This patch series fixes all errors and warnings generated by
checkpatch.pl for wifi_regd.c.
Fabian Wolff (7):
staging: rtl8723bs: wifi_regd.c: put spaces around binary operators
staging: rtl8723bs: wifi_regd.c: fix checkpatch.pl warning 'Statements
should start on a tabstop'
staging: rtl8723bs: wifi_regd.c: fix comment formatting
staging: rtl8723bs: wifi_regd.c: remove superfluous braces
staging: rtl8723bs: wifi_regd.c: remove superfluous spaces from
pointer arguments
staging: rtl8723bs: wifi_regd.c: adjust alignment to match open
parenthesis
staging: rtl8723bs: wifi_regd.c: insert blank line after declarations
drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/wifi_regd.c | 50 ++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
--
2.7.4
This patch adds spaces around the binary operators '-' and '+', which
is the preferred style, and reformats a pointer argument declaration
to fix a false positive "spaces preferred around that '*'" message
reported by checkpatch.pl.
Signed-off-by: Fabian Wolff <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mate Horvath <[email protected]>
---
drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/wifi_regd.c | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/wifi_regd.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/wifi_regd.c
index 9c61125..803eab0 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/wifi_regd.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/wifi_regd.c
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
/* 2G chan 01 - chan 11 */
#define RTW_2GHZ_CH01_11 \
- REG_RULE(2412-10, 2462+10, 40, 0, 20, 0)
+ REG_RULE(2412 - 10, 2462 + 10, 40, 0, 20, 0)
/*
*We enable active scan on these a case
@@ -29,12 +29,12 @@
/* 2G chan 12 - chan 13, PASSIV SCAN */
#define RTW_2GHZ_CH12_13 \
- REG_RULE(2467-10, 2472+10, 40, 0, 20, \
+ REG_RULE(2467 - 10, 2472 + 10, 40, 0, 20, \
NL80211_RRF_PASSIVE_SCAN)
/* 2G chan 14, PASSIVS SCAN, NO OFDM (B only) */
#define RTW_2GHZ_CH14 \
- REG_RULE(2484-10, 2484+10, 40, 0, 20, \
+ REG_RULE(2484 - 10, 2484 + 10, 40, 0, 20, \
NL80211_RRF_PASSIVE_SCAN | NL80211_RRF_NO_OFDM)
static const struct ieee80211_regdomain rtw_regdom_rd = {
@@ -116,8 +116,8 @@ static int _rtw_reg_notifier_apply(struct wiphy *wiphy,
}
static const struct ieee80211_regdomain *_rtw_regdomain_select(struct
- rtw_regulatory
- *reg)
+ rtw_regulatory *
+ reg)
{
return &rtw_regdom_rd;
}
--
2.7.4
This patch fixes the checkpatch.pl warning 'Statements should start on
a tabstop' by reformatting the affected lines.
Signed-off-by: Fabian Wolff <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mate Horvath <[email protected]>
---
drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/wifi_regd.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/wifi_regd.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/wifi_regd.c
index 803eab0..00c7b0d 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/wifi_regd.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/wifi_regd.c
@@ -41,9 +41,9 @@ static const struct ieee80211_regdomain rtw_regdom_rd = {
.n_reg_rules = 3,
.alpha2 = "99",
.reg_rules = {
- RTW_2GHZ_CH01_11,
- RTW_2GHZ_CH12_13,
- }
+ RTW_2GHZ_CH01_11,
+ RTW_2GHZ_CH12_13,
+ }
};
static int rtw_ieee80211_channel_to_frequency(int chan, int band)
--
2.7.4
This patch inserts a missing blank line after variable declarations.
Signed-off-by: Fabian Wolff <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mate Horvath <[email protected]>
---
drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/wifi_regd.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/wifi_regd.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/wifi_regd.c
index c8945da..0f446e7 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/wifi_regd.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/wifi_regd.c
@@ -148,6 +148,7 @@ int rtw_regd_init(struct adapter *padapter,
struct regulatory_request *request))
{
struct wiphy *wiphy = padapter->rtw_wdev->wiphy;
+
_rtw_regd_init_wiphy(NULL, wiphy, reg_notifier);
return 0;
--
2.7.4
This patch implements the suggestions of checkpatch.pl to remove
unnecessary spaces before function pointer arguments as well as in
statements of the form "foo * bar" (which should be "foo *bar").
Signed-off-by: Fabian Wolff <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mate Horvath <[email protected]>
---
drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/wifi_regd.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/wifi_regd.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/wifi_regd.c
index 5e01846..55d444d 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/wifi_regd.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/wifi_regd.c
@@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ static const struct ieee80211_regdomain *_rtw_regdomain_select(struct
static void _rtw_regd_init_wiphy(struct rtw_regulatory *reg,
struct wiphy *wiphy,
- void (*reg_notifier) (struct wiphy * wiphy,
+ void (*reg_notifier)(struct wiphy *wiphy,
struct regulatory_request *
request))
{
@@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ static void _rtw_regd_init_wiphy(struct rtw_regulatory *reg,
}
int rtw_regd_init(struct adapter *padapter,
- void (*reg_notifier) (struct wiphy * wiphy,
+ void (*reg_notifier)(struct wiphy *wiphy,
struct regulatory_request *request))
{
struct wiphy *wiphy = padapter->rtw_wdev->wiphy;
--
2.7.4
This patch improves the formatting of block comments and removes one
commented-out line of code entirely (keeping it would be redundant
thanks to version control).
Signed-off-by: Fabian Wolff <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mate Horvath <[email protected]>
---
drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/wifi_regd.c | 16 ++++++++--------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/wifi_regd.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/wifi_regd.c
index 00c7b0d..043b34e 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/wifi_regd.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/wifi_regd.c
@@ -14,8 +14,8 @@
*/
/*
- *Only these channels all allow active
- *scan on all world regulatory domains
+ * Only these channels all allow active
+ * scan on all world regulatory domains
*/
/* 2G chan 01 - chan 11 */
@@ -23,8 +23,8 @@
REG_RULE(2412 - 10, 2462 + 10, 40, 0, 20, 0)
/*
- *We enable active scan on these a case
- *by case basis by regulatory domain
+ * We enable active scan on these a case
+ * by case basis by regulatory domain
*/
/* 2G chan 12 - chan 13, PASSIV SCAN */
@@ -49,7 +49,8 @@ static const struct ieee80211_regdomain rtw_regdom_rd = {
static int rtw_ieee80211_channel_to_frequency(int chan, int band)
{
/* see 802.11 17.3.8.3.2 and Annex J
- * there are overlapping channel numbers in 5GHz and 2GHz bands */
+ * there are overlapping channel numbers in 5GHz and 2GHz bands
+ */
/* NL80211_BAND_2GHZ */
if (chan == 14)
@@ -73,7 +74,7 @@ static void _rtw_reg_apply_flags(struct wiphy *wiphy)
u16 channel;
u32 freq;
- /* all channels disable */
+ /* all channels disable */
for (i = 0; i < NUM_NL80211_BANDS; i++) {
sband = wiphy->bands[i];
@@ -87,7 +88,7 @@ static void _rtw_reg_apply_flags(struct wiphy *wiphy)
}
}
- /* channels apply by channel plans. */
+ /* channels apply by channel plans. */
for (i = 0; i < max_chan_nums; i++) {
channel = channel_set[i].ChannelNum;
freq =
@@ -147,7 +148,6 @@ int rtw_regd_init(struct adapter *padapter,
void (*reg_notifier) (struct wiphy * wiphy,
struct regulatory_request *request))
{
- /* struct registry_priv *registrypriv = &padapter->registrypriv; */
struct wiphy *wiphy = padapter->rtw_wdev->wiphy;
_rtw_regd_init_wiphy(NULL, wiphy, reg_notifier);
--
2.7.4
This patch adjusts the alignment of several lines to match their
respective opening parenthesis.
Signed-off-by: Fabian Wolff <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mate Horvath <[email protected]>
---
drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/wifi_regd.c | 9 +++++----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/wifi_regd.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/wifi_regd.c
index 55d444d..c8945da 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/wifi_regd.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/wifi_regd.c
@@ -122,10 +122,11 @@ static const struct ieee80211_regdomain *_rtw_regdomain_select(struct
}
static void _rtw_regd_init_wiphy(struct rtw_regulatory *reg,
- struct wiphy *wiphy,
- void (*reg_notifier)(struct wiphy *wiphy,
- struct regulatory_request *
- request))
+ struct wiphy *wiphy,
+ void (*reg_notifier)(struct wiphy *wiphy,
+ struct
+ regulatory_request *
+ request))
{
const struct ieee80211_regdomain *regd;
--
2.7.4
This patch removes unnecessary braces in an if/else-construct, thereby
fixing both a checkpatch.pl warning about superfluous braces and an
error about an ill-placed closing brace preceding the "else" keyword.
Signed-off-by: Fabian Wolff <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mate Horvath <[email protected]>
---
drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/wifi_regd.c | 6 ++----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/wifi_regd.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/wifi_regd.c
index 043b34e..5e01846 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/wifi_regd.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/wifi_regd.c
@@ -97,12 +97,10 @@ static void _rtw_reg_apply_flags(struct wiphy *wiphy)
ch = ieee80211_get_channel(wiphy, freq);
if (ch) {
- if (channel_set[i].ScanType == SCAN_PASSIVE) {
+ if (channel_set[i].ScanType == SCAN_PASSIVE)
ch->flags = IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_IR;
- }
- else {
+ else
ch->flags = 0;
- }
}
}
}
--
2.7.4
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 12:46:10PM +0200, Fabian Wolff wrote:
> This patch adds spaces around the binary operators '-' and '+', which
> is the preferred style, and reformats a pointer argument declaration
> to fix a false positive "spaces preferred around that '*'" message
> reported by checkpatch.pl.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fabian Wolff <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Mate Horvath <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/wifi_regd.c | 10 +++++-----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/wifi_regd.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/wifi_regd.c
> index 9c61125..803eab0 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/wifi_regd.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/wifi_regd.c
> @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
>
> /* 2G chan 01 - chan 11 */
> #define RTW_2GHZ_CH01_11 \
> - REG_RULE(2412-10, 2462+10, 40, 0, 20, 0)
> + REG_RULE(2412 - 10, 2462 + 10, 40, 0, 20, 0)
>
> /*
> *We enable active scan on these a case
> @@ -29,12 +29,12 @@
>
> /* 2G chan 12 - chan 13, PASSIV SCAN */
> #define RTW_2GHZ_CH12_13 \
> - REG_RULE(2467-10, 2472+10, 40, 0, 20, \
> + REG_RULE(2467 - 10, 2472 + 10, 40, 0, 20, \
> NL80211_RRF_PASSIVE_SCAN)
>
> /* 2G chan 14, PASSIVS SCAN, NO OFDM (B only) */
> #define RTW_2GHZ_CH14 \
> - REG_RULE(2484-10, 2484+10, 40, 0, 20, \
> + REG_RULE(2484 - 10, 2484 + 10, 40, 0, 20, \
> NL80211_RRF_PASSIVE_SCAN | NL80211_RRF_NO_OFDM)
>
> static const struct ieee80211_regdomain rtw_regdom_rd = {
> @@ -116,8 +116,8 @@ static int _rtw_reg_notifier_apply(struct wiphy *wiphy,
> }
>
> static const struct ieee80211_regdomain *_rtw_regdomain_select(struct
> - rtw_regulatory
> - *reg)
> + rtw_regulatory *
> + reg)
Why make this last change? It's not an arithmatic one :(
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 02:58:43PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 12:46:10PM +0200, Fabian Wolff wrote:
> > This patch adds spaces around the binary operators '-' and '+', which
> > is the preferred style, and reformats a pointer argument declaration
> > to fix a false positive "spaces preferred around that '*'" message
> > reported by checkpatch.pl.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Fabian Wolff <[email protected]>
> > Signed-off-by: Mate Horvath <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/wifi_regd.c | 10 +++++-----
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/wifi_regd.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/wifi_regd.c
> > index 9c61125..803eab0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/wifi_regd.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/wifi_regd.c
> > @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
> >
> > /* 2G chan 01 - chan 11 */
> > #define RTW_2GHZ_CH01_11 \
> > - REG_RULE(2412-10, 2462+10, 40, 0, 20, 0)
> > + REG_RULE(2412 - 10, 2462 + 10, 40, 0, 20, 0)
> >
> > /*
> > *We enable active scan on these a case
> > @@ -29,12 +29,12 @@
> >
> > /* 2G chan 12 - chan 13, PASSIV SCAN */
> > #define RTW_2GHZ_CH12_13 \
> > - REG_RULE(2467-10, 2472+10, 40, 0, 20, \
> > + REG_RULE(2467 - 10, 2472 + 10, 40, 0, 20, \
> > NL80211_RRF_PASSIVE_SCAN)
> >
> > /* 2G chan 14, PASSIVS SCAN, NO OFDM (B only) */
> > #define RTW_2GHZ_CH14 \
> > - REG_RULE(2484-10, 2484+10, 40, 0, 20, \
> > + REG_RULE(2484 - 10, 2484 + 10, 40, 0, 20, \
> > NL80211_RRF_PASSIVE_SCAN | NL80211_RRF_NO_OFDM)
> >
> > static const struct ieee80211_regdomain rtw_regdom_rd = {
> > @@ -116,8 +116,8 @@ static int _rtw_reg_notifier_apply(struct wiphy *wiphy,
> > }
> >
> > static const struct ieee80211_regdomain *_rtw_regdomain_select(struct
> > - rtw_regulatory
> > - *reg)
> > + rtw_regulatory *
> > + reg)
>
> Why make this last change? It's not an arithmatic one :(
And can you refresh this series and resend the remaining ones? They all
didn't apply :(
On 12 June 2017 at 20:46, Fabian Wolff <[email protected]> wrote:
> This patch adds spaces around the binary operators '-' and '+', which
> is the preferred style, and reformats a pointer argument declaration
> to fix a false positive "spaces preferred around that '*'" message
> reported by checkpatch.pl.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fabian Wolff <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Mate Horvath <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/wifi_regd.c | 10 +++++-----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/wifi_regd.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/wifi_regd.c
> index 9c61125..803eab0 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/wifi_regd.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/wifi_regd.c
> @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
>
> /* 2G chan 01 - chan 11 */
> #define RTW_2GHZ_CH01_11 \
> - REG_RULE(2412-10, 2462+10, 40, 0, 20, 0)
> + REG_RULE(2412 - 10, 2462 + 10, 40, 0, 20, 0)
>
> /*
> *We enable active scan on these a case
> @@ -29,12 +29,12 @@
>
> /* 2G chan 12 - chan 13, PASSIV SCAN */
> #define RTW_2GHZ_CH12_13 \
> - REG_RULE(2467-10, 2472+10, 40, 0, 20, \
> + REG_RULE(2467 - 10, 2472 + 10, 40, 0, 20, \
> NL80211_RRF_PASSIVE_SCAN)
>
> /* 2G chan 14, PASSIVS SCAN, NO OFDM (B only) */
> #define RTW_2GHZ_CH14 \
> - REG_RULE(2484-10, 2484+10, 40, 0, 20, \
> + REG_RULE(2484 - 10, 2484 + 10, 40, 0, 20, \
> NL80211_RRF_PASSIVE_SCAN | NL80211_RRF_NO_OFDM)
>
The construct 'freq_start-10, freq_end+10' is consistent with other drivers e.g.
drivers/net/wireless/mac80211_hwsim.c
drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmsmac/channel.c:#define
drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/cfg80211.c
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/regd.c
drivers/net/wireless/ath/regd.c
and looks better (to me) without the inserted spaces.
If the change is required will the other drivers be 'corrected'?
> static const struct ieee80211_regdomain rtw_regdom_rd = {
> @@ -116,8 +116,8 @@ static int _rtw_reg_notifier_apply(struct wiphy *wiphy,
> }
>
> static const struct ieee80211_regdomain *_rtw_regdomain_select(struct
> - rtw_regulatory
> - *reg)
> + rtw_regulatory *
> + reg)
> {
> return &rtw_regdom_rd;
> }
> --
> 2.7.4
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
Kernel style is to have spaces around the operators. This is staging
code so we do all the style fixes. We don't always update older drivers
but sometimes we do. No one is planning to change those drivers though
so I guess the answer is no we're not going to update those unless you
are?
regards,
dan carpenter
v1->v2: Refresh patches and restrict the first patch to arithmetic operators
This patch series fixes all errors and warnings generated by
checkpatch.pl for wifi_regd.c.
Fabian Wolff (5):
staging: rtl8723bs: wifi_regd.c: put spaces around binary operators
staging: rtl8723bs: wifi_regd.c: fix comment formatting
staging: rtl8723bs: wifi_regd.c: remove superfluous spaces from
pointer arguments
staging: rtl8723bs: wifi_regd.c: adjust alignment to match open
parenthesis
staging: rtl8723bs: wifi_regd.c: insert blank line after declarations
drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/wifi_regd.c | 34 +++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
--
2.7.4
This patch adds spaces around the binary operators '-' and '+'.
Signed-off-by: Fabian Wolff <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mate Horvath <[email protected]>
---
v1->v2: apply changes only to arithmetic operators
drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/wifi_regd.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/wifi_regd.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/wifi_regd.c
index 115ba66..5bcf968 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/wifi_regd.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/wifi_regd.c
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
/* 2G chan 01 - chan 11 */
#define RTW_2GHZ_CH01_11 \
- REG_RULE(2412-10, 2462+10, 40, 0, 20, 0)
+ REG_RULE(2412 - 10, 2462 + 10, 40, 0, 20, 0)
/*
*We enable active scan on these a case
@@ -29,12 +29,12 @@
/* 2G chan 12 - chan 13, PASSIV SCAN */
#define RTW_2GHZ_CH12_13 \
- REG_RULE(2467-10, 2472+10, 40, 0, 20, \
+ REG_RULE(2467 - 10, 2472 + 10, 40, 0, 20, \
NL80211_RRF_PASSIVE_SCAN)
/* 2G chan 14, PASSIVS SCAN, NO OFDM (B only) */
#define RTW_2GHZ_CH14 \
- REG_RULE(2484-10, 2484+10, 40, 0, 20, \
+ REG_RULE(2484 - 10, 2484 + 10, 40, 0, 20, \
NL80211_RRF_PASSIVE_SCAN | NL80211_RRF_NO_OFDM)
static const struct ieee80211_regdomain rtw_regdom_rd = {
--
2.7.4
This patch implements the suggestions of checkpatch.pl to remove
unnecessary spaces before function pointer arguments as well as in
statements of the form "foo * bar" (which should be "foo *bar").
Signed-off-by: Fabian Wolff <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mate Horvath <[email protected]>
---
v1->v2: refresh patch
drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/wifi_regd.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/wifi_regd.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/wifi_regd.c
index 53ff2ce..6c8d475 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/wifi_regd.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/wifi_regd.c
@@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ static const struct ieee80211_regdomain *_rtw_regdomain_select(struct
static void _rtw_regd_init_wiphy(struct rtw_regulatory *reg,
struct wiphy *wiphy,
- void (*reg_notifier) (struct wiphy * wiphy,
+ void (*reg_notifier)(struct wiphy *wiphy,
struct regulatory_request *
request))
{
@@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ static void _rtw_regd_init_wiphy(struct rtw_regulatory *reg,
}
int rtw_regd_init(struct adapter *padapter,
- void (*reg_notifier) (struct wiphy * wiphy,
+ void (*reg_notifier)(struct wiphy *wiphy,
struct regulatory_request *request))
{
struct wiphy *wiphy = padapter->rtw_wdev->wiphy;
--
2.7.4
This patch inserts a missing blank line after variable declarations.
Signed-off-by: Fabian Wolff <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mate Horvath <[email protected]>
---
v1->v2: refresh patch
drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/wifi_regd.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/wifi_regd.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/wifi_regd.c
index 68890b4..305e88a 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/wifi_regd.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/wifi_regd.c
@@ -148,6 +148,7 @@ int rtw_regd_init(struct adapter *padapter,
struct regulatory_request *request))
{
struct wiphy *wiphy = padapter->rtw_wdev->wiphy;
+
_rtw_regd_init_wiphy(NULL, wiphy, reg_notifier);
return 0;
--
2.7.4
This patch adjusts the alignment of several lines to match their
respective opening parenthesis.
Signed-off-by: Fabian Wolff <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mate Horvath <[email protected]>
---
v1->v2: refresh patch
drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/wifi_regd.c | 9 +++++----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/wifi_regd.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/wifi_regd.c
index 6c8d475..68890b4 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/wifi_regd.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/wifi_regd.c
@@ -122,10 +122,11 @@ static const struct ieee80211_regdomain *_rtw_regdomain_select(struct
}
static void _rtw_regd_init_wiphy(struct rtw_regulatory *reg,
- struct wiphy *wiphy,
- void (*reg_notifier)(struct wiphy *wiphy,
- struct regulatory_request *
- request))
+ struct wiphy *wiphy,
+ void (*reg_notifier)(struct wiphy *wiphy,
+ struct
+ regulatory_request *
+ request))
{
const struct ieee80211_regdomain *regd;
--
2.7.4
This patch improves the formatting of block comments and removes one
commented-out line of code entirely (keeping it would be redundant
thanks to version control).
Signed-off-by: Fabian Wolff <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mate Horvath <[email protected]>
---
v1->v2: refresh patch
drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/wifi_regd.c | 16 ++++++++--------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/wifi_regd.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/wifi_regd.c
index 5bcf968..53ff2ce 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/wifi_regd.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/wifi_regd.c
@@ -14,8 +14,8 @@
*/
/*
- *Only these channels all allow active
- *scan on all world regulatory domains
+ * Only these channels all allow active
+ * scan on all world regulatory domains
*/
/* 2G chan 01 - chan 11 */
@@ -23,8 +23,8 @@
REG_RULE(2412 - 10, 2462 + 10, 40, 0, 20, 0)
/*
- *We enable active scan on these a case
- *by case basis by regulatory domain
+ * We enable active scan on these a case
+ * by case basis by regulatory domain
*/
/* 2G chan 12 - chan 13, PASSIV SCAN */
@@ -49,7 +49,8 @@ static const struct ieee80211_regdomain rtw_regdom_rd = {
static int rtw_ieee80211_channel_to_frequency(int chan, int band)
{
/* see 802.11 17.3.8.3.2 and Annex J
- * there are overlapping channel numbers in 5GHz and 2GHz bands */
+ * there are overlapping channel numbers in 5GHz and 2GHz bands
+ */
/* NL80211_BAND_2GHZ */
if (chan == 14)
@@ -73,7 +74,7 @@ static void _rtw_reg_apply_flags(struct wiphy *wiphy)
u16 channel;
u32 freq;
- /* all channels disable */
+ /* all channels disable */
for (i = 0; i < NUM_NL80211_BANDS; i++) {
sband = wiphy->bands[i];
@@ -87,7 +88,7 @@ static void _rtw_reg_apply_flags(struct wiphy *wiphy)
}
}
- /* channels apply by channel plans. */
+ /* channels apply by channel plans. */
for (i = 0; i < max_chan_nums; i++) {
channel = channel_set[i].ChannelNum;
freq =
@@ -145,7 +146,6 @@ int rtw_regd_init(struct adapter *padapter,
void (*reg_notifier) (struct wiphy * wiphy,
struct regulatory_request *request))
{
- /* struct registry_priv *registrypriv = &padapter->registrypriv; */
struct wiphy *wiphy = padapter->rtw_wdev->wiphy;
_rtw_regd_init_wiphy(NULL, wiphy, reg_notifier);
--
2.7.4
On 14 June 2017 at 00:36, Dan Carpenter <[email protected]> wrote:
> Kernel style is to have spaces around the operators. This is staging
> code so we do all the style fixes. We don't always update older drivers
> but sometimes we do. No one is planning to change those drivers though
> so I guess the answer is no we're not going to update those unless you
> are?
>
Thanks for the explanation. I assume submitting changes for the
drivers I identified would only be seen as minor corrections to 'the
chaff' resulting in unnecessary churn. If however it is expected that
corrections should be made when identified then I'm willing to prepare
a patch set. I'm happy to take advice either way.
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 09:49:10PM +1000, Ian W MORRISON wrote:
> On 14 June 2017 at 00:36, Dan Carpenter <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Kernel style is to have spaces around the operators. This is staging
> > code so we do all the style fixes. We don't always update older drivers
> > but sometimes we do. No one is planning to change those drivers though
> > so I guess the answer is no we're not going to update those unless you
> > are?
> >
>
> Thanks for the explanation. I assume submitting changes for the
> drivers I identified would only be seen as minor corrections to 'the
> chaff' resulting in unnecessary churn. If however it is expected that
> corrections should be made when identified then I'm willing to prepare
> a patch set. I'm happy to take advice either way.
I would just leave the old drivers as-is.
Having spaces around operators has always been kernel style, but it's
only fairly recently that checkpatch.pl started to complain. We keep
making checkpatch.pl more stict as time goes on. I think that's good
because some reviewers will make you redo patches for style issues so
having checkpatch.pl complain early on means you don't have redo the
patch. But it also means that old code will never be checkpatch.pl
clean because we keep adding new checkpatch warnings.
And it's fine that old code has checkpatch warnings. The point of
checkpatch is to check new patches not to churn through old code. As a
reviewer, I find that checkpatch saves my time because I can often tell
people to run it instead of listing all the style complaints.
regards,
dan carpenter
On Wed, 2017-06-14 at 15:19 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 09:49:10PM +1000, Ian W MORRISON wrote:
> > On 14 June 2017 at 00:36, Dan Carpenter <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Kernel style is to have spaces around the operators. This is staging
> > > code so we do all the style fixes. We don't always update older drivers
> > > but sometimes we do. No one is planning to change those drivers though
> > > so I guess the answer is no we're not going to update those unless you
> > > are?
> > >
> >
> > Thanks for the explanation. I assume submitting changes for the
> > drivers I identified would only be seen as minor corrections to 'the
> > chaff' resulting in unnecessary churn. If however it is expected that
> > corrections should be made when identified then I'm willing to prepare
> > a patch set. I'm happy to take advice either way.
>
> I would just leave the old drivers as-is.
There would be some value in converting them, if only to
note what functions are identical across multiple drivers
and could be consolidated.
> Having spaces around operators has always been kernel style,?but it's
> only fairly recently that checkpatch.pl started to complain.
Not really. Linux is a relatively old project.
The CodingStyle for spaces around operators was added about
ten years ago. ?Bit shifts were and still are not mentioned.
Messages for spaces around arithmetic were not emitted because
so much old code had various styles and it would have been a
lot of churn to update with many complaints from various
maintainers. checkpatch today would emit about a quarter
million error messages for spacing on the kernel source tree.
That's a lot of whitespace churn.
There is a lot of code in drivers and a few other areas that
hasn't been touched in those ten years that doesn't follow
today's commonly accepted coding styles.
CodingStyle still doesn't mention a lot of style nits and bits.
About spacing around bit shifts:
This is just a --strict preference that several people had
expressed a desire to warn about spaces around arithmetic
and bit operators.
It was added a couple years ago to checkpatch but not to
CodingStyle.
The --strict test applies by default to net/and drivers/net
because DaveM is pretty style conscious and asks for rework
when patches don't have the style he prefers.
And the --strict test applies to drivers/staging as well
because it gives more opportunities for first-time patch
submitters to send cleanup style patches (and GregKH can
be a stickler too).
> We keep making checkpatch.pl more stict as time goes on.
I try to add things to checkpatch only when there seems to
be a general consensus about a style or when a significant
percentage of code throughout the kernel already follows a?
specific style.
Actively developed Kernel code now has a fairly uniform
style and additions to checkpatch seem less necessary.
One area where checkpatch could use some enhancing is in
tracking indentation better.
checkpatch doesn't emit warnings with indentation like:
statement(1);
statement(2);
where the statements should be aligned on the same tabstop.
I'm playing with it but patches welcome...
> I think that's good
> because some reviewers will make you redo patches for style issues so
> having checkpatch.pl complain early on means you don't have redo the
> patch. But it also means that old code will never be checkpatch.pl
> clean because we keep adding new checkpatch warnings.
>
> And it's fine that old code has checkpatch warnings. The point of
> checkpatch is to check new patches not to churn through old code. As a
> reviewer, I find that checkpatch saves my time because I can often tell
> people to run it instead of listing all the style complaints.
All very true.