2020-08-16 08:33:46

by Coly Li

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v5 1/3] net: introduce helper sendpage_ok() in include/linux/net.h

The original problem was from nvme-over-tcp code, who mistakenly uses
kernel_sendpage() to send pages allocated by __get_free_pages() without
__GFP_COMP flag. Such pages don't have refcount (page_count is 0) on
tail pages, sending them by kernel_sendpage() may trigger a kernel panic
from a corrupted kernel heap, because these pages are incorrectly freed
in network stack as page_count 0 pages.

This patch introduces a helper sendpage_ok(), it returns true if the
checking page,
- is not slab page: PageSlab(page) is false.
- has page refcount: page_count(page) is not zero

All drivers who want to send page to remote end by kernel_sendpage()
may use this helper to check whether the page is OK. If the helper does
not return true, the driver should try other non sendpage method (e.g.
sock_no_sendpage()) to handle the page.

Signed-off-by: Coly Li <[email protected]>
Cc: Chaitanya Kulkarni <[email protected]>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
Cc: Hannes Reinecke <[email protected]>
Cc: Jan Kara <[email protected]>
Cc: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
Cc: Mikhail Skorzhinskii <[email protected]>
Cc: Philipp Reisner <[email protected]>
Cc: Sagi Grimberg <[email protected]>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
---
Changelog:
v5, include linux/mm.h in include/linux/net.h
v4, change sendpage_ok() as an inline helper, and post it as
separate patch.
v3, introduce a more common sendpage_ok()
v2, fix typo in patch subject
v1, the initial version.
include/linux/net.h | 16 ++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/linux/net.h b/include/linux/net.h
index d48ff1180879..a807fad31958 100644
--- a/include/linux/net.h
+++ b/include/linux/net.h
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
#include <linux/rcupdate.h>
#include <linux/once.h>
#include <linux/fs.h>
+#include <linux/mm.h>
#include <linux/sockptr.h>

#include <uapi/linux/net.h>
@@ -286,6 +287,21 @@ do { \
#define net_get_random_once_wait(buf, nbytes) \
get_random_once_wait((buf), (nbytes))

+/*
+ * E.g. XFS meta- & log-data is in slab pages, or bcache meta
+ * data pages, or other high order pages allocated by
+ * __get_free_pages() without __GFP_COMP, which have a page_count
+ * of 0 and/or have PageSlab() set. We cannot use send_page for
+ * those, as that does get_page(); put_page(); and would cause
+ * either a VM_BUG directly, or __page_cache_release a page that
+ * would actually still be referenced by someone, leading to some
+ * obscure delayed Oops somewhere else.
+ */
+static inline bool sendpage_ok(struct page *page)
+{
+ return (!PageSlab(page) && page_count(page) >= 1);
+}
+
int kernel_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, struct kvec *vec,
size_t num, size_t len);
int kernel_sendmsg_locked(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg,
--
2.26.2


2020-08-16 08:37:30

by Coly Li

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v5 2/3] nvme-tcp: check page by sendpage_ok() before calling kernel_sendpage()

Currently nvme_tcp_try_send_data() doesn't use kernel_sendpage() to
send slab pages. But for pages allocated by __get_free_pages() without
__GFP_COMP, which also have refcount as 0, they are still sent by
kernel_sendpage() to remote end, this is problematic.

The new introduced helper sendpage_ok() checks both PageSlab tag and
page_count counter, and returns true if the checking page is OK to be
sent by kernel_sendpage().

This patch fixes the page checking issue of nvme_tcp_try_send_data()
with sendpage_ok(). If sendpage_ok() returns true, send this page by
kernel_sendpage(), otherwise use sock_no_sendpage to handle this page.

Signed-off-by: Coly Li <[email protected]>
Cc: Chaitanya Kulkarni <[email protected]>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
Cc: Hannes Reinecke <[email protected]>
Cc: Jan Kara <[email protected]>
Cc: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
Cc: Mikhail Skorzhinskii <[email protected]>
Cc: Philipp Reisner <[email protected]>
Cc: Sagi Grimberg <[email protected]>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
---
Changelog:
v4, change sendpage_ok() as an inline helper, and post it as
separate patch.
v3, introduce a more common sendpage_ok()
v2, fix typo in patch subject
v1, the initial version.
drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c | 7 +++----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c b/drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c
index 62fbaecdc960..902fe742762b 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c
@@ -912,12 +912,11 @@ static int nvme_tcp_try_send_data(struct nvme_tcp_request *req)
else
flags |= MSG_MORE | MSG_SENDPAGE_NOTLAST;

- /* can't zcopy slab pages */
- if (unlikely(PageSlab(page))) {
- ret = sock_no_sendpage(queue->sock, page, offset, len,
+ if (sendpage_ok(page)) {
+ ret = kernel_sendpage(queue->sock, page, offset, len,
flags);
} else {
- ret = kernel_sendpage(queue->sock, page, offset, len,
+ ret = sock_no_sendpage(queue->sock, page, offset, len,
flags);
}
if (ret <= 0)
--
2.26.2

2020-08-16 08:39:32

by Coly Li

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v5 3/3] drbd: code cleanup by using sendpage_ok() to check page for kernel_sendpage()

In _drbd_send_page() a page is checked by following code before sending
it by kernel_sendpage(),
(page_count(page) < 1) || PageSlab(page)
If the check is true, this page won't be send by kernel_sendpage() and
handled by sock_no_sendpage().

This kind of check is exactly what macro sendpage_ok() does, which is
introduced into include/linux/net.h to solve a similar send page issue
in nvme-tcp code.

This patch uses macro sendpage_ok() to replace the open coded checks to
page type and refcount in _drbd_send_page(), as a code cleanup.

Signed-off-by: Coly Li <[email protected]>
Cc: Philipp Reisner <[email protected]>
Cc: Sagi Grimberg <[email protected]>
---
Changelog:
v3, introduce a more common sendpage_ok()
v2, fix typo in patch subject
v1, the initial version.
drivers/block/drbd/drbd_main.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_main.c b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_main.c
index cb687ccdbd96..55dc0c91781e 100644
--- a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_main.c
+++ b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_main.c
@@ -1553,7 +1553,7 @@ static int _drbd_send_page(struct drbd_peer_device *peer_device, struct page *pa
* put_page(); and would cause either a VM_BUG directly, or
* __page_cache_release a page that would actually still be referenced
* by someone, leading to some obscure delayed Oops somewhere else. */
- if (drbd_disable_sendpage || (page_count(page) < 1) || PageSlab(page))
+ if (drbd_disable_sendpage || !sendpage_ok(page))
return _drbd_no_send_page(peer_device, page, offset, size, msg_flags);

msg_flags |= MSG_NOSIGNAL;
--
2.26.2

2020-08-16 18:05:01

by Cong Wang

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] net: introduce helper sendpage_ok() in include/linux/net.h

On Sun, Aug 16, 2020 at 1:36 AM Coly Li <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> The original problem was from nvme-over-tcp code, who mistakenly uses
> kernel_sendpage() to send pages allocated by __get_free_pages() without
> __GFP_COMP flag. Such pages don't have refcount (page_count is 0) on
> tail pages, sending them by kernel_sendpage() may trigger a kernel panic
> from a corrupted kernel heap, because these pages are incorrectly freed
> in network stack as page_count 0 pages.
>
> This patch introduces a helper sendpage_ok(), it returns true if the
> checking page,
> - is not slab page: PageSlab(page) is false.
> - has page refcount: page_count(page) is not zero
>
> All drivers who want to send page to remote end by kernel_sendpage()
> may use this helper to check whether the page is OK. If the helper does
> not return true, the driver should try other non sendpage method (e.g.
> sock_no_sendpage()) to handle the page.

Can we leave this helper to mm subsystem?

I know it is for sendpage, but its implementation is all about some
mm details and its two callers do not belong to net subsystem either.

Think this in another way: who would fix it if it is buggy? I bet mm people
should. ;)

Thanks.

2020-08-17 05:48:52

by Christoph Hellwig

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] net: introduce helper sendpage_ok() in include/linux/net.h

On Sun, Aug 16, 2020 at 10:55:09AM -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 16, 2020 at 1:36 AM Coly Li <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > The original problem was from nvme-over-tcp code, who mistakenly uses
> > kernel_sendpage() to send pages allocated by __get_free_pages() without
> > __GFP_COMP flag. Such pages don't have refcount (page_count is 0) on
> > tail pages, sending them by kernel_sendpage() may trigger a kernel panic
> > from a corrupted kernel heap, because these pages are incorrectly freed
> > in network stack as page_count 0 pages.
> >
> > This patch introduces a helper sendpage_ok(), it returns true if the
> > checking page,
> > - is not slab page: PageSlab(page) is false.
> > - has page refcount: page_count(page) is not zero
> >
> > All drivers who want to send page to remote end by kernel_sendpage()
> > may use this helper to check whether the page is OK. If the helper does
> > not return true, the driver should try other non sendpage method (e.g.
> > sock_no_sendpage()) to handle the page.
>
> Can we leave this helper to mm subsystem?
>
> I know it is for sendpage, but its implementation is all about some
> mm details and its two callers do not belong to net subsystem either.
>
> Think this in another way: who would fix it if it is buggy? I bet mm people
> should. ;)

No. This is all about a really unusual imitation in sendpage, which
is pretty much unexpected. In fact the best thing would be to make
sock_sendpage do the right thing and call sock_no_sendpage based
on this condition, so that driver writers don't have to worry at all.

2020-08-17 19:14:38

by Cong Wang

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] net: introduce helper sendpage_ok() in include/linux/net.h

On Sun, Aug 16, 2020 at 10:45 PM Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Aug 16, 2020 at 10:55:09AM -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 16, 2020 at 1:36 AM Coly Li <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > The original problem was from nvme-over-tcp code, who mistakenly uses
> > > kernel_sendpage() to send pages allocated by __get_free_pages() without
> > > __GFP_COMP flag. Such pages don't have refcount (page_count is 0) on
> > > tail pages, sending them by kernel_sendpage() may trigger a kernel panic
> > > from a corrupted kernel heap, because these pages are incorrectly freed
> > > in network stack as page_count 0 pages.
> > >
> > > This patch introduces a helper sendpage_ok(), it returns true if the
> > > checking page,
> > > - is not slab page: PageSlab(page) is false.
> > > - has page refcount: page_count(page) is not zero
> > >
> > > All drivers who want to send page to remote end by kernel_sendpage()
> > > may use this helper to check whether the page is OK. If the helper does
> > > not return true, the driver should try other non sendpage method (e.g.
> > > sock_no_sendpage()) to handle the page.
> >
> > Can we leave this helper to mm subsystem?
> >
> > I know it is for sendpage, but its implementation is all about some
> > mm details and its two callers do not belong to net subsystem either.
> >
> > Think this in another way: who would fix it if it is buggy? I bet mm people
> > should. ;)
>
> No. This is all about a really unusual imitation in sendpage, which

So netdev people will have to understand and support PageSlab() or
page_count()?

If it is unusual even for mm people, how could netdev people suppose
to understand this unusual mm bug? At least not any better.

> is pretty much unexpected. In fact the best thing would be to make
> sock_sendpage do the right thing and call sock_no_sendpage based
> on this condition, so that driver writers don't have to worry at all.

Agreed, but kernel_sendpage() still relies on mm to provide a helper
to make the decision and ensure this helper is always up-to-date.

In short, it is all about ownership.

Thanks.

2020-08-18 07:02:23

by Christoph Hellwig

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] net: introduce helper sendpage_ok() in include/linux/net.h

On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 12:12:12PM -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
>
> So netdev people will have to understand and support PageSlab() or
> page_count()?

Yes. As they came up with that contrived rule what is acceptable
for sendpage. No one else really knows and other subsystems like the
block layer are perfectly fine with it.

>
> If it is unusual even for mm people, how could netdev people suppose
> to understand this unusual mm bug? At least not any better.

It is not a mm bug, it is a networking quirk.