2023-07-08 16:43:44

by xuanzhenggang001

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] m68k: q40: prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of 'unsigned'

Fix the following warnings reported by checkpatch:

./arch/m68k/q40/q40ints.c:172: WARNING: Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare
use of 'unsigned'
./arch/m68k/q40/q40ints.c:211: WARNING: Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare
use of 'unsigned'

Signed-off-by: Zhenggang Xuan <[email protected]>
---
arch/m68k/q40/q40ints.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/m68k/q40/q40ints.c b/arch/m68k/q40/q40ints.c
index 127d7ecdbd49..9605d7b6cb30 100644
--- a/arch/m68k/q40/q40ints.c
+++ b/arch/m68k/q40/q40ints.c
@@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ void q40_sched_init (void)
*
*/

-struct IRQ_TABLE{ unsigned mask; int irq ;};
+struct IRQ_TABLE { unsigned int mask ; int irq ; };
#if 0
static struct IRQ_TABLE iirqs[]={
{Q40_IRQ_FRAME_MASK,Q40_IRQ_FRAME},
@@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ static int aliased_irq; /* how many times
inside handler ?*/
/* got interrupt, dispatch to ISA or keyboard/timer IRQs */
static void q40_irq_handler(unsigned int irq, struct pt_regs *fp)
{
- unsigned mir, mer;
+ unsigned int mir, mer;
int i;

//repeat:


2023-07-24 09:30:11

by Geert Uytterhoeven

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] m68k: q40: prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of 'unsigned'

Hi Zhenggang,

On Sat, Jul 8, 2023 at 6:06 PM <[email protected]> wrote:
> Fix the following warnings reported by checkpatch:
>
> ./arch/m68k/q40/q40ints.c:172: WARNING: Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare
> use of 'unsigned'
> ./arch/m68k/q40/q40ints.c:211: WARNING: Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare
> use of 'unsigned'
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhenggang Xuan <[email protected]>

Thanks for your patch!

But obviously you forgot to run scripts/checkpatch.pl on your own patch:

WARNING: From:/Signed-off-by: email name mismatch: 'From:
[email protected]' != 'Signed-off-by: Zhenggang Xuan
<[email protected]>'

> --- a/arch/m68k/q40/q40ints.c
> +++ b/arch/m68k/q40/q40ints.c
> @@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ void q40_sched_init (void)
> *
> */
>
> -struct IRQ_TABLE{ unsigned mask; int irq ;};
> +struct IRQ_TABLE { unsigned int mask ; int irq ; };
> #if 0
> static struct IRQ_TABLE iirqs[]={
> {Q40_IRQ_FRAME_MASK,Q40_IRQ_FRAME},
> @@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ static int aliased_irq; /* how many times
> inside handler ?*/
> /* got interrupt, dispatch to ISA or keyboard/timer IRQs */
> static void q40_irq_handler(unsigned int irq, struct pt_regs *fp)
> {
> - unsigned mir, mer;
> + unsigned int mir, mer;

This part is white-space damaged, and thus fails to apply.

> int i;
>
> //repeat:

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [email protected]

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds