The first parameter passed to container_of() is the pointer to the work
structure passed to the worker and never NULL. The NULL check on the
result of container_of() is therefore unnecessary and misleading.
Remove it.
This change was made automatically with the following Coccinelle script.
@@
type t;
identifier v;
statement s;
@@
<+...
(
t v = container_of(...);
|
v = container_of(...);
)
...
when != v
- if (\( !v \| v == NULL \) ) s
...+>
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <[email protected]>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c
index 5b6c5669c03d..2f8d352e0069 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c
@@ -110,8 +110,6 @@ static void kfd_sdma_activity_worker(struct work_struct *work)
workarea = container_of(work, struct kfd_sdma_activity_handler_workarea,
sdma_activity_work);
- if (!workarea)
- return;
pdd = workarea->pdd;
if (!pdd)
--
2.25.1
Applied. Thanks!
Alex
On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 11:02 AM Guenter Roeck <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> The first parameter passed to container_of() is the pointer to the work
> structure passed to the worker and never NULL. The NULL check on the
> result of container_of() is therefore unnecessary and misleading.
> Remove it.
>
> This change was made automatically with the following Coccinelle script.
>
> @@
> type t;
> identifier v;
> statement s;
> @@
>
> <+...
> (
> t v = container_of(...);
> |
> v = container_of(...);
> )
> ...
> when != v
> - if (\( !v \| v == NULL \) ) s
> ...+>
>
> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c
> index 5b6c5669c03d..2f8d352e0069 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c
> @@ -110,8 +110,6 @@ static void kfd_sdma_activity_worker(struct work_struct *work)
>
> workarea = container_of(work, struct kfd_sdma_activity_handler_workarea,
> sdma_activity_work);
> - if (!workarea)
> - return;
>
> pdd = workarea->pdd;
> if (!pdd)
> --
> 2.25.1
>
Am 2021-05-21 um 11:02 a.m. schrieb Guenter Roeck:
> The first parameter passed to container_of() is the pointer to the work
> structure passed to the worker and never NULL. The NULL check on the
> result of container_of() is therefore unnecessary and misleading.
> Remove it.
>
> This change was made automatically with the following Coccinelle script.
>
> @@
> type t;
> identifier v;
> statement s;
> @@
>
> <+...
> (
> t v = container_of(...);
> |
> v = container_of(...);
> )
> ...
> when != v
> - if (\( !v \| v == NULL \) ) s
> ...+>
>
> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <[email protected]>
Thank you. The patch looks good to me. I caught a few such pointless
checks in code review but must have missed this one. I'll apply your
patch to amd-staging-drm-next. The patch is
Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c
> index 5b6c5669c03d..2f8d352e0069 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c
> @@ -110,8 +110,6 @@ static void kfd_sdma_activity_worker(struct work_struct *work)
>
> workarea = container_of(work, struct kfd_sdma_activity_handler_workarea,
> sdma_activity_work);
> - if (!workarea)
> - return;
>
> pdd = workarea->pdd;
> if (!pdd)