Dear Maxime,
with commit 49c726d55c1b ("clk: sunxi: Add Kconfig options"), you
introduce various build configurations for Legacy clock support for
Allwinner SoCs. Among them, you introduce the config
CLK_SUNXI_PRCM_SUN9I in drivers/clk/sunxi/Kconfig, but this config is
not used anywhere in the kernel tree.
Can we just delete this config CLK_SUNXI_PRCM_SUN9I again, as it is
not needed, or did you simply miss to adjust the Makefile for this
option to be effective?
I will gladly send a patch, once you could give me a quick pointer.
Best regards,
Lukas
Note: This is a resent email (see original email:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAKXUXMzqCktKz7vGN4_QAp4n1SeP0-YHL19evmVSfseZOemd5g@mail.gmail.com/);
now hopefully with an email address for Maxime that reaches Maxime.
Hi Lukas,
Dne sreda, 10. maj 2023 ob 07:38:04 CEST je Lukas Bulwahn napisal(a):
> Dear Maxime,
>
I don't see Maxime in recipients...
> with commit 49c726d55c1b ("clk: sunxi: Add Kconfig options"), you
> introduce various build configurations for Legacy clock support for
> Allwinner SoCs. Among them, you introduce the config
> CLK_SUNXI_PRCM_SUN9I in drivers/clk/sunxi/Kconfig, but this config is
> not used anywhere in the kernel tree.
>
> Can we just delete this config CLK_SUNXI_PRCM_SUN9I again, as it is
> not needed, or did you simply miss to adjust the Makefile for this
> option to be effective?
I think this is the best approach. If it wasn't used by now, it can only make
further mess in distro configs if introduced.
Best regards,
Jernej
>
> I will gladly send a patch, once you could give me a quick pointer.
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Lukas
>
> Note: This is a resent email (see original email:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAKXUXMzqCktKz7vGN4_QAp4n1SeP0-YHL19evmVSfseZOem
> [email protected]/); now hopefully with an email address for Maxime that
> reaches Maxime.