2022-12-29 14:52:34

by Krzysztof Kozlowski

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] dt-bindings: net: marvell,orion-mdio: Fix examples

On 29/12/2022 15:22, Michał Grzelak wrote:
> As stated in marvell-orion-mdio.txt deleted in commit 0781434af811f
> ("dt-bindings: net: orion-mdio: Convert to JSON schema") if
> 'interrupts' property is present, width of 'reg' should be 0x84.
> Otherwise, width of 'reg' should be 0x4. Fix 'examples:' and add
> constraints checking whether 'interrupts' property is present
> and validate it against fixed values in reg.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michał Grzelak <[email protected]>

This is a friendly reminder during the review process.

It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it.

If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation:
Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new
versions. However, there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the
tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for acks received on the
version they apply.

https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.17/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L540

If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.

Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]>

Best regards,
Krzysztof


2022-12-29 15:34:25

by Michał Grzelak

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] dt-bindings: net: marvell,orion-mdio: Fix examples

Hi Krzysztof,

On Thu, Dec 29, 2022 at 3:30 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 29/12/2022 15:22, Michał Grzelak wrote:
> > As stated in marvell-orion-mdio.txt deleted in commit 0781434af811f
> > ("dt-bindings: net: orion-mdio: Convert to JSON schema") if
> > 'interrupts' property is present, width of 'reg' should be 0x84.
> > Otherwise, width of 'reg' should be 0x4. Fix 'examples:' and add
> > constraints checking whether 'interrupts' property is present
> > and validate it against fixed values in reg.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Michał Grzelak <[email protected]>
>
> This is a friendly reminder during the review process.
>
> It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it.
>
> If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation:
> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new
> versions. However, there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the
> tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for acks received on the
> version they apply.
>
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.17/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L540
>
> If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.

Deletion of tag wasn't on purpose, it was done by accident. Would you
like me to resend the patch with it being added, or leave it as is?

Best regards,
Michał

2022-12-29 15:35:39

by Krzysztof Kozlowski

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] dt-bindings: net: marvell,orion-mdio: Fix examples

On 29/12/2022 15:51, Michał Grzelak wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
>
> On Thu, Dec 29, 2022 at 3:30 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> On 29/12/2022 15:22, Michał Grzelak wrote:
>>> As stated in marvell-orion-mdio.txt deleted in commit 0781434af811f
>>> ("dt-bindings: net: orion-mdio: Convert to JSON schema") if
>>> 'interrupts' property is present, width of 'reg' should be 0x84.
>>> Otherwise, width of 'reg' should be 0x4. Fix 'examples:' and add
>>> constraints checking whether 'interrupts' property is present
>>> and validate it against fixed values in reg.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Michał Grzelak <[email protected]>
>>
>> This is a friendly reminder during the review process.
>>
>> It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it.
>>
>> If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation:
>> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new
>> versions. However, there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the
>> tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for acks received on the
>> version they apply.
>>
>> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.17/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L540
>>
>> If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
>
> Deletion of tag wasn't on purpose, it was done by accident. Would you
> like me to resend the patch with it being added, or leave it as is?

No need, I added it here, so will be picked-up by maintainers.

Best regards,
Krzysztof