This reverts commit ec3b7b6eb8c90b52f61adff11b6db7a8db34de19.
Commits from @umn.edu addresses have been found to be submitted in "bad
faith" to try to test the kernel community's ability to review "known
malicious" changes. The result of these submissions can be found in a
paper published at the 42nd IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy
entitled, "Open Source Insecurity: Stealthily Introducing
Vulnerabilities via Hypocrite Commits" written by Qiushi Wu (University
of Minnesota) and Kangjie Lu (University of Minnesota).
Because of this, all submissions from this group must be reverted from
the kernel tree and will need to be re-reviewed again to determine if
they actually are a valid fix. Until that work is complete, remove this
change to ensure that no problems are being introduced into the
codebase.
Cc: Kangjie Lu <[email protected]>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <[email protected]>
Cc: https
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/oaktrail_crtc.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/oaktrail_crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/oaktrail_crtc.c
index 129f87971002..f74041a102d9 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/oaktrail_crtc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/oaktrail_crtc.c
@@ -129,7 +129,6 @@ static bool mrst_sdvo_find_best_pll(const struct gma_limit_t *limit,
s32 freq_error, min_error = 100000;
memset(best_clock, 0, sizeof(*best_clock));
- memset(&clock, 0, sizeof(clock));
for (clock.m = limit->m.min; clock.m <= limit->m.max; clock.m++) {
for (clock.n = limit->n.min; clock.n <= limit->n.max;
@@ -186,7 +185,6 @@ static bool mrst_lvds_find_best_pll(const struct gma_limit_t *limit,
int err = target;
memset(best_clock, 0, sizeof(*best_clock));
- memset(&clock, 0, sizeof(clock));
for (clock.m = limit->m.min; clock.m <= limit->m.max; clock.m++) {
for (clock.p1 = limit->p1.min; clock.p1 <= limit->p1.max;
--
2.31.1
On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 3:06 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> This reverts commit ec3b7b6eb8c90b52f61adff11b6db7a8db34de19.
>
> Commits from @umn.edu addresses have been found to be submitted in "bad
> faith" to try to test the kernel community's ability to review "known
> malicious" changes. The result of these submissions can be found in a
> paper published at the 42nd IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy
> entitled, "Open Source Insecurity: Stealthily Introducing
> Vulnerabilities via Hypocrite Commits" written by Qiushi Wu (University
> of Minnesota) and Kangjie Lu (University of Minnesota).
>
> Because of this, all submissions from this group must be reverted from
> the kernel tree and will need to be re-reviewed again to determine if
> they actually are a valid fix. Until that work is complete, remove this
> change to ensure that no problems are being introduced into the
> codebase.
>
> Cc: Kangjie Lu <[email protected]>
> Cc: Daniel Vetter <[email protected]>
> Cc: https
> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <[email protected]>
gma500 is dead enough I'm not going to spend a single cycle thinking
whether this fixes anything or not and hence whether the revert is ok
or not.
-Daniel
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/oaktrail_crtc.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/oaktrail_crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/oaktrail_crtc.c
> index 129f87971002..f74041a102d9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/oaktrail_crtc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/oaktrail_crtc.c
> @@ -129,7 +129,6 @@ static bool mrst_sdvo_find_best_pll(const struct gma_limit_t *limit,
> s32 freq_error, min_error = 100000;
>
> memset(best_clock, 0, sizeof(*best_clock));
> - memset(&clock, 0, sizeof(clock));
>
> for (clock.m = limit->m.min; clock.m <= limit->m.max; clock.m++) {
> for (clock.n = limit->n.min; clock.n <= limit->n.max;
> @@ -186,7 +185,6 @@ static bool mrst_lvds_find_best_pll(const struct gma_limit_t *limit,
> int err = target;
>
> memset(best_clock, 0, sizeof(*best_clock));
> - memset(&clock, 0, sizeof(clock));
>
> for (clock.m = limit->m.min; clock.m <= limit->m.max; clock.m++) {
> for (clock.p1 = limit->p1.min; clock.p1 <= limit->p1.max;
> --
> 2.31.1
>
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 07:51:49PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 3:06 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > This reverts commit ec3b7b6eb8c90b52f61adff11b6db7a8db34de19.
> >
> > Commits from @umn.edu addresses have been found to be submitted in "bad
> > faith" to try to test the kernel community's ability to review "known
> > malicious" changes. The result of these submissions can be found in a
> > paper published at the 42nd IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy
> > entitled, "Open Source Insecurity: Stealthily Introducing
> > Vulnerabilities via Hypocrite Commits" written by Qiushi Wu (University
> > of Minnesota) and Kangjie Lu (University of Minnesota).
> >
> > Because of this, all submissions from this group must be reverted from
> > the kernel tree and will need to be re-reviewed again to determine if
> > they actually are a valid fix. Until that work is complete, remove this
> > change to ensure that no problems are being introduced into the
> > codebase.
> >
> > Cc: Kangjie Lu <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Daniel Vetter <[email protected]>
> > Cc: https
> > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
>
> Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <[email protected]>
>
> gma500 is dead enough I'm not going to spend a single cycle thinking
> whether this fixes anything or not and hence whether the revert is ok
> or not.
Sounds good to me, I'll keep the reverts.
greg k-h
On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 03:43:41PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 07:51:49PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 3:06 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > This reverts commit ec3b7b6eb8c90b52f61adff11b6db7a8db34de19.
> > >
> > > Commits from @umn.edu addresses have been found to be submitted in "bad
> > > faith" to try to test the kernel community's ability to review "known
> > > malicious" changes. The result of these submissions can be found in a
> > > paper published at the 42nd IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy
> > > entitled, "Open Source Insecurity: Stealthily Introducing
> > > Vulnerabilities via Hypocrite Commits" written by Qiushi Wu (University
> > > of Minnesota) and Kangjie Lu (University of Minnesota).
> > >
> > > Because of this, all submissions from this group must be reverted from
> > > the kernel tree and will need to be re-reviewed again to determine if
> > > they actually are a valid fix. Until that work is complete, remove this
> > > change to ensure that no problems are being introduced into the
> > > codebase.
> > >
> > > Cc: Kangjie Lu <[email protected]>
> > > Cc: Daniel Vetter <[email protected]>
> > > Cc: https
> > > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
> >
> > Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <[email protected]>
> >
> > gma500 is dead enough I'm not going to spend a single cycle thinking
> > whether this fixes anything or not and hence whether the revert is ok
> > or not.
>
> Sounds good to me, I'll keep the reverts.
I've re-reviewed this one, and it seems sane, so I'll drop the revert.
thanks,
greg k-h