2022-07-07 01:53:27

by Christian Marangi

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] hwspinlock: qcom: Add support for mmio usage to sfpb-mutex

Allow sfpb-mutex to use mmio in addition to syscon.

Signed-off-by: Christian Marangi <[email protected]>
---
drivers/hwspinlock/qcom_hwspinlock.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/hwspinlock/qcom_hwspinlock.c b/drivers/hwspinlock/qcom_hwspinlock.c
index 364710966665..23c913095bd0 100644
--- a/drivers/hwspinlock/qcom_hwspinlock.c
+++ b/drivers/hwspinlock/qcom_hwspinlock.c
@@ -19,6 +19,11 @@
#define QCOM_MUTEX_APPS_PROC_ID 1
#define QCOM_MUTEX_NUM_LOCKS 32

+struct qcom_hwspinlock_of_data {
+ u32 offset;
+ u32 stride;
+};
+
static int qcom_hwspinlock_trylock(struct hwspinlock *lock)
{
struct regmap_field *field = lock->priv;
@@ -63,9 +68,20 @@ static const struct hwspinlock_ops qcom_hwspinlock_ops = {
.unlock = qcom_hwspinlock_unlock,
};

+static const struct qcom_hwspinlock_of_data of_sfpb_mutex = {
+ .offset = 0x4,
+ .stride = 0x4,
+};
+
+/* All modern platform has offset 0 and stride of 4k */
+static const struct qcom_hwspinlock_of_data of_tcsr_mutex = {
+ .offset = 0,
+ .stride = 0x1000,
+};
+
static const struct of_device_id qcom_hwspinlock_of_match[] = {
- { .compatible = "qcom,sfpb-mutex" },
- { .compatible = "qcom,tcsr-mutex" },
+ { .compatible = "qcom,sfpb-mutex", .data = &of_sfpb_mutex },
+ { .compatible = "qcom,tcsr-mutex", .data = &of_tcsr_mutex },
{ }
};
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, qcom_hwspinlock_of_match);
@@ -101,7 +117,7 @@ static struct regmap *qcom_hwspinlock_probe_syscon(struct platform_device *pdev,
return regmap;
}

-static const struct regmap_config tcsr_mutex_config = {
+static const struct regmap_config qcom_hwspinlock_mmio_config = {
.reg_bits = 32,
.reg_stride = 4,
.val_bits = 32,
@@ -112,18 +128,20 @@ static const struct regmap_config tcsr_mutex_config = {
static struct regmap *qcom_hwspinlock_probe_mmio(struct platform_device *pdev,
u32 *offset, u32 *stride)
{
+ const struct qcom_hwspinlock_of_data *data;
struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
void __iomem *base;

- /* All modern platform has offset 0 and stride of 4k */
- *offset = 0;
- *stride = 0x1000;
+ data = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
+
+ *offset = data->offset;
+ *stride = data->stride;

base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
if (IS_ERR(base))
return ERR_CAST(base);

- return devm_regmap_init_mmio(dev, base, &tcsr_mutex_config);
+ return devm_regmap_init_mmio(dev, base, &qcom_hwspinlock_mmio_config);
}

static int qcom_hwspinlock_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
--
2.36.1


2022-07-07 02:12:51

by Christian Marangi

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: dts: qcom: add missing smem node for ipq8064 dtsi

Add missing smem node for ipq8064 dtsi.

Signed-off-by: Christian Marangi <[email protected]>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-ipq8064.dtsi | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-ipq8064.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-ipq8064.dtsi
index cd1b43e2cab4..ff1a2acb1d83 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-ipq8064.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-ipq8064.dtsi
@@ -292,8 +292,11 @@ nss@40000000 {
};

smem: smem@41000000 {
+ compatible = "qcom,smem";
reg = <0x41000000 0x200000>;
no-map;
+
+ hwlocks = <&sfpb_mutex 3>;
};
};

--
2.36.1

2022-07-07 02:19:22

by Christian Marangi

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] ARM: dts: qcom: add missing hwlock for ipq8064 dtsi

Add missing hwlock for ipq8064 dtsi provided by qcom,sfpb-mutex.

Signed-off-by: Christian Marangi <[email protected]>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-ipq8064.dtsi | 7 +++++++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-ipq8064.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-ipq8064.dtsi
index 4b475d98343c..cd1b43e2cab4 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-ipq8064.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-ipq8064.dtsi
@@ -1224,4 +1224,11 @@ sdcc3: mmc@12180000 {
};
};
};
+
+ sfpb_mutex: hwlock@1200600 {
+ compatible = "qcom,sfpb-mutex";
+ reg = <0x01200600 0x100>;
+
+ #hwlock-cells = <1>;
+ };
};
--
2.36.1

2022-07-07 03:46:37

by Bjorn Andersson

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] hwspinlock: qcom: Add support for mmio usage to sfpb-mutex

On Wed 06 Jul 20:30 CDT 2022, Christian Marangi wrote:

> Allow sfpb-mutex to use mmio in addition to syscon.
>

Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <[email protected]>

> Signed-off-by: Christian Marangi <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/hwspinlock/qcom_hwspinlock.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hwspinlock/qcom_hwspinlock.c b/drivers/hwspinlock/qcom_hwspinlock.c
> index 364710966665..23c913095bd0 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwspinlock/qcom_hwspinlock.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwspinlock/qcom_hwspinlock.c
> @@ -19,6 +19,11 @@
> #define QCOM_MUTEX_APPS_PROC_ID 1
> #define QCOM_MUTEX_NUM_LOCKS 32
>
> +struct qcom_hwspinlock_of_data {
> + u32 offset;
> + u32 stride;
> +};
> +
> static int qcom_hwspinlock_trylock(struct hwspinlock *lock)
> {
> struct regmap_field *field = lock->priv;
> @@ -63,9 +68,20 @@ static const struct hwspinlock_ops qcom_hwspinlock_ops = {
> .unlock = qcom_hwspinlock_unlock,
> };
>
> +static const struct qcom_hwspinlock_of_data of_sfpb_mutex = {
> + .offset = 0x4,
> + .stride = 0x4,
> +};
> +
> +/* All modern platform has offset 0 and stride of 4k */
> +static const struct qcom_hwspinlock_of_data of_tcsr_mutex = {
> + .offset = 0,
> + .stride = 0x1000,
> +};
> +
> static const struct of_device_id qcom_hwspinlock_of_match[] = {
> - { .compatible = "qcom,sfpb-mutex" },
> - { .compatible = "qcom,tcsr-mutex" },
> + { .compatible = "qcom,sfpb-mutex", .data = &of_sfpb_mutex },
> + { .compatible = "qcom,tcsr-mutex", .data = &of_tcsr_mutex },
> { }
> };
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, qcom_hwspinlock_of_match);
> @@ -101,7 +117,7 @@ static struct regmap *qcom_hwspinlock_probe_syscon(struct platform_device *pdev,
> return regmap;
> }
>
> -static const struct regmap_config tcsr_mutex_config = {
> +static const struct regmap_config qcom_hwspinlock_mmio_config = {

Any objections against me skipping this rename when applying the patch?
Just to keep the patch to the point?

Regards,
Bjorn

> .reg_bits = 32,
> .reg_stride = 4,
> .val_bits = 32,
> @@ -112,18 +128,20 @@ static const struct regmap_config tcsr_mutex_config = {
> static struct regmap *qcom_hwspinlock_probe_mmio(struct platform_device *pdev,
> u32 *offset, u32 *stride)
> {
> + const struct qcom_hwspinlock_of_data *data;
> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> void __iomem *base;
>
> - /* All modern platform has offset 0 and stride of 4k */
> - *offset = 0;
> - *stride = 0x1000;
> + data = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
> +
> + *offset = data->offset;
> + *stride = data->stride;
>
> base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
> if (IS_ERR(base))
> return ERR_CAST(base);
>
> - return devm_regmap_init_mmio(dev, base, &tcsr_mutex_config);
> + return devm_regmap_init_mmio(dev, base, &qcom_hwspinlock_mmio_config);
> }
>
> static int qcom_hwspinlock_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> --
> 2.36.1
>

2022-07-07 07:01:41

by Krzysztof Kozlowski

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ARM: dts: qcom: add missing hwlock for ipq8064 dtsi

On 07/07/2022 03:30, Christian Marangi wrote:
> Add missing hwlock for ipq8064 dtsi provided by qcom,sfpb-mutex.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian Marangi <[email protected]>


Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]>


Best regards,
Krzysztof

2022-07-07 10:25:02

by Christian Marangi

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] hwspinlock: qcom: Add support for mmio usage to sfpb-mutex

On Wed, Jul 06, 2022 at 09:53:45PM -0500, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Wed 06 Jul 20:30 CDT 2022, Christian Marangi wrote:
>
> > Allow sfpb-mutex to use mmio in addition to syscon.
> >
>
> Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <[email protected]>
>
> > Signed-off-by: Christian Marangi <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > drivers/hwspinlock/qcom_hwspinlock.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++------
> > 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/hwspinlock/qcom_hwspinlock.c b/drivers/hwspinlock/qcom_hwspinlock.c
> > index 364710966665..23c913095bd0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/hwspinlock/qcom_hwspinlock.c
> > +++ b/drivers/hwspinlock/qcom_hwspinlock.c
> > @@ -19,6 +19,11 @@
> > #define QCOM_MUTEX_APPS_PROC_ID 1
> > #define QCOM_MUTEX_NUM_LOCKS 32
> >
> > +struct qcom_hwspinlock_of_data {
> > + u32 offset;
> > + u32 stride;
> > +};
> > +
> > static int qcom_hwspinlock_trylock(struct hwspinlock *lock)
> > {
> > struct regmap_field *field = lock->priv;
> > @@ -63,9 +68,20 @@ static const struct hwspinlock_ops qcom_hwspinlock_ops = {
> > .unlock = qcom_hwspinlock_unlock,
> > };
> >
> > +static const struct qcom_hwspinlock_of_data of_sfpb_mutex = {
> > + .offset = 0x4,
> > + .stride = 0x4,
> > +};
> > +
> > +/* All modern platform has offset 0 and stride of 4k */
> > +static const struct qcom_hwspinlock_of_data of_tcsr_mutex = {
> > + .offset = 0,
> > + .stride = 0x1000,
> > +};
> > +
> > static const struct of_device_id qcom_hwspinlock_of_match[] = {
> > - { .compatible = "qcom,sfpb-mutex" },
> > - { .compatible = "qcom,tcsr-mutex" },
> > + { .compatible = "qcom,sfpb-mutex", .data = &of_sfpb_mutex },
> > + { .compatible = "qcom,tcsr-mutex", .data = &of_tcsr_mutex },
> > { }
> > };
> > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, qcom_hwspinlock_of_match);
> > @@ -101,7 +117,7 @@ static struct regmap *qcom_hwspinlock_probe_syscon(struct platform_device *pdev,
> > return regmap;
> > }
> >
> > -static const struct regmap_config tcsr_mutex_config = {
> > +static const struct regmap_config qcom_hwspinlock_mmio_config = {
>
> Any objections against me skipping this rename when applying the patch?
> Just to keep the patch to the point?
>
> Regards,
> Bjorn
>

I will send v2 with the name reverted and another fix.

> > .reg_bits = 32,
> > .reg_stride = 4,
> > .val_bits = 32,
> > @@ -112,18 +128,20 @@ static const struct regmap_config tcsr_mutex_config = {
> > static struct regmap *qcom_hwspinlock_probe_mmio(struct platform_device *pdev,
> > u32 *offset, u32 *stride)
> > {
> > + const struct qcom_hwspinlock_of_data *data;
> > struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > void __iomem *base;
> >
> > - /* All modern platform has offset 0 and stride of 4k */
> > - *offset = 0;
> > - *stride = 0x1000;
> > + data = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
> > +
> > + *offset = data->offset;
> > + *stride = data->stride;
> >
> > base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
> > if (IS_ERR(base))
> > return ERR_CAST(base);
> >
> > - return devm_regmap_init_mmio(dev, base, &tcsr_mutex_config);
> > + return devm_regmap_init_mmio(dev, base, &qcom_hwspinlock_mmio_config);
> > }
> >
> > static int qcom_hwspinlock_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > --
> > 2.36.1
> >

--
Ansuel

2022-07-07 11:32:58

by Christian Marangi

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] hwspinlock: qcom: Add support for mmio usage to sfpb-mutex

On Thu, Jul 07, 2022 at 07:00:15PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 9:30 AM Christian Marangi <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Allow sfpb-mutex to use mmio in addition to syscon.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Christian Marangi <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > drivers/hwspinlock/qcom_hwspinlock.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++------
> > 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/hwspinlock/qcom_hwspinlock.c b/drivers/hwspinlock/qcom_hwspinlock.c
> > index 364710966665..23c913095bd0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/hwspinlock/qcom_hwspinlock.c
> > +++ b/drivers/hwspinlock/qcom_hwspinlock.c
> > @@ -19,6 +19,11 @@
> > #define QCOM_MUTEX_APPS_PROC_ID 1
> > #define QCOM_MUTEX_NUM_LOCKS 32
> >
> > +struct qcom_hwspinlock_of_data {
> > + u32 offset;
> > + u32 stride;
> > +};
> > +
> > static int qcom_hwspinlock_trylock(struct hwspinlock *lock)
> > {
> > struct regmap_field *field = lock->priv;
> > @@ -63,9 +68,20 @@ static const struct hwspinlock_ops qcom_hwspinlock_ops = {
> > .unlock = qcom_hwspinlock_unlock,
> > };
> >
> > +static const struct qcom_hwspinlock_of_data of_sfpb_mutex = {
> > + .offset = 0x4,
> > + .stride = 0x4,
> > +};
> > +
> > +/* All modern platform has offset 0 and stride of 4k */
> > +static const struct qcom_hwspinlock_of_data of_tcsr_mutex = {
> > + .offset = 0,
> > + .stride = 0x1000,
> > +};
> > +
> > static const struct of_device_id qcom_hwspinlock_of_match[] = {
> > - { .compatible = "qcom,sfpb-mutex" },
> > - { .compatible = "qcom,tcsr-mutex" },
> > + { .compatible = "qcom,sfpb-mutex", .data = &of_sfpb_mutex },
> > + { .compatible = "qcom,tcsr-mutex", .data = &of_tcsr_mutex },
> > { }
> > };
> > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, qcom_hwspinlock_of_match);
> > @@ -101,7 +117,7 @@ static struct regmap *qcom_hwspinlock_probe_syscon(struct platform_device *pdev,
> > return regmap;
> > }
> >
> > -static const struct regmap_config tcsr_mutex_config = {
> > +static const struct regmap_config qcom_hwspinlock_mmio_config = {
> > .reg_bits = 32,
> > .reg_stride = 4,
> > .val_bits = 32,
> > @@ -112,18 +128,20 @@ static const struct regmap_config tcsr_mutex_config = {
> > static struct regmap *qcom_hwspinlock_probe_mmio(struct platform_device *pdev,
> > u32 *offset, u32 *stride)
> > {
> > + const struct qcom_hwspinlock_of_data *data;
> > struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > void __iomem *base;
> >
> > - /* All modern platform has offset 0 and stride of 4k */
> > - *offset = 0;
> > - *stride = 0x1000;
> > + data = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
>
> Nit: better to validate the return value though this is a rare case.
>
> if (!data)
> return -ENODEV;
>

Wonder if that can actually happen?

Looking at of_device_get_match_data() it can only return the data or
NULL if the match data is not defined but considering it should ALWAYS
be defined (or the driver can't work). But yhea should be a value to
check.

--
Ansuel

2022-07-07 11:36:18

by Baolin Wang

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] hwspinlock: qcom: Add support for mmio usage to sfpb-mutex

On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 9:30 AM Christian Marangi <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Allow sfpb-mutex to use mmio in addition to syscon.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian Marangi <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/hwspinlock/qcom_hwspinlock.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hwspinlock/qcom_hwspinlock.c b/drivers/hwspinlock/qcom_hwspinlock.c
> index 364710966665..23c913095bd0 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwspinlock/qcom_hwspinlock.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwspinlock/qcom_hwspinlock.c
> @@ -19,6 +19,11 @@
> #define QCOM_MUTEX_APPS_PROC_ID 1
> #define QCOM_MUTEX_NUM_LOCKS 32
>
> +struct qcom_hwspinlock_of_data {
> + u32 offset;
> + u32 stride;
> +};
> +
> static int qcom_hwspinlock_trylock(struct hwspinlock *lock)
> {
> struct regmap_field *field = lock->priv;
> @@ -63,9 +68,20 @@ static const struct hwspinlock_ops qcom_hwspinlock_ops = {
> .unlock = qcom_hwspinlock_unlock,
> };
>
> +static const struct qcom_hwspinlock_of_data of_sfpb_mutex = {
> + .offset = 0x4,
> + .stride = 0x4,
> +};
> +
> +/* All modern platform has offset 0 and stride of 4k */
> +static const struct qcom_hwspinlock_of_data of_tcsr_mutex = {
> + .offset = 0,
> + .stride = 0x1000,
> +};
> +
> static const struct of_device_id qcom_hwspinlock_of_match[] = {
> - { .compatible = "qcom,sfpb-mutex" },
> - { .compatible = "qcom,tcsr-mutex" },
> + { .compatible = "qcom,sfpb-mutex", .data = &of_sfpb_mutex },
> + { .compatible = "qcom,tcsr-mutex", .data = &of_tcsr_mutex },
> { }
> };
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, qcom_hwspinlock_of_match);
> @@ -101,7 +117,7 @@ static struct regmap *qcom_hwspinlock_probe_syscon(struct platform_device *pdev,
> return regmap;
> }
>
> -static const struct regmap_config tcsr_mutex_config = {
> +static const struct regmap_config qcom_hwspinlock_mmio_config = {
> .reg_bits = 32,
> .reg_stride = 4,
> .val_bits = 32,
> @@ -112,18 +128,20 @@ static const struct regmap_config tcsr_mutex_config = {
> static struct regmap *qcom_hwspinlock_probe_mmio(struct platform_device *pdev,
> u32 *offset, u32 *stride)
> {
> + const struct qcom_hwspinlock_of_data *data;
> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> void __iomem *base;
>
> - /* All modern platform has offset 0 and stride of 4k */
> - *offset = 0;
> - *stride = 0x1000;
> + data = of_device_get_match_data(dev);

Nit: better to validate the return value though this is a rare case.

if (!data)
return -ENODEV;

Otherwise LGTM.

Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang <[email protected]>

--
Baolin Wang