff23c331f28aa4ace4b72dc56f63b9a726c8
Author: Ralph Siemsen <[email protected]>
Date: Wed Oct 4 16:00:08 2023 -0400

@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ Date: Wed Oct 4 16:00:08 2023 -0400
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
+ Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/renesas/Kconfig b/drivers/pinctrl/renesas/Kconfig
index 77730dc548ed3c70..c8d519ca53eb7f31 100644

> > > I'll rebuild my branch for -next.
> >
> > I'm afraid that won't help, as the original one (from
> > renesas-pinctrl-fixes-for-v6.6) is also part of
> > renesas-pinctrl-for-v6.7, which I'm gonna send you a PR for later today.
> >
> > I guess we'll just have to live with it?
>
> It's fine if you drop it and rebase from my side, I understand the
> hashes will be different but the content is the same so it is the
> same tested.
>
> But I guess there could be reasons for not to, so then we can
> live with it I guess.

OK, I'll drop it from renesas-pinctrl-for-v6.7. I don't have any other
changes touching the same file.

Thanks!

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [email protected]

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds

2023-10-13 09:01:30

by Linus Walleij

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the pinctrl tree

On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 9:37 AM Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]> wrote:


> > > The only difference is your added SoB?
> >
> > No, I'm not that vain...
>
> I don't see any other difference, though:

The difference is not in the commit, the difference is that the merge
commit is not
there, so it is a commit on top of my pile instead of v6.6-rc.

Yours,
Linus Walleij