On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 4:27 AM, Theodore Ts'o <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 02:22:50PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
>>
>> It's head of my virtio-next tree.
>
> Hey Rusty,
>
> While we have your attention --- what's your opinion about adding TRIM
> support to virtio-blk. I understand that you're starting an OASIS
> standardization process for virtio --- what does that mean vis-a-vis a
> patch to plumb discard support through virtio-blk?
virtio-scsi already supports discard. But maybe you cannot switch
away from virtio-blk?
If you need to add discard to virtio-blk then it could be added to the
standard. The standards text is kept in a svn repository here:
https://tools.oasis-open.org/version-control/browse/wsvn/virtio/
Stefan
Stefan Hajnoczi <[email protected]> writes:
> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 4:27 AM, Theodore Ts'o <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 02:22:50PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
>>>
>>> It's head of my virtio-next tree.
>>
>> Hey Rusty,
>>
>> While we have your attention --- what's your opinion about adding TRIM
>> support to virtio-blk. I understand that you're starting an OASIS
>> standardization process for virtio --- what does that mean vis-a-vis a
>> patch to plumb discard support through virtio-blk?
>
> virtio-scsi already supports discard. But maybe you cannot switch
> away from virtio-blk?
>
> If you need to add discard to virtio-blk then it could be added to the
> standard. The standards text is kept in a svn repository here:
> https://tools.oasis-open.org/version-control/browse/wsvn/virtio/
It would be trivial to add, and I wouldn't be completely opposed, but we
generally point to virtio-scsi when people want actual features.
Cheers,
Rusty.